Quick note on the Run D.......

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BidsJr
    Registered User
    • Sep 2002
    • 2858

    Quick note on the Run D.......

    Rewatched the game this morning and by my calculations 8 carries for 62yards came against the backup D-Line. Charles other 20 yarder came on a missed tackle by Barnett.

    So the starting D-Line gave up 46 total yards on 10 carries (4.6 ypc), with one of them being a 22 yarder on a missed tackle by Barnett.

    Hopefully they can pick up where they left off on Sunday.
    Last edited by BidsJr; 09-16-2011, 10:40 AM.
    "Well I drink too much and get punched in the head by fighters for fun, so my memory isn't so great." -OpIv37
  • justasportsfan
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 71606

    #2
    Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

    The Raiders OL is bigger than Kansas .Troup is not 100% and that worries me in terms of rotation. We need to stop the run and force Campbell to beat us with their banged up wr's
    sacrifice1
    https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

    Comment

    • WeAreArthurMoates
      Registered User
      • Feb 2009
      • 1642

      #3
      Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

      Originally posted by justasportsfan
      The Raiders OL is bigger than Kansas .Troup is not 100% and that worries me in terms of rotation. We need to stop the run and force Campbell to beat us with their banged up wr's
      The raiders tackles, and center are worse than KC.

      Comment

      • ServoBillieves
        The Voice of Reason
        • Jul 2007
        • 6106

        #4
        Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

        From what I remember of Monfay night (and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) I saw a lot of mauling and some desperation pulls/holds by their O-line, most overlooked by blatant penalties all around. Rough line play could fire up Dareus, Williams and Edwards, and I see a Lights Out off the edge if their tackles move that slow on Sunday.
        Bye Bye Brady...

        Comment

        • streetkings01
          Registered User
          • Jul 2006
          • 2980

          #5
          Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

          Originally posted by justasportsfan
          The Raiders OL is bigger than Kansas .Troup is not 100% and that worries me in terms of rotation. We need to stop the run and force Campbell to beat us with their banged up wr's
          Bigger doesn't mean better. The Bills had the biggest oline in the NFL in 2007 & 2008 and still sucked ass. They lost Gallery and starting a 2nd year LT..........they ran over the Broncos who went from a 3-4 defense last year to John Fox's 4-3 this year. The Raiders are one dimensional.......you stop the run you stop them.
          You can call me streetkings

          Comment

          • justasportsfan
            Registered User
            • Jul 2002
            • 71606

            #6
            Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

            Originally posted by BuffaloBills06
            Bigger doesn't mean better.
            after seeing your avatar ,I agree.
            sacrifice1
            https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/

            Comment

            • Oaf
              Do you read what you write?
              • Jun 2007
              • 6151

              #7
              Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

              Originally posted by BidsJr
              Rewatched the game this morning and by my calculations 8 carries for 62yards came against the backup D-Line. Charles other 20 yarder came on a missed tackle by Barnett.

              So the starting D-Line gave up 46 total yards on 10 carries (4.6 ypc), with one of them being a 22 yarder on a missed tackle by Barnett.

              Hopefully they can pick up where they left off on Sunday.
              It's not like carries against the rotation dline don't count.

              Comment

              • ferg2butler
                Registered User
                • Dec 2008
                • 26

                #8
                Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

                Originally posted by Oaf
                It's not like carries against the rotation dline don't count.
                Most of them they were running at Carrington, It looked like they were picking on him, he wasn't getting of his blocks on the edge and they went inside him. I saw it in the preseason too

                Comment

                • Goobylal
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 19371

                  #9
                  Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

                  The difference is that the Chefs had the threat of a passing game, what with a stud like Bowe and a decent receiver opposite him in Breaston. The Raiders have nothing of note.

                  Comment

                  • YardRat
                    Well, lookie here...
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 86308

                    #10
                    Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

                    I'm worried about the Raider o-line taking out one of our d-linemen or LBers out with a chop/cut block.
                    YardRat Wall of Fame
                    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
                    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

                    Comment

                    • ddaryl
                      Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                      • Jan 2005
                      • 10714

                      #11
                      Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

                      Originally posted by justasportsfan
                      The Raiders OL is bigger than Kansas .Troup is not 100% and that worries me in terms of rotation. We need to stop the run and force Campbell to beat us with their banged up wr's

                      Troup is out .... Heards in.

                      Comment

                      • Oaf
                        Do you read what you write?
                        • Jun 2007
                        • 6151

                        #12
                        Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

                        Originally posted by ddaryl
                        Troup is out .... Heards in.
                        No big D. Heard is fine. Picking on Carrington is something I could see happening. maybe that's why Spencer Johnson got some reps out there this week.

                        Comment

                        • Extremebillsfan247
                          Registered User
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 3142

                          #13
                          Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

                          Originally posted by justasportsfan
                          The Raiders OL is bigger than Kansas .Troup is not 100% and that worries me in terms of rotation. We need to stop the run and force Campbell to beat us with their banged up wr's
                          What separates KC from Oakland though is that KC has a better receiving game, and a better QB. Bills can stack the box against the Raiders which is something they couldn't do against KC. McFadden potentially could have an even worse game than Charles did. JMO

                          Comment

                          • Meathead
                            Insufferable ***** and perpetual crybaby
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 21349

                            #14
                            Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

                            Originally posted by ServoBillieves
                            Monfay night (and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong)
                            One set of rules for all in the beloved community

                            Comment

                            • TigerJ
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 22575

                              #15
                              Re: Quick note on the Run D.......

                              Originally posted by justasportsfan
                              The Raiders OL is bigger than Kansas .Troup is not 100% and that worries me in terms of rotation. We need to stop the run and force Campbell to beat us with their banged up wr's
                              I understand. Oakland may not have the skill, but all that beef can wear down an opponent if you don't have the horses to keep rotating people in. Kellen Heard will need to be part of the rotation. Since Oakland is his old team, that may give him a little extra motivation to do well, and he's certainly big enough. Fortuantely both Williams and Dareus have something of a reputation for durability and endurance, though with Dareus it's at the college level..
                              I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

                              I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X