Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

  1. #1
    Pinkerton's son Pinkerton Security's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts
    6,003
    Thanks
    593
    Thanked 959 Times in 522 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    2. C.J. Spiller
    Count me in the group of folks who question what the Buffalo Bills were thinking in not drafting a tackle until Round 5. They passed on good tackles several times before the fifth round. Still, Spiller has the chance to make an immediate impact in the NFL. Yes, the learning curve for running backs will naturally push them onto lists like this, but Spiller lands here also because he figures not to receive the holes most backs need to be successful, and he and Best are the two players taken early who can get huge yardage out of nothing. The question for the Bills will be whether a back like Spiller, who shouldn't be cast into a role as a guy piling up much more than 15 carries per game, also can be used in the passing or return games.

    http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft...ory?id=5140364

  2. #2
    Registered User Mahdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada, Ottawa
    Posts
    10,585
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 1,184 Times in 712 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Im really sick of this INSIDER BS... as if they are more enlightened than any other sports site. They need to drop that non-sense, its enough that I visit their website and give them hits.

  3. #3
    Pinkerton's son Pinkerton Security's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts
    6,003
    Thanks
    593
    Thanked 959 Times in 522 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by Mahdi
    Im really sick of this INSIDER BS... as if they are more enlightened than any other sports site. They need to drop that non-sense, its enough that I visit their website and give them hits.
    i agree...i get ESPN the mag as a gift so i get it for free anyways, but it is def a rip-off...is somewhat worth it during draft season and for fantasy purposes but other than that it is completely worthless.

  4. #4
    Retired - On Several Levels Night Train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Last Depot
    Posts
    33,117
    Thanks
    9,387
    Thanked 14,240 Times in 7,618 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    126

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Let's look at it another way. Spiller may get 10-12 carries a game, with Fred Jackson getting more. He may also get another 5 catches a game lining up as a slot WR or in motion...in the open field..in space...where he can break it.

    That's worth it to me. He can score on every play. Jackson can not.

  5. #5
    Registered User THATHURMANATOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Kenmore
    Posts
    69,112
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 1,017 Times in 512 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    257

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    They are going to use Spiller in multiple roles this year. He won't be a workhorse back. Maybe the reason for keeping Beastmode.

  6. #6
    Registered User FlyingDutchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    5,074
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 76 Times in 40 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    what solid immediate impact tackles were really available at our 2nd pick?

  7. #7
    Registered User THATHURMANATOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Kenmore
    Posts
    69,112
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 1,017 Times in 512 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    257

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman
    what solid immediate impact tackles were really available at our 2nd pick?
    I think Brown was there but again was LT more of a need than NT? I really don't think so. We had NO ONE to play NT with. We had at least 2 young LT with some starting experience on our roster. That had to be their mindset.

    Now we have a space eating NT for downs 1 and 2 and we can bring in a capable player like Williams on passing downs.

  8. #8
    Pinkerton's son Pinkerton Security's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts
    6,003
    Thanks
    593
    Thanked 959 Times in 522 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingDutchman
    what solid immediate impact tackles were really available at our 2nd pick?
    yeah i really hate how they seem to focus on our needs and not to what was actually on the board at that point...we obviously (or at least i hope) felt that none of the tackles on the board at these points were any better than what we currently have on our roster. I mean i kept getting surprised when we didnt select a tackle also, but looking back at it there really werent a ton of tackle prospects, and it seems, to me, that there was a big fall-off between the top guys, hell even the 2nd tier guys like Anthony Smith and Bulaga, and the guys that were available for us.

  9. #9
    Registered User TigerJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Gates, NY
    Posts
    22,575
    Thanks
    858
    Thanked 3,564 Times in 2,153 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    90

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by Night Train
    Let's look at it another way. Spiller may get 10-12 carries a game, with Fred Jackson getting more. He may also get another 5 catches a game lining up as a slot WR or in motion...in the open field..in space...where he can break it.

    That's worth it to me. He can score on every play. Jackson can not.
    Moreover, since Spiller is not likely to be an every down back, he will probably be available for return duty where he might be good for 2 or 3 touchdowns in the season, as well as several other long returns.
    I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

    I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

  10. #10
    Registered User Mahdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada, Ottawa
    Posts
    10,585
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 1,184 Times in 712 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by TigerJ
    Moreover, since Spiller is not likely to be an every down back, he will probably be available for return duty where he might be good for 2 or 3 touchdowns in the season, as well as several other long returns.
    Spiller IS an every down RB. The only thing he probably wouldn't do is short yardage like 3rd/4th and 1 or 2. Other than that, expect to see Spiller get plenty of carries. He ran well inside in his senior year and showed that he can handle the workload.

  11. #11
    Legendary Zoner psubills62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    -
    Posts
    11,295
    Thanks
    470
    Thanked 762 Times in 473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    42

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by Mahdi
    Spiller IS an every down RB. The only thing he probably wouldn't do is short yardage like 3rd/4th and 1 or 2. Other than that, expect to see Spiller get plenty of carries. He ran well inside in his senior year and showed that he can handle the workload.
    I have no doubts that he'll get his touches. Obviously they didn't draft him #9 overall just to put him on kickoffs. I think that Tiger was trying to say that Spiller won't be a workhorse. And he shouldn't be, considering we have two capable RB's behind him.

    Spiller has already got a decent amount of wear on his tires for a rookie. I think he'll get ~10 carries and ~5 receptions per game. He'll be on the field a lot, and I can see him even being used as a decoy a number of times.
    "Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
    - Nicholas Cummings

  12. #12
    Registered User Mahdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada, Ottawa
    Posts
    10,585
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 1,184 Times in 712 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by psubills62
    I have no doubts that he'll get his touches. Obviously they didn't draft him #9 overall just to put him on kickoffs. I think that Tiger was trying to say that Spiller won't be a workhorse. And he shouldn't be, considering we have two capable RB's behind him.

    Spiller has already got a decent amount of wear on his tires for a rookie. I think he'll get ~10 carries and ~5 receptions per game. He'll be on the field a lot, and I can see him even being used as a decoy a number of times.
    10 carries is very little for the 9th overall pick. I expect more like 15-20 with Jackson getting 10-15 of his own.

    We should be running the ball about 35 times a game.

  13. #13
    Legendary Zoner psubills62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    -
    Posts
    11,295
    Thanks
    470
    Thanked 762 Times in 473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    42

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by Mahdi
    10 carries is very little for the 9th overall pick. I expect more like 15-20 with Jackson getting 10-15 of his own.

    We should be running the ball about 35 times a game.
    Maybe, but I still don't think they'll use Spiller as a main back, primarily to prevent him wearing down too fast.

  14. #14
    Everything I post is sexual inuendo ddaryl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The North Left Coast
    Posts
    10,714
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    51

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    I like to see Spiller used at wideout some this year. He can outrun most any DB, and would cause major matchup headaches for opposing D's


  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    5,216
    Thanks
    823
    Thanked 972 Times in 578 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by Mahdi
    10 carries is very little for the 9th overall pick. I expect more like 15-20 with Jackson getting 10-15 of his own.

    We should be running the ball about 35 times a game.
    I agree. If Spiller is only getting 10 carries a game then drafting him so high doesn't make a lot of sense.

  16. #16
    Registered User Mahdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada, Ottawa
    Posts
    10,585
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 1,184 Times in 712 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by psubills62
    Maybe, but I still don't think they'll use Spiller as a main back, primarily to prevent him wearing down too fast.
    If he is not used as the main back then drafting him was senseless. This guy should be on the field for 80-90% of the offensive plays.

    He should be taking 15-20 carries, lining up in the slot on passing downs, catching out of the backfield and running wildcat.


    This guy should be our main offensive weapon at all times. I remember Chris Johnson single-handedly dismantling our defense running, catching, screens and decoy in our regular season game against the Titans last year.
    Last edited by Mahdi; 04-28-2010 at 12:22 PM.

  17. #17
    Pinkerton's son Pinkerton Security's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts
    6,003
    Thanks
    593
    Thanked 959 Times in 522 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by Mahdi
    If he is not used as the main back then drafting him was senseless. This guy should be on the field for 80-90% of the offensive plays.

    He should be taking 15-20 carries, lining up in the slot on passing downs, catching out of the backfield and running wildcat.


    This guy should be our main offensive weapon at all times.
    you may be right, but I'd be willing to bet we ease him into the league...i dont think he'll be getting as many touches right out of the gate as he does near the end of the year.

  18. #18
    Registered User Mahdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Canada, Ottawa
    Posts
    10,585
    Thanks
    174
    Thanked 1,184 Times in 712 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    Quote Originally Posted by pinkdogg32
    you may be right, but I'd be willing to bet we ease him into the league...i dont think he'll be getting as many touches right out of the gate as he does near the end of the year.
    Yeah I agree. I think the first couple games he will get eased into it. But once he starts making plays he will be featured all over the offense.

  19. #19
    Rumblin' Stumblin' Bumblin' Buffalogic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    KC
    Posts
    5,345
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 1,801 Times in 1,034 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    We're going to run the ball like 40+ times a game. There's plenty of carries to go around. And Freddy as well as Spiller can go out to slot. I'd love to see all three backs on the field at once. Split backs, one in the slot. Our Rb's are much better than our receivers, so keep the best players on the field!

  20. #20
    is the creepy cross dresser staring at you in the corner mikemac2001's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    4,574
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 104 Times in 64 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Re: Kiper looks at immediate impact players

    i would like alot of 2 back sets like pro form and moving in motion or using some flat patterns to get a LB mismatch

    MUCK
    FIAMI

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •