Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

  1. #1
    Registered User DesertFox24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,689
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 419 Times in 251 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    I hope Buddy Nix picks this guy up on waivers we need another starting corner, even if Aaron Williams is not hurt.

    That being said I doubt it because of his contract but would love to have him on our team wanted him when he was cut originally would be big.

    - - - Updated - - -

    More so for long term than this week, because he has a 4 year deal if I am not mistaken but would instantly make our coverage better. He was not suited for the style of defense the chiefs want to run he is a press man cover guy like we want to run.

  2. #2
    Acid Douching Asswipe OpIv37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    75,665
    Thanks
    4,180
    Thanked 7,926 Times in 3,869 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    212

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    if he was released, why do we have to pick him up on waivers? If the Bills wanted him, couldn't they just sign him to a new contract?

  3. #3
    Making Spirits Bright Joe Fo Sho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,113
    Thanks
    436
    Thanked 1,124 Times in 562 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by OpIv37 View Post
    if he was released, why do we have to pick him up on waivers? If the Bills wanted him, couldn't they just sign him to a new contract?
    Because if we pick him up on waivers he has to come here, so we don't have to compete with other teams. But then we get locked into his contract, however big that is.

  4. #4
    Acid Douching Asswipe OpIv37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    75,665
    Thanks
    4,180
    Thanked 7,926 Times in 3,869 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    212

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
    Because if we pick him up on waivers he has to come here, so we don't have to compete with other teams. But then we get locked into his contract, however big that is.
    so released players automatically go on waivers? For how long?

  5. #5
    Watching the Bills suck since 1999 DBrown77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Gastonia NC
    Posts
    1,284
    Thanks
    34
    Thanked 165 Times in 83 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    I think he signed a pretty big contract. 6 mil this year alone.

    I bet Indy picks him up.


  6. #6
    Making Spirits Bright Joe Fo Sho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,113
    Thanks
    436
    Thanked 1,124 Times in 562 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by OpIv37 View Post
    so released players automatically go on waivers? For how long?
    I think it's just a couple of days, I'm not entirely sure. That's how we got Merriman though.

  7. #7
    Making Spirits Bright Joe Fo Sho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,113
    Thanks
    436
    Thanked 1,124 Times in 562 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by OpIv37 View Post
    so released players automatically go on waivers? For how long?
    During the season (starting July 4 and lasting through the regular season), each team has 24 hours to file a claim for a player that another team has made available through the system or waive the right to do so. During the off season each team has several days to file such claims. Claiming teams are assigned the rights to or contracts via a priority system based on inverse order of winning percentage. Players that pass through waivers unclaimed become free agents.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waivers...an_football%29

  8. Post thanked by:

    OpIv37 (11-05-2012)

  9. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,796
    Thanks
    156
    Thanked 706 Times in 432 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    11

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Buddy wanted to sign this guy after the Raiders released him.

  10. #9
    Registered User Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    5,160
    Thanks
    179
    Thanked 1,045 Times in 574 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    24

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    I believe the waiver period is just 24 hours.

    This is the guy that the Bills actually tried to sign back before free agency began and I believe it came down to the Bills, Chiefs, and Bengals. So maybe there is a chance he comes here.

  11. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    625
    Thanks
    855
    Thanked 134 Times in 70 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    5

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Yeah, we better pick him up. How else are we going to guarantee that we don't get a top-5 draft pick? We gotta make sure we win enough games to push us into the 8-12 range where we belong. 7-9 BABY!!!!

  12. Post thanked by:

    coastal (11-05-2012),djjimkelly (11-05-2012),trapezeus (11-05-2012)

  13. #11
    Making Spirits Bright Joe Fo Sho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,113
    Thanks
    436
    Thanked 1,124 Times in 562 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderGun View Post
    Yeah, we better pick him up. How else are we going to guarantee that we don't get a top-5 draft pick? We gotta make sure we win enough games to push us into the 8-12 range where we belong. 7-9 BABY!!!!
    Yeah, because 1 corner will give us 3 more wins that without him.. If we can afford his contract, I'm all for signing this guy.

  14. Post thanked by:

    SquishDaFish (11-05-2012)

  15. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    625
    Thanks
    855
    Thanked 134 Times in 70 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    5

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
    Yeah, because 1 corner will give us 3 more wins that without him.. If we can afford his contract, I'm all for signing this guy.
    lol, obviously, one free agent CB won't single-handedly win us 3 games. I never said that.

    But are we in "save the season" mode, or "think about next year" mode? Personally, I've completely and utterly given up on this season. We aren't going to go 6-1 and make the playoffs, so why bother picking up guys with big salaries to improve our team? At this point, I'd rather just lose-out and get a top-5 pick.

    Each meaningless win screws us on draft day. If we had lost one more game last year, we could've taken Kuechly or Tannehill, instead of Gilmore. In 2011, we could've had Von Miller over Dareus. We could've had Patrick Willis instead of Lynch if we had lost one more meaningless game. You can't tell me we would be better off at this point adding more mediocre players.

  16. #13
    Registered User cookie G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,808
    Thanks
    660
    Thanked 3,146 Times in 1,247 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    19

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    They cut him because he was making 6.5 million and was getting beat on a regular basis.

    Hey! He'd fit right in!

  17. Post thanked by:

    djjimkelly (11-05-2012),Mski (11-07-2012),Night Train (11-06-2012),SquishDaFish (11-05-2012)

  18. #14
    This is great, and all I've done is enter my name! THRILLHO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    1,507
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 362 Times in 189 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    11

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Wouldn't be surprised to see Miami look at him.
    True fans want wins, not draft picks.

  19. #15
    BoB Sabermetrician BLeonard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ft. Wayne, IN
    Posts
    4,348
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,661 Times in 842 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    22

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Maybe a silly question, but why would the Bills want a player cut by a 1-7 team...?

    -Bill

  20. Post thanked by:

    BertSquirtgum (11-06-2012),ThunderGun (11-06-2012)

  21. #16
    Registered User IlluminatusUIUC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    The American Riviera, CA
    Posts
    6,668
    Thanks
    2,473
    Thanked 4,593 Times in 2,482 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by cookie G View Post
    They cut him because he was making 6.5 million and was getting beat on a regular basis.

    Hey! He'd fit right in!
    By us, no less. Fitz and Spiller pooped on their D that game.


    Billszone 2013 Prediction Contest winner!

  22. #17
    Registered User kishoph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    buffalo,n.y.
    Posts
    2,224
    Thanks
    1,380
    Thanked 970 Times in 571 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    16

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    The thing that bugs me most about Williams at corner is that coming out of college, he was rated a top safety, so of course he's playing corner. Imagine that, the Bills playing someone out of position.

  23. Post thanked by:

    ThunderGun (11-06-2012)

  24. #18
    Making Spirits Bright Joe Fo Sho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,113
    Thanks
    436
    Thanked 1,124 Times in 562 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by ThunderGun View Post
    lol, obviously, one free agent CB won't single-handedly win us 3 games. I never said that.

    But are we in "save the season" mode, or "think about next year" mode? Personally, I've completely and utterly given up on this season. We aren't going to go 6-1 and make the playoffs, so why bother picking up guys with big salaries to improve our team? At this point, I'd rather just lose-out and get a top-5 pick.

    Each meaningless win screws us on draft day. If we had lost one more game last year, we could've taken Kuechly or Tannehill, instead of Gilmore. In 2011, we could've had Von Miller over Dareus. We could've had Patrick Willis instead of Lynch if we had lost one more meaningless game. You can't tell me we would be better off at this point adding more mediocre players.
    Why can't we be in both? If we pick him up off waivers, we get his contract, too.

  25. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,389
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 712 Times in 426 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    5

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
    Why can't we be in both? If we pick him up off waivers, we get his contract, too.
    I don't think he gets claimed because his base is $1.8M. Any team that claims him will inherit 8/17ths of that, so they have to pay him $847,059 for the remainder of the year. It is possible, but I think teams would rather wait for him to clear and sign him for the minimum.

    Nobody is going to keep him beyond this year. He has a $10M option bonus and a $4.3M salary for 2013.

  26. #20
    Acid Douching Asswipe OpIv37's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    75,665
    Thanks
    4,180
    Thanked 7,926 Times in 3,869 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    212

    Re: Chiefs Release Stanford Routt

    Quote Originally Posted by BLeonard View Post
    Maybe a silly question, but why would the Bills want a player cut by a 1-7 team...?

    -Bill
    This is a very good question.

    I don't know much about the guy. I only watch the Chiefs when we play them and I didn't have any particular reason to watch Rout at the time, so I really have no idea if this guy is good enough to help us or not. But the fact that he got cut mid-year by a 1-7 team is not a good sign.

    If it were the off-season, this could be seen as a salary dump, but who cares about dumping salary in the middle of the year? It doesn't make sense as a salary move alone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •