That should have no bearing whatsoever on who they pick at No. 3.
Who they draft should be based on how they evaluate the prospects on their own merits. That's it.
And you can take any historical positional trends and shove them into your hole where they belong.
You can't go into a pick thinking it MUST be a certain position. That's what resulted in Whitner, McCargo and other busts. They should pick whoever's at the top of their value chart, based only on the pros and cons of each player.
Nobody's disputing that Fitz isn't a franchise QB, but if one isn't available at third overall -- meaning, there isn't one worth that pick, in their judgment -- then they have to find another solution if they want one.
I'm not saying here that there's no QB worth no. 3, although I'm doubtful. That's another issue. If they truly feel there's a QB good enough to warrant the pick, then they should pull the trigger for that reason alone.
But "Fitz isn't the answer" is not an argument to draft a QB at third overall no matter what.