Are we being fair to Fitz?

[mrbojanglezs]

Re: Are we being fair to Fitz?

The difference is if you need to win a game in the 4th quarter or need him to make a play in a tight spot he always seems to fail you. Only exception is the Oakland game

[Luisito23]

Re: Are we being fair to Fitz?

LOL, X-Era is about the biggest, hardheaded homer I've ever seen.

I still like you X, but man, some of your excuses for this team are straight otta the Twilight Zone.

[Historian]

Re: Are we being fair to Fitz?

Hemay have less Ints than Daulton and Ponder, but I bet he leads the league in hitting his running back in the ankles with a screen pass.

[gebobs]

Re: Are we being fair to Fitz?

No I'm not happy with his picks.

Totally agree on the rest.

The question is less about whether he is good enough for us to get to the playoffs and more about him being good enough for those that only needed an average QB.

The Bills fans' culture of mediocrity illustrated.

[X-Era]

Re: Are we being fair to Fitz?

LOL, X-Era is about the biggest, hardheaded homer I've ever seen.

I still like you X, but man, some of your excuses for this team are straight otta the Twilight Zone.

Wow are you off base.

Do a search on how I feel about our choices at QB, or passing on one so many times, or not signing solid vets, or the overall talent level and how we seem to think its just fine. I have been here every year clamoring for a high first franchise QB. I remain convinced that only finding one will return us to the SB. I agreed that the Dilfer/Ravens or Brad Johnson/Bucs method can win but as I suspected we would not put together the other pieces for that method to work... And here we are. We need a bonafide franchise guy. Nix has finally publicly acknowledged that and so I'm glad that he has.

This thread is to point out that the average QB that many were just fine with is playing average and now no one thinks its good enough.

I'm far from a homer.