Tweet
How do all you people that couldn't wait for Schobel to leave feel about our pass rush now? It is markedly worse than last year, QB's are camping out, making smores, and shredding our vaunted secondary.
-
-
Re: Schobel is missed
I loved schobelOriginally posted by OpIv37 -
Re: Schobel is missed
Originally posted by HAMMERInternet Breeds Complacency.
Comment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
Seriously though, I loved Schobel. He was our only pass rush for the whole decade, which makes Kelsay's sucking opposite him look so much worse. Schobel still had 10 sacks last year and people hated on him like he was Ryan Denney. It's a joke, I never understood the hate for the man. It's so obvious we need a pass rusher of his caliber right now.Internet Breeds Complacency.
Comment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
Two points:
1. I seem to remember our pass rush struggling WITH Schobel the past several years.
2. Notice how out of place Kelsay looks in this new D? There is no way to know for sure, but I suspect Schobel would look just as confused and out of place.
I will say this, if I had to choose between the two, I'd definitely take Schobel over Kelsay, even if it costs more. But the reality is that we're in a transition period with the D and we need to shed as much of the leftover 4-3 personnel as possible. We'd be slightly better in the short term with Schobel but no better off in the long-term.Comment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
Pass rush hasn't changed.Comment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
Who ??YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Comment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
It has, if you can't see that you aren't watching. It was not stellar by any means but it is worse. People often mistake sack numbers for productivity, you have to get pressure and make a QB uncomfortable. We aren't getting any pressure.Originally posted by MahdiComment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
My biggest contention with Schobel was that I never saw him chasing a QB out of the pocket. He either got owned, or got one of his sacks. His sacks were rarely game changing...which has been difficult to do, but there were moments we could have used a sack, or some pressure to force a turnover.Originally posted by HAMMER
I didn't like the BS Schobel was putting the team through this year. I wouldn't have had a problem if he would have just come back and played, but he made a scene out of it.
I would think that would have been a consensus, but he was one of our better players, making him the target for unwarranted angst.
Comment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
The pass rush has changed... how many sacks have we even gotten? like 2 in 3 games?Originally posted by OpIv37Comment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
I guess the bottom line is he really didn't want to be here. But my point is that he was a more important piece of our defense than people wanted to admit.Originally posted by Beebe's KidComment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
that just proves how very average our team has been for the last decade.Originally posted by HAMMERComment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
No doubt...Originally posted by HAMMER
Being on the defense on this team is the second hardest job, behind QB. I guess unless your name is Stroud...then you can make a small fortune, and do nothing.
I wonder if people forget to ***** about him because he is ****ing invisible?
Comment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
It's a different defense so it's comparing apples to oranges.Originally posted by Buffalo Thriller
Would we have more sacks if Schobel played? It's possible, but it's just as possible that he'd be completely lost in this D, like Kelsay.Comment
-
Re: Schobel is missed
4Originally posted by Buffalo Thriller
Poz (that no good piece of **** mother ****er)
Scott
Williams
Ellis
Half of our sack production is from 2nd string...Last edited by Beebe's Kid; 10-01-2010, 12:41 PM.
Comment
Comment