Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

[psubills62]

According to SI's Peter King, the Bills will not draft a wide receiver at No. 3 overall.

King says Buffalo will either draft a front-seven defender or quarterback, with Marcell Dareus, Da'Quan Bowers, Von Miller, Cam Newton, and Blaine Gabbert all distinct possibilities. An A.J. Green-Steve Johnson pairing would be pretty lethal, but the Bills still have Lee Evans and Roscoe Parrish, and are high on young wideouts Donald Jones and David Nelson.

http://www.rotoworld.com/sports/nfl/football

I know k-oneputt will be disappointed about this, but that's just how life is.

[Mr. Miyagi]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

How soon we forget. Lee Evans can be a top shelf receiver with a decent QB.

[trapezeus]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

i hate peter king's reports when he delves into predictions and comedy.

but the guy consistently networks to get the best of the best inside information. This post made me happy.

[Ed]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

Plus we should get to add Easley into the mix this year.

[Novacane]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

How soon we forget. Lee Evans can be a top shelf receiver with a decent QB.

Evans is not a top shelf receiver.

[BertSquirtgum]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

Evans is not a top shelf receiver.

miyagi said he CAN be a top shelf receiver and he would have been a perennial pro-bowler if he wasn't stuck with garbage qb play for the last 6 years.

[madness]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

It's Peter King...

It's now confirmed we will be drafting a WR @ #3.

[Novacane]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

miyagi said he CAN be a top shelf receiver and he would have been a perennial pro-bowler if he wasn't stuck with garbage qb play for the last 6 years.

I won't argue a better QB would have helped him. Not so sure he'd of ever been a perennial pro-bowler.

[Mr. Miyagi]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

Evans is not a top shelf receiver.

Totally is.

[OpIv37]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

I'm glad we're not drafting a WR at #3 but I don't know why we'd say this publicly. It kills any chance of a trade down with anyone looking for the top WR (not that many GM's would trade up to 3 to take a WR, but you never know).

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

I'm glad we're not drafting a WR at #3 but I don't know why we'd say this publicly. It kills any chance of a trade down with anyone looking for the top WR (not that many GM's would trade up to 3 to take a WR, but you never know).

How so?

If the team @ #4 wants a WR the other team would move up to #3.

And the Bills never said it publically

[mayotm]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

I'm glad we're not drafting a WR at #3 but I don't know why we'd say this publicly. It kills any chance of a trade down with anyone looking for the top WR (not that many GM's would trade up to 3 to take a WR, but you never know).

Did I miss something? Where did the Bills say anything publicly about who they are or aren't drafting? Peter King isn't on the Bills payroll last time I checked.

[better days]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

How so?

If the team @ #4 wants a WR the other team would move up to #3.

And the Bills never said it publically

I agree. The rest of the league know the Bills wants & needs & they do not include a WR.

[Ed]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

I'm glad we're not drafting a WR at #3 but I don't know why we'd say this publicly. It kills any chance of a trade down with anyone looking for the top WR (not that many GM's would trade up to 3 to take a WR, but you never know).

We didn't say it publicly. Peter King did.

[OpIv37]

Re: Bills will NOT draft a WR at #3

He reported it like he knew something, not like it was his opinion.

If it's his opinion, fine, you guys are right. If he got the info from someone in the FO and used it as the basis of the story, then that person needs to STFU.