How has McKelvin looked in coverage?

[BuffaloBlitz83]

During the preseason?

[X-Era]

Re: How has McKelvin looked in coverage?

During the preseason?

IMO, better than Florence who had way way too many penalties. That said, none of our CB's looked great. I really think its new schemes and not knowing who's covering whom.

[mayotm]

Re: How has McKelvin looked in coverage?

I thought McKelvin looked good.

[YardRat]

Re: How has McKelvin looked in coverage?

Spotty, but more good than bad, which can't be said for some of the others.

[better days]

Re: How has McKelvin looked in coverage?

Spotty, but more good than bad, which can't be said for some of the others.

Considering everyone was learning a new defense, I thought they all looked good.

[Night Train]

Re: How has McKelvin looked in coverage?

McKelvin

Pro - Stays with WR tight on fly patterns and deep posts. Great recovery no matter what cushion he gives.

Con - Gets caught looking into the backfield when the play breaks down, losing his man. Bites on the down and out to the sidelines far too often.

[BillsWin]

Re: How has McKelvin looked in coverage?

Looked good but not shutdown like I thought he would. I still think he will be starting this season and turn into a pro bowler soon enough.

[psubills62]

Re: How has McKelvin looked in coverage?

Inconsistent. Good one game, poor the next.

[JCBills]

Re: How has McKelvin looked in coverage?

Basically blankets his man most of the time, just needs to prevent WRs from making a play more often.