Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: My 53, in depth chart form

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,316
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked 78 Times in 53 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    4
    ZoneBux
    10,278.18
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    10,278.18
    Donate

    My 53, in depth chart form

    QB- Fitzpatrick, Young, Smith- 3
    RB- Jackson, Spiller, White- 3
    FB- Dickerson-1
    WR- Johnson, Jones, Graham, Nelson, Hagan, 5
    TE- Chandler, Lee (2)
    LT- Glenn, Sanders(2)
    LG- Levitre, Reinhart(2)
    C- Wood (1), Urbik
    RG- Urbik, Reinhart
    RT- Pears- Hairston(2)
    LE- Williams, Kelsay (2)
    RE- Anderson, Merriman, Moore (3)
    DT- K-Will, Heard (2)
    DT- Dareus, Johnson, Carrington (3)
    LB- Barnett, Bradham (2)
    LB- Sheppard, Carder, (2)
    LB- Moats, Morrison (2)
    NLB- Scott (1)
    CB- Gilmore, Williams (2)
    CB- Brooks, McKelvin (2)
    NB- McGee, Miller (2)
    SS- Wilson, Howell (2)
    FS- Byrd, Searcy (2)

    K- Lindell (1)
    KO- Potter (1)
    P- Moorman (1)
    LS- Sanborn (1)
    Please excuse my dumb and pointless topics and posts, i more than likely will not be sober for any of them

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Lockport
    Posts
    1,557
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 196 Times in 91 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    6
    ZoneBux
    4,876.96
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    4,876.96
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    I like Corey McIntyre over Dickerson. He's valued on special teams and I don't see us using Dickerson enough to warrant losing McIntyre.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,316
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked 78 Times in 53 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    4
    ZoneBux
    10,278.18
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    10,278.18
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    Quote Originally Posted by Bangarang View Post
    I like Corey McIntyre over Dickerson. He's valued on special teams and I don't see us using Dickerson enough to warrant losing McIntyre.


    I dont see with Jackson and Spiller being on the field most of the time together, needing a strong full back. Were a spread 2 RB team. Not a pro style 1 RB 1 FB scheme. I think having a recieving FB is more valueable say if you have a 3 RB formation. You can do alot more with a recieving FB that can block of, then a non recieving threat whos a good blocker

  4. #4
    Lets GO BUFFALO!! SquishDaFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
    Posts
    16,407
    Thanks
    1,071
    Thanked 261 Times in 169 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    64
    ZoneBux
    30,873.77
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    30,873.77
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    McIntyre isnt going to be cut IMO. And I think Rosey makes it over Hagan

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    537
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 203 Times in 126 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    2
    ZoneBux
    7,947.66
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    7,947.66
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    Quote Originally Posted by Cali512 View Post
    I dont see with Jackson and Spiller being on the field most of the time together, needing a strong full back. Were a spread 2 RB team. Not a pro style 1 RB 1 FB scheme. I think having a recieving FB is more valueable say if you have a 3 RB formation. You can do alot more with a recieving FB that can block of, then a non recieving threat whos a good blocker
    You can't stay in the spread all the time, unless the offense is off-the-charts great. When you get a lead you need to run more and use clock, or else the defense can get tired and leads surrendered. The spread usually means quick possessions, not running clock.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    903
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 29 Times in 24 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    5
    ZoneBux
    3,917.16
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    3,917.16
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    no rodgers? I thought he played well last year.

  7. #7
    Registered User Beebe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    424
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked 37 Times in 21 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    2
    ZoneBux
    17,730.78
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    17,730.78
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    I like Mr.Rogers he's hurt right.

  8. #8
    It's soooo embarrassing YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    38,438
    Thanks
    1,853
    Thanked 1,495 Times in 950 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    118
    ZoneBux
    59,745.31
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    59,745.31
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    QB- Fitzpatrick, Young, Smith- 3
    RB- Jackson, Spiller, White- 3 - I still think Choice has a chance here
    FB- Dickerson-1 - McIntyre should stick, but see TE's.
    WR- Johnson, Jones, Graham, Nelson, Hagan, 5
    TE- Chandler, Lee (2) - Dickerson as #3TE
    LT- Glenn, Sanders(2) - Hairston may end up here (find out this week) and Young may push Sanders to PS
    LG- Levitre, Reinhart(2)
    C- Wood (1), Urbik - Think Brown gets a spot on the interior line.
    RG- Urbik, Reinhart
    RT- Pears- Hairston(2)
    LE- Williams, Kelsay (2)
    RE- Anderson, Merriman, Moore (3)
    DT- K-Will, Heard (2) - Edwards over Heard
    DT- Dareus, Johnson, Carrington (3) - Carrington gets cut and we go with 4 total
    LB- Barnett, Bradham (2)
    LB- Sheppard, Carder, (2)
    LB- Moats, Morrison (2) - McKillop may take Morrison's spot...maybe even Carder's.
    NLB- Scott (1)
    CB- Gilmore, Williams (2)
    CB- Brooks, McKelvin (2)
    NB- McGee, Miller (2) - Only if Rogers gets IR'd, otherwise he bumps Miller
    SS- Wilson, Howell (2) - Howell's played well, but there may not be enough room for another safety, especially if we keep a KOS.
    FS- Byrd, Searcy (2)

    K- Lindell (1)
    KO- Potter (1)
    P- Moorman (1)
    LS- Sanborn (1)

    Long you live and high you fly And smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry And all you touch and all you see Is all your life will ever be.

  9. #9
    Registered User Extremebillsfan247's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,120
    Thanks
    177
    Thanked 141 Times in 93 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    12
    ZoneBux
    25,301.41
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    25,301.41
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    Not too bad. Most of it looks about right. I think Sanders will be cut, Hairston will still be on the final depth chart as a LT, and Young becomes the backup to Pears. I also think McGee is going to be gone, replaced by Gilmore with Williams on the other side, Mckelvin in the slot. I also think Searcy is in jeopardy. Saenz and Howell are both doing very well in training camp. Saenz is also doing well on special teams which is one of the keys to making the team for these young guys according to Gailey. I could be completely wrong, but this with the rest of your lineup just seems right to me. JMO

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,316
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked 78 Times in 53 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    4
    ZoneBux
    10,278.18
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    10,278.18
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    Quote Originally Posted by Extremebillsfan247 View Post
    Not too bad. Most of it looks about right. I think Sanders will be cut, Hairston will still be on the final depth chart as a LT, and Young becomes the backup to Pears. I also think McGee is going to be gone, replaced by Gilmore with Williams on the other side, Mckelvin in the slot. I also think Searcy is in jeopardy. Saenz and Howell are both doing very well in training camp. Saenz is also doing well on special teams which is one of the keys to making the team for these young guys according to Gailey. I could be completely wrong, but this with the rest of your lineup just seems right to me. JMO


    Searcy is not in any jeopordy. In fact i believe Wanny or Gailey mentioned how they have to find away to get him on the field. Hes been one of the stars in camp, and i think Howell is doing better than Saenz. I noticed 36 alot in practice and the first game, but after last game i cant see him being cut

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,316
    Thanks
    53
    Thanked 78 Times in 53 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    4
    ZoneBux
    10,278.18
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    10,278.18
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    QB- Fitzpatrick, Young, Smith- 3
    RB- Jackson, Spiller, White- 3 - I still think Choice has a chance here- SAME BUT I LIKE WHITE ALOT BETTER
    FB- Dickerson-1 - McIntyre should stick, but see TE's. I AGREE WITH THIS
    WR- Johnson, Jones, Graham, Nelson, Hagan, 5
    TE- Chandler, Lee (2) - Dickerson as #3TE
    LT- Glenn, Sanders(2) - Hairston may end up here (find out this week) and Young may push Sanders to PS. I FORGOT BOUT YOUNG AND YES I WOULD REPLACE BOTH
    LG- Levitre, Reinhart(2)
    C- Wood (1), Urbik - Think Brown gets a spot on the interior line. I DONT. WE WOULDNT BE PUTTING URBIK AT C IF WE THOUGHT BROWN COULD. REINHART WILL TAKE OVER THE BACKUP GUARDS, AND URBIK WILL MOVE TO CENTER IF WOODS INJURED AND REINHART WILL TAKE THE RG SPOT
    RG- Urbik, Reinhart
    RT- Pears- Hairston(2)
    LE- Williams, Kelsay (2)
    RE- Anderson, Merriman, Moore (3)
    DT- K-Will, Heard (2) - Edwards over Heard- FORGOT ABOUT EDWARDS. EDWARDS-HEARD OVER CARRINGTON
    DT- Dareus, Johnson, Carrington (3) - Carrington gets cut and we go with 4 total
    LB- Barnett, Bradham (2)
    LB- Sheppard, Carder, (2)
    LB- Moats, Morrison (2) - McKillop may take Morrison's spot...maybe even Carder's. EH, I HAD ISSUES WITH THIS ONE. I HAD HIM AS THE 3RD MLB, BUT MY GUESS IS IF HE MAKES IT IT WILL BE WITH CARDER TO THE PS
    NLB- Scott (1)
    CB- Gilmore, Williams (2)
    CB- Brooks, McKelvin (2)
    NB- McGee, Miller (2) - Only if Rogers gets IR'd, otherwise he bumps Miller- EXPECTING IR
    SS- Wilson, Howell (2) - Howell's played well, but there may not be enough room for another safety, especially if we keep a KOS. NIX SAID 4 SAFETIES. WE HAVE 3, HOWELL HAS BEEN THE BEST IN THE 4TH SAFETY BATTLE AND SHOULD MAKE THE TEAM
    FS- Byrd, Searcy (2)

    K- Lindell (1)
    KO- Potter (1)
    P- Moorman (1)
    LS- Sanborn (1)

  12. #12
    It's soooo embarrassing YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    38,438
    Thanks
    1,853
    Thanked 1,495 Times in 950 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    118
    ZoneBux
    59,745.31
    Bank
    0.00
    Total ZoneBux
    59,745.31
    Donate

    Re: My 53, in depth chart form

    I DONT. WE WOULDNT BE PUTTING URBIK AT C IF WE THOUGHT BROWN COULD. REINHART WILL TAKE OVER THE BACKUP GUARDS, AND URBIK WILL MOVE TO CENTER IF WOODS INJURED AND REINHART WILL TAKE THE RG SPOT
    That's a great point, I just hope it isn't the case, especially if Wood and Pears aren't 100% going into the season. This roster spot could be determined by the injuries. I just can't see them starting with Urbik at C and Rhinehart at guard with no back-ups left on the roster for the interior line if somebody goes down during the game.

    IMO the 53rd and final spot is going to be between Potter (KOS), Brown (backup oline), a safety (I agree if they keep 4, not counting Scott, Howell should get the nod at this point) or a sixth WR (most unlikely scenario). We'll have room for one, but not all four (unless, of course, we go really short on d-linemen or LBers).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •