Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Redskins sign Barnett

  1. #1
    Without me it's just Awe so The King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    41,013
    Thanks
    143
    Thanked 2,571 Times in 1,223 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    196

    Redskins sign Barnett

    The Redskins signed former Bills LB Nick Barnett. - Adam Schefter
    I remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?"
    "Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet.
    You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times."
    It was all
    true what he was saying. And yet, I thought something is brewing inside the head of this Coach.
    He sees something in me, some kind of raw talent that he can
    mold. But that's when I felt the handcuffs go on.



  2. #2
    This will all end in tears. ParanoidAndroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Hyattsville, MD
    Posts
    8,395
    Thanks
    913
    Thanked 1,095 Times in 653 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Cool.

  3. #3
    Hall of Fame Zoner coastal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,759
    Thanks
    7,722
    Thanked 4,804 Times in 2,726 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Joeymama loves him some Barnett.

    between Barnett and Fletcher, that defense is going to be unstoppable.

  4. #4
    What's a Bieber?
    Dr. Lecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Parts Unknown, Weight Unknown
    Posts
    57,037
    Thanks
    4,837
    Thanked 5,930 Times in 2,811 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    249

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    I hope he makes it, but next to Aaron Williams he might have been the worst player on the Bills starting defense last year.
    Quote Originally Posted by mysticsoto
    Lecter is right in everything he said.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,691
    Thanks
    9,758
    Thanked 3,631 Times in 2,423 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    52

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Lecter View Post
    I hope he makes it, but next to Aaron Williams he might have been the worst player on the Bills starting defense last year.
    I agree he had a terrible year last year but he played well the year before.

    Did he have an injury last year we didn't know about?

    Or did his skills decline so badly in one year?

    Or was it the terrible defense Wanny installed?

  6. #6
    Without me it's just Awe so The King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    41,013
    Thanks
    143
    Thanked 2,571 Times in 1,223 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    196

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Barnett just couldn't cover any ground last year. He was the equivalent of a traffic cone.

  7. #7
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    19,363
    Thanks
    1,732
    Thanked 448 Times in 287 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    53

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Except, occasionally, a traffic cone might manage to take someone down by tripping them.
    www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

  8. #8
    Registered User jimmifli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,776
    Thanks
    4,664
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 1,751 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    18

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by coastal View Post
    Joeymama loves him some Barnett.

    between Barnett and Fletcher, that defense is going to be unstoppable.
    I liked both of them. Since they were both the best LB's on the team when they left. Fletcher was better and had more left in the tank but I still don't see how our team got better by cutting him.

  9. #9
    What's a Bieber?
    Dr. Lecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Parts Unknown, Weight Unknown
    Posts
    57,037
    Thanks
    4,837
    Thanked 5,930 Times in 2,811 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    249

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmifli View Post
    I liked both of them. Since they were both the best LB's on the team when they left. Fletcher was better and had more left in the tank but I still don't see how our team got better by cutting him.
    Fletcher - yes

    Barnett - no

    As bad as the LBs were last year, he might have been the worst. He was horrendous. He lost a step and was way too slow

  10. #10
    Registered User Meathead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Outer space
    Posts
    20,700
    Thanks
    3,217
    Thanked 3,440 Times in 1,857 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    69

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    for his first year barnett kinda reminded me of takeo spikes. for his second year he reminded me of eddie robinson
    "Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one."

  11. #11
    What was that noise ? Mace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    3,972
    Thanks
    3,749
    Thanked 2,934 Times in 1,675 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    11

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    I like Barnett, he played 90 some percent of the snaps in a ridiculously rigid incompetent defense with the only other linebacker, if there was one being Scott, who if he wasn't a linebacker on the play was surely the db backing Barnett in coverage because he was so essentially vital to Wannstedt's "do the same stuff every play because I am confused" defense.

    The coverage was essentially "you stand there until something happens or you run at them if you think other stuff is happening", a key way to use an lb in his 30's who is the only linebacker linebacking but you insist runs right when all the opponent tight ends run left, or left when they run right, then note his stats were not up to par.

    Barnett wasn't the problem, none of them were, not even Scott, the defense was, and I wouldn't be real surprised to see Barnett do well for a few more years.

    But come on, stop this "Barnett was bad" stuff. He played over 90 percent of the snaps and the next closest LB who wasn't an LB was Scott less than 60%. Barnett, who he is, played the whole season in a Wannstedt nickel. He's not God's gift to linebackers, but he was hardly so bad being a 30 something lb who wasn't going to suddenly become Lawrence Taylor in his prime, and no one in their right mind thought we were getting Taylor in his prime to begin with, but it's trendy to say he did poorly for not being superman on a Wannstedt defense.

    Good luck to Nick Barnett.

  12. Post thanked by:

    jimmifli (08-02-2013)

  13. #12
    Registered User jimmifli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,776
    Thanks
    4,664
    Thanked 3,712 Times in 1,751 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    18

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Lecter View Post
    Fletcher - yes

    Barnett - no

    As bad as the LBs were last year, he might have been the worst. He was horrendous. He lost a step and was way too slow
    I think we established pretty quickly that he couldn't cover a TE. It might take Wanny about 3 seasons to figure that out.

    I'm not saying he is good, but he was much better than Shep. I think Bradham was probably our best LB, but he didn't get much chance until later in the season. The rest are terrible.

    We've got $21 million in cap space, and Barnett would have been fine as bench depth. We got worse by cutting him.

  14. #13
    Registered User Fixxxer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    554
    Thanks
    365
    Thanked 267 Times in 139 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    15

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    I liked Barnett as a player, though, he wasn't always put in a great position to succeed, IMO. He gave his all for the Bills on and off the field and you have to respect that.

    Best of luck to him with the Redskins.

  15. #14
    implacable indignation Swiper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    6,407
    Thanks
    2,737
    Thanked 2,460 Times in 1,634 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Lecter View Post
    I hope he makes it, but next to Aaron Williams he might have been the worst player on the Bills starting defense last year.
    He was good the year prior to Wannstedt taking over the defense.

  16. Post thanked by:

    jimmifli (08-04-2013)

  17. #15
    Registered User Night Train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Last Depot
    Posts
    18,926
    Thanks
    2,514
    Thanked 3,824 Times in 1,862 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    79

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    He's a great guy and I wish him all the best.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •