Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Redskins sign Barnett

  1. #1
    Without me it's just Awe so The King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    40,978
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 2,562 Times in 1,217 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    194

    Redskins sign Barnett

    The Redskins signed former Bills LB Nick Barnett. - Adam Schefter
    I remember that one fateful day when Coach took me aside. I knew what was coming. "You don't have to tell me," I said. "I'm off the team, aren't I?"
    "Well," said Coach, "you never were really ON the team. You made that uniform you're wearing out of rags and towels, and your helmet is a toy space helmet.
    You show up at practice and then either steal the ball and make us chase you to get it back, or you try to tackle people at inappropriate times."
    It was all
    true what he was saying. And yet, I thought something is brewing inside the head of this Coach.
    He sees something in me, some kind of raw talent that he can
    mold. But that's when I felt the handcuffs go on.



  2. #2
    This will all end in tears. ParanoidAndroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Hyattsville, MD
    Posts
    8,344
    Thanks
    881
    Thanked 1,067 Times in 637 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Cool.

  3. #3
    Hall of Fame Zoner coastal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,392
    Thanks
    7,332
    Thanked 4,596 Times in 2,590 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    26

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Joeymama loves him some Barnett.

    between Barnett and Fletcher, that defense is going to be unstoppable.

  4. #4
    What's a Bieber? Dr. Lecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Parts Unknown, Weight Unknown
    Posts
    56,887
    Thanks
    4,750
    Thanked 5,786 Times in 2,732 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    248

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    I hope he makes it, but next to Aaron Williams he might have been the worst player on the Bills starting defense last year.
    Quote Originally Posted by mysticsoto
    Lecter is right in everything he said.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,104
    Thanks
    9,279
    Thanked 3,426 Times in 2,283 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    51

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Lecter View Post
    I hope he makes it, but next to Aaron Williams he might have been the worst player on the Bills starting defense last year.
    I agree he had a terrible year last year but he played well the year before.

    Did he have an injury last year we didn't know about?

    Or did his skills decline so badly in one year?

    Or was it the terrible defense Wanny installed?

  6. #6
    Without me it's just Awe so The King's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    40,978
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 2,562 Times in 1,217 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    194

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Barnett just couldn't cover any ground last year. He was the equivalent of a traffic cone.

  7. #7
    Sab and TD are insignificant ublinkwescore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Atwater, Ca.
    Posts
    19,346
    Thanks
    1,703
    Thanked 442 Times in 283 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    53

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Except, occasionally, a traffic cone might manage to take someone down by tripping them.
    www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

  8. #8
    Registered User jimmifli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,693
    Thanks
    4,517
    Thanked 3,639 Times in 1,706 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by coastal View Post
    Joeymama loves him some Barnett.

    between Barnett and Fletcher, that defense is going to be unstoppable.
    I liked both of them. Since they were both the best LB's on the team when they left. Fletcher was better and had more left in the tank but I still don't see how our team got better by cutting him.

  9. #9
    What's a Bieber? Dr. Lecter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Parts Unknown, Weight Unknown
    Posts
    56,887
    Thanks
    4,750
    Thanked 5,786 Times in 2,732 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    248

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmifli View Post
    I liked both of them. Since they were both the best LB's on the team when they left. Fletcher was better and had more left in the tank but I still don't see how our team got better by cutting him.
    Fletcher - yes

    Barnett - no

    As bad as the LBs were last year, he might have been the worst. He was horrendous. He lost a step and was way too slow

  10. #10
    certified social gadfly Meathead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Outer space
    Posts
    20,425
    Thanks
    2,978
    Thanked 3,288 Times in 1,763 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    for his first year barnett kinda reminded me of takeo spikes. for his second year he reminded me of eddie robinson
    "Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one."

  11. #11
    Haha, but seriously... Mace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    3,618
    Thanks
    3,364
    Thanked 2,643 Times in 1,496 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    10

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    I like Barnett, he played 90 some percent of the snaps in a ridiculously rigid incompetent defense with the only other linebacker, if there was one being Scott, who if he wasn't a linebacker on the play was surely the db backing Barnett in coverage because he was so essentially vital to Wannstedt's "do the same stuff every play because I am confused" defense.

    The coverage was essentially "you stand there until something happens or you run at them if you think other stuff is happening", a key way to use an lb in his 30's who is the only linebacker linebacking but you insist runs right when all the opponent tight ends run left, or left when they run right, then note his stats were not up to par.

    Barnett wasn't the problem, none of them were, not even Scott, the defense was, and I wouldn't be real surprised to see Barnett do well for a few more years.

    But come on, stop this "Barnett was bad" stuff. He played over 90 percent of the snaps and the next closest LB who wasn't an LB was Scott less than 60%. Barnett, who he is, played the whole season in a Wannstedt nickel. He's not God's gift to linebackers, but he was hardly so bad being a 30 something lb who wasn't going to suddenly become Lawrence Taylor in his prime, and no one in their right mind thought we were getting Taylor in his prime to begin with, but it's trendy to say he did poorly for not being superman on a Wannstedt defense.

    Good luck to Nick Barnett.

  12. Post thanked by:

    jimmifli (08-02-2013)

  13. #12
    Registered User jimmifli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,693
    Thanks
    4,517
    Thanked 3,639 Times in 1,706 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Lecter View Post
    Fletcher - yes

    Barnett - no

    As bad as the LBs were last year, he might have been the worst. He was horrendous. He lost a step and was way too slow
    I think we established pretty quickly that he couldn't cover a TE. It might take Wanny about 3 seasons to figure that out.

    I'm not saying he is good, but he was much better than Shep. I think Bradham was probably our best LB, but he didn't get much chance until later in the season. The rest are terrible.

    We've got $21 million in cap space, and Barnett would have been fine as bench depth. We got worse by cutting him.

  14. #13
    Registered User Fixxxer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    547
    Thanks
    360
    Thanked 259 Times in 136 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    14

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    I liked Barnett as a player, though, he wasn't always put in a great position to succeed, IMO. He gave his all for the Bills on and off the field and you have to respect that.

    Best of luck to him with the Redskins.

  15. #14
    implacable indignation
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    5,874
    Thanks
    2,478
    Thanked 2,275 Times in 1,505 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Lecter View Post
    I hope he makes it, but next to Aaron Williams he might have been the worst player on the Bills starting defense last year.
    He was good the year prior to Wannstedt taking over the defense.

  16. Post thanked by:

    jimmifli (08-04-2013)

  17. #15
    Registered User Night Train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Last Depot
    Posts
    18,822
    Thanks
    2,474
    Thanked 3,728 Times in 1,808 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    77

    Re: Redskins sign Barnett

    He's a great guy and I wish him all the best.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •