With Miller in that altercation last night, I hope to see a little more support from the team. I'd also like to see that hit on Myers in the corner again. It looked like Callahan launched himself at him.
With Miller in that altercation last night, I hope to see a little more support from the team. I'd also like to see that hit on Myers in the corner again. It looked like Callahan launched himself at him.
are you talking about the one in the 3rd period?
Tiny Derek Roy grabbed the dude from behind and Lydman came right in- the other guys had their backs turned and were already headed up ice for the breakout so they probably didn't see it.
Don't get me wrong- in general, the defense of Miller has been spotty at best. But in this particular case, I think Lydman and Roy handled it well. Miller was just in the guy's face because he was so pissed.
They handled it right? Miller was bumped into/run AGAIN and had to get in the guy's face himself. Roy grabbed him from behind because that is the best he could do and Lydman just made sure to push him away from Miller. A guy runs your goalie, you gotta DO something and we rarely do. Unless Rivet, Montadour, Gaustad, Mair are on the ice.Originally Posted by OpIv37
Well it would have been nice if Gaustad or Mair, or even Grier or Torres, were there to really stomp the guy, but I think Roy and Lydman did about the most they're capable of, which is more than what Vanek, Connolly, Pominville, Kennedy, Hecht, Butler or Sekera would have done.Originally Posted by chernobylwraiths
why does everybody think because you hit somebody back after they run the goalie that they will stop running the goalie? very strange belief amongst hockey fans. the only way to stop a guy from running the goalie is to use your hockey stick as a baseball bat to his face. torterella's teams are infamous for running goalies. think there might be a coincidence there? I would suspect they would continue to run them as long as he tells them to run them. fans need to get over this emotion - it serves no purpose. these are free thinking NHL professional hockey players who will continue to run the goalie regardless what you do.
For all the education and practice each of us undergoes, the achievment of mastery is ultimately the outcome of a personal quest for understanding.
i hope the sabres run the opposing goalies. it's clear they don't want to fight over miller getting run, but it would be awesome if they responded with a mamoth running of the opposing goalie. that'd show some real brass and make a playoff series quite enjoyable.
Roy stood up for his teammates twice last night and from what I can tell, that is two more times than he has all season. I was very pleased with that.
I was seated right behind that net and saw Miller fight back and it got everyone going crazy.
Derek also went after the guy who dumped Myers in the corner.
you have to launch yourself at myers to hit him shoulder to shoulder, he's so effing tall..
Actually, and I hate to say it, but Connolly has been one of the few to stand up for Miller.Originally Posted by OpIv37
If there is retribution, players will be less likely to go after the goalie. Sure, they will still bump goalies, but they will do it less often. No hockey fan wants to see their team back down all the time and allow their star players to be pushed around.Originally Posted by Ebenezer
I find it strange that you say they won't stop running the goalie unless you take your stick across their face though.
It is more than I've ever seen from him, even if the only thing he did is grab them.Originally Posted by RockStar36
That's false, it's been proven to be false and will always be false. Retribution does not equal less goalie running. It's just not true. the guys on HNIC, NHLN, Paul Hamilton and other reporters have all said the same thing. There are certain coaches and certain players that will continually run goalies regardless what you do to retaliate unless you physically take that player out of the game (hence the stick across the face comment)...and when that guy is out of the game they will just send somebody else out there to run the goalie. Retailiation does not decrease it; it's a misconception.Originally Posted by chernobylwraiths
i disagree with this. it might not stop goalie running, but it slows down the running. if you know there is no repurcussion you go as hard as humanly possible every chance you get. If you know you're going to get popped just as frequently, it takes a toll on players and they slowly stop doing it with the same force. It becomes a mind game that the runner has to deal with. and the goalie has a piece of mind that the front of the net is going to be cleared.Originally Posted by Ebenezer
In the case of the Myers hit, he did a little more than just grab Callahan.Originally Posted by chernobylwraiths
Even if Roy doesn't drop the gloves, I think him standing up for his teammates sends a message to the rest of the team.
I'm ok with what Roy did. I'm not so sure I'd even want him dropping his gloves.
just ask HolwegOriginally Posted by Ebenezer
the reason standing up for your teammates has not bearing on future actions of the other team is because of the god awful instigator rule... most you can do to stick up for a teammate is push the guy around, they're not affraid of getting whopped in a fight because of the extra 2min.
RIP Tommy D!
12/25/1978-9/9/2008
If you make something "Idiot-proof", they'll only make better idiots!
Personally, I think Miller is a little sick of the lack of physical support he gets when guys drop on him.