If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
That was on TJ, you have to cross the DBs face, you can't run behind him when the back of the endzone is an extra defender. Still a poor decision to target a rookie. Bad luck with the injuries..
I think it depends on the play call, but on this one it was clear that Fitz expected Graham to cut under the safety and he went behind him instead.
The bigger problem is why we're targeting a smallish receiver on post, Graham's not going to body up a DB. We have no depth at receiver, that's the issue.
No he wasn't, D baited throw and Fitz took it. Bad decision, bad throw, bad route.
I'll agree with the bad route, but this offense's bread & butter, especially inside the opponent's 30, is receivers cutting across the face of the defender.
YardRat Wall of Fame #56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
Yes because we've never seen Fitz throw a ball based on what he read pre-snap just to see the D bait him and make a play on it. How many times do you want to see the same damn thing before you realize its now always the call or WR's fault? He never even attempted a progression after the D changed. You noticed Graham doesn't cross the face, but don't care the Fitz still throws that pass? That's just being ridiculous.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
I'll agree with the bad route, but this offense's bread & butter, especially inside the opponent's 30, is receivers cutting across the face of the defender.
Yes pre-snap showed it was the perfect route, at the snap they adjust and Graham goes behind the defender. As the QB you have to see the adjustment and not still throw the ball.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Yes because we've never seen Fitz throw a ball based on what he read pre-snap just to see the D bait him and make a play on it. How many times do you want to see the same damn thing before you realize its now always the call or WR's fault? He never even attempted a progression after the D changed. You noticed Graham doesn't cross the face, but don't care the Fitz still throws that pass? That's just being ridiculous.
Its called a timing route. And the right coverage was there for a completion but Graham goes the wrong way. Its very obvious. Fitz was fine on that play. If Graham goes under its caught.
Its called a timing route. And the right coverage was there for a completion but Graham goes the wrong way. Its very obvious. Fitz was fine on that play. If Graham goes under its caught.
No it wasn't the right coverage that's the point. What they showed pre-snap was a disguise for what they were doing. Fitz never read the adjustment and neither did Graham. Its a horrible throw, horrible decision, and horrible route.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
No it wasn't the right coverage that's the point. What they showed pre-snap was a disguise for what they were doing. Fitz never read the adjustment and neither did Graham. Its a horrible throw, horrible decision, and horrible route.
I actually think if fitz threw it to a better spot he was open. just had to throw it to the back of the endzone. No one will know if he ran the wrong route or not except the team when they look at the tape.
Agreed, we don't know what route it was or what he's suppose to do if it's not there, if anything it looked like a case of trying to force something that wasn't there and as far as Fitz being the only reason we were in that game, I disagree, aside from the receivers making him look good all day, Spiller and Jackson were the reason we were in that game. I'm still disgusted that Spiller gets only 13 touches, 9 runs and 4 receptions, what will it take to get it in Gaileys head that he is a playmaker and needs to be used.
Its called a timing route. And the right coverage was there for a completion but Graham goes the wrong way. Its very obvious. Fitz was fine on that play. If Graham goes under its caught.
No it wasn't the right coverage that's the point. What they showed pre-snap was a disguise for what they were doing. Fitz never read the adjustment and neither did Graham. Its a horrible throw, horrible decision, and horrible route.
There was plenty of space for either the over or under route to work. The problem was they weren't on same page.
Comment