If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Stokes signs with the Jags for 805K. Seems to me we could have afforded him. I think 805K for him is a good deal.
Anyone else think he could have been at least our 3rd WR for that kind of money?
Lou Saban: You can get it done, you can get it done. And what’s more, you’ve gotta get it done.
yeah, would have loved him for that price. I'm not as down on Jett as some are, but I think stokes would have been a good number 3. Hopefully Jett and Shaw contribute enough this year.
Stokes is not a speed receiver. We do not need another possession receiver, we've got lots of decent ones (some might even turn out to be really good). Jett offers speed to stretch out the D on 3, 4, and 5 WR sets. That's it. Drew might never through the ball to him, however, as an NFL receiver, someone will need to follow him down the field, thus opening up the middle ranges.
Stokes is just another Shaw with a more well-known name. The only reason everyone knows about JJ Stokes is because of where he played the beginning of his career. More specifically, because of who he was touted to replace. Stokes was supposed to be Jerry Rice's replacement. Unfortunately for the San Fran strategizers, Stokes never really panned out to be what they hoped. He had a couple of bright spots, but that's it. Why do you suppose he was a #3 last year and let go this year?
TD and Co. wanted someone who could run very fast. Jett is famous for his ability to do just that (if nothing else). They got exactly what they wanted. Cheap, experienced, still very fast, and hungry to play (even for vet. min.)
I agree Logic, we need SPEED! Not another possesion widout. Moulds is going to get shutdown this year with doubles and triples if we don't find a quality receiver core.
"No body Circles the Wagon, Like the Buffalo Bills!"
Moulds will be lining up in the slot and going in motion a lot this year, so as to prevent defenses from keying in on him. That's what the 49'ers do with Owens, and what the Bills did in the Dols playoff game back in 1999 (1998 season) where Moulds demolished the record for yards in a post-season game (something like 240!).
Originally posted by PA Season Ticket Holder TD didn't want him. He chose Jett instead :angry:
From all i'v read and heard, Sam Aiken has really been impressive in mini-camp and Aiken plays the same style as Stokes so i could see why we didn't sign Stokes and signed speed instead (Jett).
I think we will see Aiken alot more then we all thought on draft day.
Originally posted by robeezy I agree Logic, we need SPEED! Not another possesion widout. Moulds is going to get shutdown this year with doubles and triples if we don't find a quality receiver core.
With some reasonable game-planning this year we'll be incredibly tough to stop. But the problems will come if Gilbride insists on rushing the ball <20 times/game while trying to throw, throw, throw our way to success.
Even an idiot could take the current team, w/ or w/o Jett, and make it an offensive juggernaut and we could have been last season as well.
Our OL will rival the best in the league this season, at least in terms of starters. If we properly use Moulds, Reed, Moore, Henry and run the ball a lot more, then teams will have to spread themselves so out that Moulds will be open often. He'll be doubled b/c he's good. But if that happens, as long as Gilbride "doesn't happen", then that would open things up for the underneath/medium passing game and the rushing game.
I see no reason why, unless we rely on the deep ball again, this offense cannot be #1-5 in the league easily, even as is and if Jett retires by opening day!
Anything short of that goal and I'm gonna blame the coaching. They'll never have more talent on the field on O than we have right now aggregately!
Replace Donahoe with Modrak and fire the entire coaching staff!
Originally posted by Doc Moulds will be lining up in the slot and going in motion a lot this year, so as to prevent defenses from keying in on him. That's what the 49'ers do with Owens, and what the Bills did in the Dols playoff game back in 1999 (1998 season) where Moulds demolished the record for yards in a post-season game (something like 240!).
This post is the freaking truth. If we move Moulds around and let he and Bledsoe play together at their highest possible level, he will eat up the behatches who try to cover him.
Tweet
Comment