I believe he is just guessing, but I would agree. I don't think Bedard would allow that anyway.Originally Posted by mysticsoto
I believe he is just guessing, but I would agree. I don't think Bedard would allow that anyway.Originally Posted by mysticsoto
I'm telling you- nostalgia factor.Originally Posted by mysticsoto
A lot of people on this board are at the age where they grew up watching her on Saved by the Bell.
Never watched that show, so maybe that's why I don't see it...Originally Posted by OpIv37
when I was a kid I always thought the other two girls on the show were hotter anyway.Originally Posted by mysticsoto
Originally Posted by OpIv37
I agree
Dunno, but I found it when I googled "Elizabeth Berkley 2011." It was the first pic in the third row, so...Originally Posted by EricStratton
Unless it's from a magazine, is from a specific movie, or has a specific date on it (like a red carpet appearance or something) it'd be hard to tell when a pic was from.
-Bill
Hell, I still watch it.Originally Posted by OpIv37
Originally Posted by TacklingDummy
Fixed!!!!
That pick is from the showgirls days... I cant allow that. I dont want to be a stickler about the cards at all, but at least work it into a 5 year window.
Last edited by The King; 10-19-2011 at 12:39 PM.
I remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?"
"Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet.
You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times."
It was all true what he was saying. And yet, I thought something is brewing inside the head of this Coach.
He sees something in me, some kind of raw talent that he can mold. But that's when I felt the handcuffs go on.
Like I said, the pic didn't have a date on it... No way to tell when it was from...Originally Posted by King Bedard
But whatever:
Prefer the first one, but the second one is fine as well...
For the record, the pic of Tiffani-Amber Thiesen was from FHM in 2001, so if you want a 5 year window, that shouldn't have been allowed either.
I'm sure there are others as well, just sayin'...
-Bill
Last edited by BLeonard; 10-19-2011 at 01:09 PM.
You have to have a time limit or Christina Applegate/Aguilera and a host of others should be redone then. It's not fair to pick a picture from just any time period and clearly just by the look of the original picture you posted, she was in her younger days...Originally Posted by BLeonard
I'm personally not against a timelimit, per se...Originally Posted by mysticsoto
What bugs me is the fact that there are pics ot there that are clearly out of the "5 year limit," yet there was no complaint about those being used...
As I said before, the pic of Tiffani-Amber Thiessen was from April, 2001... The proof is here: http://www.ebay.com/itm/French-FHM-4...-/170530012644
The pic used for Jaime Pressly was from Stuff magazine in December, 1999:
That's just two of them and not a word was said about either... Yet, I have yet to see any concrete proof of when the Berkley pic was taken.
I don't see why the pic I submitted is a big deal, when others don't have to use the same criteria... If there's a rule, it should apply to everyone, IMO.
-Bill
Last edited by BLeonard; 10-19-2011 at 01:35 PM.
It may be hard to find a bad picture of her anyway.
Fine with me, I was unaware. I will find a new pick of Jamie.Originally Posted by BLeonard
Of Jaime Pressly?Originally Posted by EricStratton
If so, chalenge accepted:
-Bill
Originally Posted by BLeonard
I was talking about Berkley.
The bigger issue is, Bedard would then have to redo all of the cards that "don't qualify." I assume that would be a HUGE pain in the ass for him.Originally Posted by chernobylwraiths
If the game is ending in a month anyway, I don't see the issue with simply leaving the cards as is.
If you want to impose a rule where a pic has to be within a certain time frame, start that rule next year. But again, could be tough to determine when pics were taken.
Nobody else has been questioned or denied a pic for a card, so I don't see the reason to start now. Maybe the winner should have to pick from one of the three that Bedard puts up initially, I dunno...
-Bill
I agree 100%. If some pics were used that were old, and you (or anybody else) know that for sure, it should be pointed out. Ideally, you should have done this at that time, but even so...they should be retroactively changed - as it is not fair to use an old picture at one point and not another.Originally Posted by BLeonard
Originally Posted by mysticsoto
Are you volunteering?
I think we all know what these women look like enough that it doesn't matter. In fact I only initially asked because the picture looked like her as a high school kid and not as a woman although she was probably in her 20's when it was taken.
The cards are so small I can't imagine it will be what determines who wins.
I don't really care much if he has more cards to do, because that IS the rule. He said before no old pics. I had no idea mine was that old. I was trying to find an appealing pic to me and I went too far.Originally Posted by BLeonard