Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 38

Thread: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

  1. #1
    Registered User jamze132's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    29,064
    Thanks
    7,740
    Thanked 5,843 Times in 3,496 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    104

    Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Lets play not to lose instead of playing to win. Yeah, that worked out. Again.

    So sick and damn tired of this bullshizer. Gailey either has no damn balls or no confidence in Fitz (which is totally understandable) which is absolutely holding this team back.

  2. #2
    Registered User BertSquirtgum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The North Woods
    Posts
    13,379
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 3,399 Times in 2,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    This ****** hitched his wagon to Putzputrid and should be fired just for that reason alone. Completely inept.

  3. Post thanked by:

    jlgarsh (12-09-2012),Novacane (12-09-2012)

  4. #3
    Registered User Beebe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    532
    Thanks
    237
    Thanked 87 Times in 51 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    14

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    How big was it for Chan not to go for the field goal earlier.

  5. Post thanked by:

    imbondz (12-09-2012),jamze132 (12-09-2012),Novacane (12-09-2012),Thurmal (12-09-2012)

  6. #4
    2020-2023 AFC East Champions! Historian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Upstairs
    Posts
    61,131
    Thanks
    32,747
    Thanked 28,241 Times in 15,405 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    206

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Lindell was pissed.

  7. #5
    Registered User BertSquirtgum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The North Woods
    Posts
    13,379
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 3,399 Times in 2,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by Historian View Post
    Lindell was pissed.
    I saw that too.

  8. #6
    Registered User Novacane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Dade City, FL
    Posts
    42,152
    Thanks
    13,218
    Thanked 12,386 Times in 7,271 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    129

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Wonder what loser Ralph will bring in next

  9. Post thanked by:

    trapezeus (12-09-2012)

  10. #7
    Registered User jamze132's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    29,064
    Thanks
    7,740
    Thanked 5,843 Times in 3,496 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    104

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Can't believe he pulled Lindell in that spot. Total pussy.

  11. #8
    Registered User Beebe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    L.A.
    Posts
    532
    Thanks
    237
    Thanked 87 Times in 51 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    14

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Fitz is just like a hooker she gets her money then sucks and swallows.

  12. #9
    Registered User billsburgh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    from Rochester now in Pittsburgh
    Posts
    3,560
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 66 Times in 36 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    37

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    during his press conference, Gaiey said he changed his mind becuase at first he was told that it was 50 yards, but then he saw it was 52 or 53. so he changed his mind becuase of 2 or 3 yards?

  13. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    230
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 34 Times in 16 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    16

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Of course Lindell was pissed. You & I & everyone else here realize that he had every right to be. Unfortunately, that moronic coach Gaily clearly has no faith in any of his players other than Fitzpatrick. And, we've seen over & over again where there gets him & the team. Only he just can't seem to grasp it. And isn't that the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over & over again & expecting a different result? Well, Gaily just doesn't seem to be able to accept the reality that putting the game in Fitz's hands is always going to result in a loss. So, he's GOT to go.

  14. #11
    Legendary Zoner trapezeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    19,525
    Thanks
    4,356
    Thanked 3,218 Times in 1,859 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    so this weeks time line

    nix on monday: i don't think we should change. we need to keep continuity
    Tuesday: gailey, i think we need to stay with it. keep fighting. 8-8 got the giants in in the year 1932. let's keep playing,
    Thursday : key player x is out.
    Sunday: bills roll over and die.

    rinse and repeat.

    buhbye chan. that game sealed your fate.

  15. Post thanked by:

    DynaPaul (12-10-2012),Novacane (12-09-2012),Skooby (12-09-2012)

  16. #12
    Registered User Novacane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Dade City, FL
    Posts
    42,152
    Thanks
    13,218
    Thanked 12,386 Times in 7,271 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    129

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by billsburgh View Post
    during his press conference, Gaiey said he changed his mind becuase at first he was told that it was 50 yards, but then he saw it was 52 or 53. so he changed his mind becuase of 2 or 3 yards?


    If our kickers only good for 50yds we need a new one

  17. #13
    Drew's my hero!
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,491
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked 62 Times in 42 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    ok, is chan gailey the worst corch in the post levy era? i don't see how there's any controversy about it, he is.

  18. Post thanked by:

    jlgarsh (12-09-2012)

  19. #14
    One Bills Drive, Georgia - 871 miles south of Orchard Park gebobs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    11,520
    Thanks
    6,740
    Thanked 6,455 Times in 3,965 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    46

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by Beebe View Post
    How big was it for Chan not to go for the field goal earlier.
    And why did he call a timeout to do so? Complete idiocy.

    I better not hear anyone here try and say football under Gailey is entertaining.
    Last edited by gebobs; 12-09-2012 at 03:28 PM.
    Lehner's history. He just doesn't know it yet.

  20. #15
    Registered User Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    9,184
    Thanks
    420
    Thanked 3,412 Times in 1,994 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    If he wasn't going to kick the FG he should have just gone for the first down. It was like 4th and 3. Punting from inside the 35 yd line is pathetic. I've tried to hold out hope for you Chan, but I'm tired of you.

  21. Post thanked by:

    HAMMER (12-09-2012),kishoph (12-09-2012)

  22. #16
    The Allen Era has begun.... no looking back now, come hell or high water! THE END OF ALL DAYS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    4,524
    Thanks
    1,010
    Thanked 1,174 Times in 546 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    35

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    dream on folks. Gaily will be here next year. I guarantee it.
    In my day we did not have self-esteem... we had self-respect, and no more of it then we earned.

  23. #17
    Skoobasaurus-Rex Skooby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Naples FL
    Posts
    22,278
    Thanks
    14,917
    Thanked 5,218 Times in 3,687 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    63

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by Why so Serious? View Post
    dream on folks. Gaily will be here next year. I guarantee it.
    We just need a little patience.

  24. #18
    I'm right, Miyagi is wrong. HAMMER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    8,132
    Thanks
    902
    Thanked 999 Times in 523 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    I understand not kicking a 52 yard field goal in 10-15 MPH winds, I don't understand punting. I also don't get the whole wait until the game is almost over before you go for 2 point conversions. The playing conservative thing just doesn't work for this team. Gailey just doesn't get it IMO.

  25. Post thanked by:

    jamze132 (12-10-2012)

  26. #19
    Peterman Sucks! Mr. Pink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    the fifth ring of hell
    Posts
    35,303
    Thanks
    2,755
    Thanked 10,254 Times in 6,469 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    97

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by Why so Serious? View Post
    dream on folks. Gaily will be here next year. I guarantee it.
    If so 2013 = A wasted season with zero chance at the playoffs.

    Actually, 2013 regardless of what we do this offseason has zero chance at the playoffs but if we go with Gailey it's gonna be a lameduck wasted year instead of a developmental year.

  27. Post thanked by:

    gebobs (12-09-2012),HAMMER (12-09-2012)

  28. #20
    Childish Fake Voter ICRockets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    12,676
    Thanks
    3,173
    Thanked 6,883 Times in 4,053 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by FunTimesYaY! View Post
    If so 2013 = A wasted season with zero chance at the playoffs.

    Actually, 2013 regardless of what we do this offseason has zero chance at the playoffs but if we go with Gailey it's gonna be a lameduck wasted year instead of a developmental year.
    I completely disagree. There is a playoff team on that field with better coaching and a competent quarterback. If we nail those decisions this offseason I think we see a 10-6 team.

  29. Post thanked by:

    jlgarsh (12-09-2012),kishoph (12-09-2012),streetkings01 (12-09-2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •