Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: So what about Bruce DeHaven?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    5,861
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 2,447 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    34

    So what about Bruce DeHaven?

    ST is noticeably worse this year. Worse yet, they seemed to show no improvement from the 1st pre-season game.

    By all accounts, they were praticing a lot of ST in camp per Buffalo standard. Are we going back Wade Philips' "Special team plays are just a defensive play" attitude?

  2. #2
    Dude's Little Ignorant Crony RockStar36's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    24,761
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    152

    Re: So what about Bruce DeHaven?

    I think they will improve over time.

    We were spoiled with Bobby April to some extent, or at least spoiled with having the best in the league.

    I'm willing to trade off and have a decent ST unit though if it means the offense and defense make more plays.

    Just having the best ST in the league does nothing for me anymore.

  3. #3
    Legendary Zoner trapezeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    19,525
    Thanks
    4,356
    Thanked 3,218 Times in 1,859 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: So what about Bruce DeHaven?

    we kept corto, stamer, 9 punt returners, guys too small to be linebackers, too slow to be safeties in the #1 ST days.

    our defenses paid a price when injuries came up.

    Now seem to want to have some solid offense and solid defense and get depth and then plug and play the extras on ST. i'll take that philosphy any day of the week than having to see Costanzo on our team or being sold that ellison is truly a great linebacker.

    Yes, you can keep one or two ST studs like a Pike and Tasker, but building a 53 man roster around trying to be the best ST unit was a disaster...much like every thought jauron ever had.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    2,333
    Thanks
    282
    Thanked 353 Times in 152 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26

    Re: So what about Bruce DeHaven?

    I just posted this in another thread as an explanation for the poor special teams play thus far:

    There's no arguing that the special teams have been bad. That stated, I think special teams is the most difficult part to judge during pre-season. More than the offense and defense, the special teams are flooded with players that won't be on the roster. I don't think we've seen much yet of the players that will actually be on the special teams during the regular season. It's the reason we see so many more returns for TD's league wide during the pre-season. Again, I'm not defedning the the poor play, just offering an explanation.

  5. #5
    Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres. Jan Reimers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Jupiter
    Posts
    17,353
    Thanks
    1,910
    Thanked 1,626 Times in 705 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    139

    Re: So what about Bruce DeHaven?

    Quote Originally Posted by trapezeus
    we kept corto, stamer, 9 punt returners, guys too small to be linebackers, too slow to be safeties in the #1 ST days.
    And we need to keep Corto this season. He is currently injured, which really hurts our coverage teams.
    Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    13,690
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 58 Times in 30 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    61

    Re: So what about Bruce DeHaven?

    I agree, you can't judge ST during preseason.

  7. #7
    Registered User justasportsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bundoks
    Posts
    71,579
    Thanks
    4,073
    Thanked 11,485 Times in 7,099 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    293

    Re: So what about Bruce DeHaven?

    looked like a disaster but I'm hoping that it's because DeHaven was mixing the line up and seeing who he should keep or use. I hope he got on Parrish's face. The guy was lucky he didn't get clocked.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •