Offensive players not a need?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cpearl
    Registered User
    • Mar 2005
    • 286

    Offensive players not a need?

    How can anyone who knows anything about the NFL think that an offensive superstar (like Spiller, best RB and overall offensive player in the draft ) wasn't a "need" for us?

    What was our offensive rank last year? 30? Have we even been better than 25th in 4 or 5 years?

    We can't score. He can. Therefore, he is a need. Especially over the 3rd best OT in the draft or a ****ty QB.

    Enough already.
  • mikemac2001
    is the creepy cross dresser staring at you in the corner
    • Mar 2003
    • 4574

    #2
    Re: Offensive players not a need?

    Originally posted by cpearl
    How can anyone who knows anything about the NFL think that an offensive superstar (like Spiller, best RB and overall offensive player in the draft ) wasn't a "need" for us?

    What was our offensive rank last year? 30? Have we even been better than 25th in 4 or 5 years?

    We can't score. He can. Therefore, he is a need. Especially over the 3rd best OT in the draft or a ****ty QB.

    Enough already.

    Most of that get that....i wouldn't spaz about it we had a good draft

    MUCK
    FIAMI

    Comment

    • Johnny Bugmenot
      Will not tolerate vandalism.
      • Apr 2006
      • 4311

      #3
      Re: Offensive players not a need?

      Wasn't the Bills' problem that they stall in the red zone? If so, given the fact that the main selling point was that Spiller scores from outside the red zone... he doesn't help this team at all.

      Comment

      • OpIv37
        Acid Douching Asswipe
        • Sep 2002
        • 101232

        #4
        Re: Offensive players not a need?

        Originally posted by cpearl
        How can anyone who knows anything about the NFL think that an offensive superstar (like Spiller, best RB and overall offensive player in the draft ) wasn't a "need" for us?

        What was our offensive rank last year? 30? Have we even been better than 25th in 4 or 5 years?

        We can't score. He can. Therefore, he is a need. Especially over the 3rd best OT in the draft or a ****ty QB.

        Enough already.
        Demetrius Bell is our starting LT.
        Trent Edwards is our starting QB.
        Lee Evans is our best WR, and it goes downhill fast from there.
        At the time of the Spiller pick, we had literally zero NT's on the roster. Zero.

        At the time of the Spiller pick, we had 2 legitimate NFL RB's on the roster. The reason we are 30 in O has nothing to do with RB. It has to do with OL, QB, and WR- three needs that were not addressed.

        If you want to say no LT's were worth the pick, fine. If you want to say that going Best Player Available is a better strategy, fine. But with all the holes on this team, saying RB was a need is just plain asinine.
        Last edited by OpIv37; 04-30-2010, 12:44 PM.
        MiKiDo Facebook
        MiKiDo Website

        Comment

        • cpearl
          Registered User
          • Mar 2005
          • 286

          #5
          Re: Offensive players not a need?

          Lelgitimate RBs don't win games. Great ones do.

          Comment

          • OpIv37
            Acid Douching Asswipe
            • Sep 2002
            • 101232

            #6
            Re: Offensive players not a need?

            Originally posted by cpearl
            Lelgitimate RBs don't win games. Great ones do.
            No RB can win games without an LT, a QB or a defense that can stop the other team. CJ Spiller alone does not make this offense legit- he simply makes it slightly less bad.
            MiKiDo Facebook
            MiKiDo Website

            Comment

            • Philagape
              WIN NOW
              • Jul 2002
              • 19432

              #7
              Re: Offensive players not a need?

              Originally posted by Johnny Bugmenot
              Wasn't the Bills' problem that they stall in the red zone? If so, given the fact that the main selling point was that Spiller scores from outside the red zone... he doesn't help this team at all.
              Um, if Spiller scores outside the red zone, then the Bills no longer have to try from inside the red zone on that drive :brilliant:
              "It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther

              "Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill

              2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
              2004 BZ Big Money League Champion

              Comment

              • Philagape
                WIN NOW
                • Jul 2002
                • 19432

                #8
                Re: Offensive players not a need?

                Originally posted by OpIv37
                At the time of the Spiller pick, we had 2 legitimate NFL RB's on the roster.
                Ah, but are they CONTRIBUTORS?
                "It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther

                "Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill

                2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
                2004 BZ Big Money League Champion

                Comment

                • mysticsoto
                  Too sober for this...
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 31439

                  #9
                  Re: Offensive players not a need?

                  Originally posted by OpIv37
                  No RB can win games without an LT, a QB or a defense that can stop the other team. CJ Spiller alone does not make this offense legit- he simply makes it slightly less bad.
                  Gailey has made every team's offense he's joined better. That sounds like a pretty good track record...

                  Comment

                  • Griff
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 8154

                    #10
                    Re: Offensive players not a need?

                    Originally posted by OpIv37
                    No RB can win games without an LT, a QB or a defense that can stop the other team. CJ Spiller alone does not make this offense legit- he simply makes it slightly less bad.
                    you really believe 1 draft would've made us super awesome? If we drafted say Bulaga at 9th, Clausen at 41 we would literally be waiting years for them to become starters. We drafted a starting home run hitting RB, and a starting NT.

                    Comment

                    • ddaryl
                      Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                      • Jan 2005
                      • 10714

                      #11
                      Re: Offensive players not a need?

                      Originally posted by mysticsoto
                      Gailey has made every team's offense he's joined better. That sounds like a pretty good track record...

                      That's the difference between last years O and this one.

                      My money says Gailey gets more mileage out of the same band of misfits and it will all fall on his ability to be as a OC / HC...

                      Something Phillips, Williams, Jauron were not. As for Mularkey... well he shouldn't even have been a HC for us.
                      Last edited by ddaryl; 04-30-2010, 02:13 PM.

                      Comment

                      • OpIv37
                        Acid Douching Asswipe
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 101232

                        #12
                        Re: Offensive players not a need?

                        Originally posted by Griff
                        you really believe 1 draft would've made us super awesome? If we drafted say Bulaga at 9th, Clausen at 41 we would literally be waiting years for them to become starters. We drafted a starting home run hitting RB, and a starting NT.
                        no but I was hoping this draft would do a better job at filling holes.

                        You're making the argument that the Bills should go BPA with the draft (although I beg to differ that they always took BPA, but that's a different issue). Going BPA is fine if they address needs via FA. But they didn't address needs via FA or the draft. So, we have the same glaring holes now that we had at the start of the off season: QB, LT, WR, NT (even if you like Troup, one NT doesn't get us through the season).

                        At some point they have to man up and address these needs. But they'd rather make excuses and tell us it takes "years" to build a team.
                        MiKiDo Facebook
                        MiKiDo Website

                        Comment

                        • billz83
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 445

                          #13
                          Re: Offensive players not a need?

                          truthfully i could care less what this team does anymore...as long as wilson is the owner i dont see this team winning a super bowl! Wilson has done everything in his power to destroy this team..how about we ignore the OLINE again! This FO and organization just doesnt GET IT..they dont understand a winning team HAS TO HAVE a good OLINE and a GOOD DLINE..ignoring the OLINE for over a decade is guaranteed failure! if spiller turns out to be as good as jackson and lynch but NOT BETTER THEN them then this was a COMPLETE worthless pick..i think he will be good im more pissed that this organization just WONT FIX the OLINE and think they have a chance at winning! itz just crazy! they wont even SIGN free agents that are better then who we have on the OLINE because wilson is just TOOO CHEAP!

                          Comment

                          • OpIv37
                            Acid Douching Asswipe
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 101232

                            #14
                            Re: Offensive players not a need?

                            Originally posted by mysticsoto
                            Gailey has made every team's offense he's joined better. That sounds like a pretty good track record...
                            So, how is he going to make our O better with an RT who's not as good as Butler and one extra RB? Band aid on cancer.
                            MiKiDo Facebook
                            MiKiDo Website

                            Comment

                            • madness
                              Registered User
                              • Apr 2003
                              • 13690

                              #15
                              Re: Offensive players not a need?



                              Coming soon... The NFL franchise edition! Just put your franchise in water and watch it groooooooow!!!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X