Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

  1. #1
    Legendary Zoner psubills62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    -
    Posts
    11,295
    Thanks
    470
    Thanked 762 Times in 473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    42

    Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    So I'm discussing Hines Ward with people on another board. Some of them think he should be in the HOF (I don't).

    Along those lines, I'm wondering what the arguments are for Andre Reed to be in the HOF? Also, was he a good blocker? I'll be honest, I don't remember watching him (though I might have when I was really young), so I'm hoping to hear from those who did watch him play. What are the statistics/main points that people use to argue for putting Reed in the HOF?

    I'd like to compare Reed to Ward and make the point that if Reed isn't in, Ward shouldn't be either.
    "Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
    - Nicholas Cummings

  2. #2
    Skoobasaurus-Rex Skooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Naples FL
    Posts
    22,284
    Thanks
    14,920
    Thanked 5,215 Times in 3,684 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    63

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by psubills62
    So I'm discussing Hines Ward with people on another board. Some of them think he should be in the HOF (I don't).

    Along those lines, I'm wondering what the arguments are for Andre Reed to be in the HOF? Also, was he a good blocker? I'll be honest, I don't remember watching him (though I might have when I was really young), so I'm hoping to hear from those who did watch him play. What are the statistics/main points that people use to argue for putting Reed in the HOF?

    I'd like to compare Reed to Ward and make the point that if Reed isn't in, Ward shouldn't be either.
    Rings / no rings, don't look into it much further.

  3. #3
    Administrator DraftBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    107,451
    Thanks
    4,847
    Thanked 24,472 Times in 14,180 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    276

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    I honestly don't think Reed should be in. Certainly not before some of the other WR's currently sitting on the outside.
    COMING SOON...
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

  4. #4
    Legendary Zoner psubills62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    -
    Posts
    11,295
    Thanks
    470
    Thanked 762 Times in 473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    42

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by DraftBoy
    I honestly don't think Reed should be in. Certainly not before some of the other WR's currently sitting on the outside.
    I'm assuming Hines Ward is not one of those "other WR's" though.

  5. #5
    Legendary Zoner psubills62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    -
    Posts
    11,295
    Thanks
    470
    Thanked 762 Times in 473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    42

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by MitchMurrayDowntown
    Rings / no rings, don't look into it much further.
    ? I'm looking for arguments as to why Reed SHOULD be in the HOF, not why he isn't.

  6. #6
    Peterman Sucks! Mr. Pink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    the fifth ring of hell
    Posts
    35,303
    Thanks
    2,755
    Thanked 10,254 Times in 6,469 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    97

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    I don't think either should be in.

  7. #7
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    24,178
    Thanks
    4,126
    Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,285 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    72

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Arguments for why? How about fearless over the middle, excellent yac and if I am not mistaken isn't he an all-time leader in the playoffs for receiving yards and tds? That should be significant shouldn't it?
    www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    2,333
    Thanks
    282
    Thanked 353 Times in 152 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by FunTimesYaY!
    I don't think either should be in.
    You probably don't think Bruce, Kelly or Thomas belong either. You know, just to be different.
    Last edited by mayotm; 03-20-2012 at 06:32 PM.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    I'm so torn on Reed and the HOF. I think he should get in eventually, but there are other WR's more deserving that should get in first.

  10. #10
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    24,178
    Thanks
    4,126
    Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,285 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    72

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by DasBills
    I'm so torn on Reed and the HOF. I think he should get in eventually, but there are other WR's more deserving that should get in first.
    Yeah, but one could make the argument that reed was a better WE than some who are already enshrined.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by DasBills
    I'm so torn on Reed and the HOF. I think he should get in eventually, but there are other WR's more deserving that should get in first.
    Eventually is an eternity ago. If Reed does not get in SOON he never will. Players like Hines Ward that played in the watered down NFL will be retiring. And they will have much better stats due to the rules changes. When Reed played receivers were hit all the way down the field, not this 5 yd from the OL BS.

  12. #12
    Peterman Sucks! Mr. Pink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    the fifth ring of hell
    Posts
    35,303
    Thanks
    2,755
    Thanked 10,254 Times in 6,469 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    97

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by mayotm
    You probably don't think Bruce, Kelly or Thomas belong either. You know, just to be different.
    Andre Reed doesn't have the numbers that suggest he was a HOFer.

    There's better receivers than him that still aren't in, Carter, Brown as examples.

    Bruce Smith is a top 5 DE in NFL history...Thurman Thomas was Marshall Faulk before there was a Marshall Faulk...and Kelly QB'd a team that got to 4 straight SB's.

    Andre Reed was an average NFL WR with numbers, on average, that parallel him to guys like Keyshawn Johnson, Keenan McCardell, Henry Ellard.

  13. #13
    Formerly MARCELL DAREUS POWER, now posting as DANNY BATTEN POWER NOT THE DUDE...'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    8,826
    Thanks
    556
    Thanked 414 Times in 316 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by better days
    Eventually is an eternity ago. If Reed does not get in SOON he never will. Players like Hines Ward that played in the watered down NFL will be retiring. And they will have much better stats due to the rules changes. When Reed played receivers were hit all the way down the field, not this 5 yd from the OL BS.
    im pretty sure the committee will factor that in.

    andre reed is quite possibly the great rac wr ever. his acceleration and feel for openings was unreal. he was also one of the bravest wrs ever considering the time he played and how he made his living over the middle.

    reed was an essential part of the 4superbowl run.
    i think he has like over 7 or 8 pro bowls

    andre reed also had incredible moments at key times. e.g. 3 tds in the comeback game.

    andre reed was also a complete wr.
    he was big, he was fast, he was quick, he had great hands, he was smart, he had every quality you want.

    one could make the logical argument that if thomas, kelly, and lofton are in, than of course the number 1 wr from 86-97 should get in.

    andre reed even into his mid 30s was still an above average wr.

    i think hes top 10 in all major wr stats, catches, tds, yards, etc. if not, hes close.

    to say andre shouldnt be in the hof is literally on par with saying jerry rice or michael irvin shouldnt get it. its a joke...
    Last edited by NOT THE DUDE...; 03-20-2012 at 07:30 PM.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by better days
    Eventually is an eternity ago. If Reed does not get in SOON he never will. Players like Hines Ward that played in the watered down NFL will be retiring. And they will have much better stats due to the rules changes. When Reed played receivers were hit all the way down the field, not this 5 yd from the OL BS.
    I agree, he'll also be going up against the T.O.'s and Randy Moss' of the world.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    162
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by ublinkwescore
    Yeah, but one could make the argument that reed was a better WE than some who are already enshrined.
    Not that I disagree, but who in particular did you have in mind?

  16. #16
    Formerly MARCELL DAREUS POWER, now posting as DANNY BATTEN POWER NOT THE DUDE...'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    8,826
    Thanks
    556
    Thanked 414 Times in 316 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by DasBills
    Not that I disagree, but who in particular did you have in mind?
    art monk, lofton, stallworth,

    thats 3 right off the top of my head. of course those wrs are great, i just think reed was better. made more plays

  17. #17
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    24,178
    Thanks
    4,126
    Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,285 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    72

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by DasBills
    Not that I disagree, but who in particular did you have in mind?
    Michael Irvin, Art Monk.

  18. #18
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    24,178
    Thanks
    4,126
    Thanked 1,876 Times in 1,285 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    72

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Steve Largent.

  19. #19
    Registered User Mski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Williamsville Ny
    Posts
    6,753
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    38

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by FunTimesYaY!
    Andre Reed doesn't have the numbers that suggest he was a HOFer.

    There's better receivers than him that still aren't in, Carter, Brown as examples.

    Bruce Smith is a top 5 DE in NFL history...Thurman Thomas was Marshall Faulk before there was a Marshall Faulk...and Kelly QB'd a team that got to 4 straight SB's.

    Andre Reed was an average NFL WR with numbers, on average, that parallel him to guys like Keyshawn Johnson, Keenan McCardell, Henry Ellard.
    check you numbers again... his number are more inline with carter and brown than the three you mentioned
    RIP Tommy D!
    12/25/1978-9/9/2008


    If you make something "Idiot-proof", they'll only make better idiots!

  20. #20
    Formerly MARCELL DAREUS POWER, now posting as DANNY BATTEN POWER NOT THE DUDE...'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    8,826
    Thanks
    556
    Thanked 414 Times in 316 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Andre Reed, HOF arguments

    Quote Originally Posted by Mski
    check you numbers again... his number are more inline with carter and brown than the three you mentioned
    its also not just numbers, its how he affected coverage, what he did with his catches compared to someone like keyshawn. reed was more of a threat....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •