As I said in the other thread, this DOES NOT TAKE INTO EFFECT the "hotness factor" of the girls. Since "beauty is in the eye of the beholder," I'd need to have multiple people rank each card from best to worst to get a fair "hotness factor."
The score is calculated based on a weighted formula. The following factors go into the formula:
1: How many total cards the player has
2: How much of the player's $200,000 salary cap is remaining
3. The average cost per card won by the player (EX: 2 cards totaling $70k would average $35k)
Each player is "ranked" in the 3 categories... 1 is the highest rank, where 31 is currently the lowest rank (since 31 players have at least 1 card)
The 3 rankings are then added together... The sum is divided by 3 to come up with the score you see. Like golf, you want the lowest score.
Since I'm still experimenting with this, any constructive criticism is welcome. The current formula I'm working with is:
((CardRank x 2.25) + CapRank + AvgRank)/3 = Score
For non-nerds...
CardRank:
You are ranked based on how many cards you have... Currently, the highest amount of cards any one player has is 4 (4 players have 4 cards). Those players get a "1" for CardRank. anyone with 3 cards gets a "5" for CardRank and so on. That ranking is multiplied by 2.25.
CapRank:
You are ranked based on how much cap space you have left. The Jokeman currently has the most cap space left among card owners... So, he gets a 1 in CapRank. Ranking goes down from there. In this category, TacklingDummy would be 31st with $69 ZB left under the cap.
AvgRank:
You are ranked based on your average cost per card. The less you spend per card won, the better.
The above three rankings are added together and then divided by 3. Whoever has the lowest score at that point is #1 in the Power Ranking.
Questions, comments, suggestions?
-Bill
Comment