If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
It would be very expensive. The rams want Kalil too (allegedly) and the browns would much rather go to 6 than 10. The discussion would have to start with next year's first.
It would be very expensive. The rams want Kalil too (allegedly) and the browns would much rather go to 6 than 10. The discussion would have to start with next year's first.
And moving next year's first is a non-starter for the Bills.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
It would be very expensive. The rams want Kalil too (allegedly) and the browns would much rather go to 6 than 10. The discussion would have to start with next year's first.
Cheap draft picks (contract wise) versus the old system have a way of looking smart for a team without a QB, Miami is lost right now.
I really owuld not want to trade Freddie.. he is just that much better then Spiller is. Although Spiller could keep improving, there isn't a single thing Freddie does that Spiller does better...
trading up is way to expensive a price to pay for a LT.. A stud QB like Luck sure.. but a LT probably not worth the cost
How about this fantasy trade, Spencer and/or Edwards, #10 this year our 3rd this year, and our 2nd next year..... We have a plethora of DE and DT's on the roster.
the best rated LT at the 4th pick????makes me scared. and we'd be trading more to get that.
bills are in a crappy situation draft wise. not enough talent to trade down, no one they need at 10. I think they'll stay put and take the BPA. That will be a WR, CB, or LB. We could get better at all those positions.
If Miami traded up to 3 for Tannehill, they are even more screwed up than I thought. I would also not be in favor of the Bills trading up. They just came off of a barely 6 - 10 season. This team can't afford to give up draft picks, at least not yet. JMO
Comment