Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

  1. #1
    BoB Sabermetrician BLeonard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ft. Wayne, IN
    Posts
    4,625
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,813 Times in 944 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    32

    Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Just got the V-Text... No reason as to why.

    -Bill

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Lockport
    Posts
    1,686
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 317 Times in 144 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    So does that mean Spiller will get more than 9 carries? Or does Chan like the matchups with Choice carrying the ball?

  3. Post thanked by:

    jamze132 (11-13-2012)

  4. #3
    Registered User don137's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hilton Head
    Posts
    7,720
    Thanks
    317
    Thanked 485 Times in 254 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    I thought I heard he had concussion like symptoms in the 4th quarter yesterday.

  5. #4
    Registered User Mski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Williamsville Ny
    Posts
    6,753
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    38

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Jackson was knocked silly on that last fumble.. likely has a concusion, but heaven forbid and NFL team diagnose and treat those correctly
    RIP Tommy D!
    12/25/1978-9/9/2008


    If you make something "Idiot-proof", they'll only make better idiots!

  6. Post thanked by:

    coastal (11-12-2012),cookie G (11-12-2012),DraftBoy (11-12-2012),IlluminatusUIUC (11-12-2012),jlgarsh (11-12-2012),Mr. Pink (11-12-2012)

  7. #5
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,587
    Thanks
    30,423
    Thanked 30,467 Times in 17,375 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Well, here you go 'All in for Spiller' fans.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

  8. #6
    Registered User BertSquirtgum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The North Woods
    Posts
    13,379
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 3,399 Times in 2,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Good, I won't have to be worried about the running backs fumbling every time they get the ball.

  9. Post thanked by:

    gebobs (11-12-2012)

  10. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,907
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 274 Times in 137 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    22

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    True test for Spiller... Miami has a great run D. This is a week where he coudl prove himself, and cement his spot as the starting RB for this season and going forward for next

  11. #8
    Registered User Mski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Williamsville Ny
    Posts
    6,753
    Thanks
    104
    Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    38

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    Well, here you go 'All in for Spiller' fans.
    Nix made a comment last week about getting CJ the ball more and the Media and it was something along the lines of """all you guys clamoring for CJ to get the ball more will be the same ones blaiming us for usuing him too much if he gets hurt"""

    now while i'm not a media member, but just and avg joe who's been saying that CJ should be the #1 back no questions asked... (the guy is still averaging over 7ypc... keep giving him the ball until he proves that its just an fluke/product of too few carries to long runs) but i certainly wouldnt blame the coach/FO if he got hurt in a game, and i know the guys on WGR laughed when they heard that too

  12. Post thanked by:

    YardRat (11-12-2012)

  13. #9
    Registered User BertSquirtgum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The North Woods
    Posts
    13,379
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 3,399 Times in 2,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Quote Originally Posted by Mski View Post
    Nix made a comment last week about getting CJ the ball more and the Media and it was something along the lines of """all you guys clamoring for CJ to get the ball more will be the same ones blaiming us for usuing him too much if he gets hurt"""

    now while i'm not a media member, but just and avg joe who's been saying that CJ should be the #1 back no questions asked... (the guy is still averaging over 7ypc... keep giving him the ball until he proves that its just an fluke/product of too few carries to long runs) but i certainly wouldnt blame the coach/FO if he got hurt in a game, and i know the guys on WGR laughed when they heard that too
    That's loser talk Buddy. Buddy is a loser just like his head coach.

  14. Post thanked by:

    gebobs (11-12-2012)

  15. #10
    Registered User jimmifli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    7,827
    Thanks
    10,020
    Thanked 8,924 Times in 4,182 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    39

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    He was out cold on the field. You could see him go stiff with what looks like a fencing response.

    Watch Fred's hands and arms as he's lying on the ground, he's definitely out cold, but I think his hands are clenched and arms straightened, which would be a bad sign.


  16. Post thanked by:

    coastal (11-12-2012)

  17. #11
    One Bills Drive, Georgia - 871 miles south of Orchard Park gebobs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    11,520
    Thanks
    6,740
    Thanked 6,455 Times in 3,965 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    46

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Take a rest, Fred. You got a case of the fumbly wumblies, but I still love ya.

    Oh, and CJ is the #1 back. You're just there to teach him how to block and to spell him from now on.
    Lehner's history. He just doesn't know it yet.

  18. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    388
    Thanked 369 Times in 199 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmifli View Post
    He was out cold on the field. You could see him go stiff with what looks like a fencing response.

    Watch Fred's hands and arms as he's lying on the ground, he's definitely out cold, but I think his hands are clenched and arms straightened, which would be a bad sign.




    Curious, what does the straight arms clenched fists I dictate?

    thanks, Joe

  19. #13
    Registered User jimmifli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    7,827
    Thanks
    10,020
    Thanked 8,924 Times in 4,182 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    39

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Quote Originally Posted by OLDSRIP View Post
    Curious, what does the straight arms clenched fists I dictate?

    thanks, Joe
    A fencing response:


    In this case since Jackson is down, it's tough to see, but I think his body went rigid.

  20. Post thanked by:

    coastal (11-12-2012),cookie G (11-12-2012),OLDSRIP (11-12-2012)

  21. #14
    Registered User djjimkelly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    UNIT 5 Block F Cell 10
    Posts
    7,045
    Thanks
    4,074
    Thanked 1,340 Times in 853 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    i like freddy but good now we get a proper amount of spiller

  22. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    388
    Thanked 369 Times in 199 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmifli View Post
    A fencing response:





    In this case since Jackson is down, it's tough to see, but I think his body went rigid.
    Thanks for the info. I have noticed that happen, but didn't't know they had a name for it.

  23. Post thanked by:

    jimmifli (11-12-2012)

  24. #16
    Registered User jimmifli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    7,827
    Thanks
    10,020
    Thanked 8,924 Times in 4,182 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    39

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Quote Originally Posted by OLDSRIP View Post
    Thanks for the info. I have noticed that happen, but didn't't know they had a name for it.
    It's pretty scary and is now commonly used to diagnose concussions. In MMA or boxing it would get you a 90 day licence suspension.

    In the NFL the dirtbag that hit you flexes for the camera. The NFL has a big concussion problem, and the more people learn about how much damage is caused, the less they enjoy watching it.

  25. #17
    Legendary Zoner coastal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    15,503
    Thanks
    17,200
    Thanked 8,911 Times in 5,303 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    55

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    When Jackson got up, Brandon Spikes flexed his muscle in what I viewed as a demeaning taunt. Keep in mind, a few plays earlier he had been penalized for a helmet to helmet hit on Fitz.

    Realizing the Jackson hit was a shoulder to head contact and legal, the NFL should fine Spikes HEAVILY for the Fitz hit and the taunting of Jackson.

    he is out to hurt someone and this is exactly the same stuff that the NFL dismantled the Saints organization for.

    Anything less is complete hypocrisy.

  26. #18
    Registered User cookie G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    7,496
    Thanks
    1,903
    Thanked 9,877 Times in 4,006 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    42

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmifli View Post
    He was out cold on the field. You could see him go stiff with what looks like a fencing response.
    Being out cold is no excuse for fumbling, apparently.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hurkeynuts
    Good, I won't have to be worried about the running backs fumbling every time they get the ball.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gebobs
    Take a rest, Fred. You got a case of the fumbly wumblies, but I still love ya.

  27. Post thanked by:

    jimmifli (11-12-2012)

  28. #19
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,587
    Thanks
    30,423
    Thanked 30,467 Times in 17,375 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Quote Originally Posted by Mski View Post
    Nix made a comment last week about getting CJ the ball more and the Media and it was something along the lines of """all you guys clamoring for CJ to get the ball more will be the same ones blaiming us for usuing him too much if he gets hurt"""

    now while i'm not a media member, but just and avg joe who's been saying that CJ should be the #1 back no questions asked... (the guy is still averaging over 7ypc... keep giving him the ball until he proves that its just an fluke/product of too few carries to long runs) but i certainly wouldnt blame the coach/FO if he got hurt in a game, and i know the guys on WGR laughed when they heard that too
    Yeah, I caught that Sunday AM on the pre-game.

  29. #20
    BoB Sabermetrician BLeonard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ft. Wayne, IN
    Posts
    4,625
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,813 Times in 944 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    32

    Re: Gailey: Fred Jackson will not play this week

    Quote Originally Posted by Mski View Post
    Nix made a comment last week about getting CJ the ball more and the Media and it was something along the lines of "all you guys clamoring for CJ to get the ball more will be the same ones blaiming us for usuing him too much if he gets hurt"
    Apparently, Nix must have forgotten that Spiller got hurt in week 3 against Cleveland... I don't recall anyone saying "See, we used him too much and now he's hurt!"

    Now, if the Bills were running him 50 times a game, he might have a point... But, in how many games has Spiller even gotten double digit carries?

    Hell, if Spiller got 15/5 (15 carries, 5 passes thrown to him) I wouldn't be complaining... But, how many games has he even gotten that?

    -Bill

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •