Ya know... for joining in the last 3 weeks of the game, I'm happy with finishing 17th. Didn't think I'd get that high.
Ya know... for joining in the last 3 weeks of the game, I'm happy with finishing 17th. Didn't think I'd get that high.
Bye Bye Brady...
updated
I remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?"
"Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet.
You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times."
It was all true what he was saying. And yet, I thought something is brewing inside the head of this Coach.
He sees something in me, some kind of raw talent that he can mold. But that's when I felt the handcuffs go on.
For all the **** BLeonard took during the game, he finished kind of middle-of-the-pack.
It was his value that saved him. His value rating is much higher and his hotness ranking is much lower than anyone near him in the standings.
So many people were trying to get into the game that I think the first three months of auctions would look completely different if they were done again.
Agreed. I think those that joined later had a huge advantage.
HOLY ****
I made the top 10
I am amazed
I am going to reveal one at a time now.
Yeah, I should have realized that people wouldn't rate these honestly. 3 of my top 5 are out already
gonna finish today ?Originally Posted by King Bedard
I think he means one a day - that's some serious milking!!!Originally Posted by utmhead
I dont know if I agree with this. It's based on taste and preference everyone rated differently.Originally Posted by chernobylwraiths
No.... I'll get you down to the top 5 today.Originally Posted by mysticsoto
How do we know people didn't? Looks are subjective and what one finds hot, another doesn't. There were no rules for how to judge value either, so people used their own criteria which, no doubt, varied from person to person.Originally Posted by chernobylwraiths
Whether you think Kim K is talentless or even not that pretty, rating her a 0 or 1 is ridiculous. 0 or 1 is for Betty White, Kathy Bates or Rosie O'Donnell. Preference has nothing to do with it.Originally Posted by King Bedard
Plus, you already said that you saw people giving stronger "teams" really low marks to increase their chances is disingenuous. But like I said, I should have figured that would happen.
I'm old, I forget that the object is to win.
Stratton
nbf
tdummy
cher
miyagi
tmu
utm
mystic
Most of the ones I had ranked higher are still in it, I think.
YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Here is a strain of ratings for one team.... look at how much it varies
H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V H V 8.5 2.5 1 2 5 1 8 3 8 1 4 2 7 2 2 1 5 3 6 1 6 1 6.5 1 8 1 6 0 8 2 5 1 3 3 3 1 3 1 5 1
Myagi and Cher are gone.Originally Posted by YardRat
I'm pretty happy with my value score. With only the top 10 left to unveil, I still have the highest score in the "value" category.Originally Posted by OpIv37
While I don't think I have the "hottest" team out there, I do think I was slighted a bit on the hotness scores and should have been a bit higher. Part of that was my fault too, though, as I made a late-game trade (gave Jamie Chung for Kate Walsh, in hopes of being able to get a 7th card... Which nobody got to 7 cards) and I probably value a few of my cards a bit higher than everyone else does (always been a big fan of McCarthy, Berkley and McMahon).
But at the same time, with people out there giving Kim Kardashian a 0 or 1... That's a little extreme, IMO... Like I said, the lowest scores I handed out for hotness were 5's.
-Bill
your cards wouldve been rated higher if they had heads.