New stadium rumors
Collapse
X
-
Re: New stadium rumors
I'm so glad the article mentions Batavia. I've been screaming for that for 10 years.
Buy Batavia Downs. Raze it. Build Ralph II. Better yet, Rich II. Or Pegula Stadium.
It's prefect. Easily accessible from the NYS Thruway. Rochester and Syracuse are far more interesting markets to cultivate than Canada, IMO.
Raise the speed limit to 75 mph, done and done.
-
👍 1
-
-
Re: New stadium rumors
Originally posted by WagonCircler View PostI'm so glad the article mentions Batavia. I've been screaming for that for 10 years.
Buy Batavia Downs. Raze it. Build Ralph II. Better yet, Rich II. Or Pegula Stadium.
It's prefect. Easily accessible from the NYS Thruway. Rochester and Syracuse are far more interesting markets to cultivate than Canada, IMO.
Raise the speed limit to 75 mph, done and done.
In the long run, it's better to have better transportation outside of driving. all these roads cost a lot and are inefficient manner of getting around. buffalo and NYS are thinking further ahead than 5 years. It has to be about spending tax money correctly to build a stadium, not simply to save a team.
a stadium downtown, with low tax zones to spur restaurants and shops, is way better for the region than having the ralph placed in another podunk outskirt and expecting people to drive everywhere. it's not very forward looking, in my opinion.
-
👍 5
Comment
-
-
Re: New stadium rumors
Originally posted by WagonCircler View PostI'm so glad the article mentions Batavia. I've been screaming for that for 10 years.
Buy Batavia Downs. Raze it. Build Ralph II. Better yet, Rich II. Or Pegula Stadium.
It's prefect. Easily accessible from the NYS Thruway. Rochester and Syracuse are far more interesting markets to cultivate than Canada, IMO.
Raise the speed limit to 75 mph, done and done.
meh. People won't be flying in to go hang out in cowpile country. Downtown buffalo would be ideal but I'm okay with niagara. People would want to fly in with their family for the weekend and see the falls +++ .Last edited by justasportsfan; 04-11-2014, 11:56 AM.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: New stadium rumors
Originally posted by Novacane View PostI agree. They'd have to build a ton of infrastructure to make Batavia accessible for 70000 people. Downtown Buffalo is the where the stadium should be.
I disagree on the infrastructure, but agree somewhat on the Downtown Buffalo part.
I go back and forth on what my #1 choice is, but for now:
1a. Orchard Park- A total rebuild, in stages, on the current site, with a retractible roof.
1b. Bethlehem Steel site/Outer Harbor- Brownfields funds available to clean up, plenty of land. Would hopefully spur some adjacent development. Kills two birds with one stone.
2. Batavia- As I stated above, the infrastructure is already there. Batavia Downs site is right on the Thruway. There are already motels and more room for more. Nobody coming to podunk town? What is Orchard Park? Paris?
3. Niagara Falls- I'm fine with it, but I think the infrastructure needed would be a nightmare. It's already an epic clusterf... I can't imagine what it would take to make a stadium work.
The only reason I brought up Batavia in the thread is that it's a very viable option that nobody ever talks about.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: New stadium rumors
Originally posted by WagonCircler View PostI'm so glad the article mentions Batavia. I've been screaming for that for 10 years.
Buy Batavia Downs. Raze it. Build Ralph II. Better yet, Rich II. Or Pegula Stadium.
It's prefect. Easily accessible from the NYS Thruway. Rochester and Syracuse are far more interesting markets to cultivate than Canada, IMO.
Raise the speed limit to 75 mph, done and done.
Comment
-
-
Re: New stadium rumors
Originally posted by WagonCircler View PostI disagree on the infrastructure, but agree somewhat on the Downtown Buffalo part.
I go back and forth on what my #1 choice is, but for now:
1a. Orchard Park- A total rebuild, in stages, on the current site, with a retractible roof.
1b. Bethlehem Steel site/Outer Harbor- Brownfields funds available to clean up, plenty of land. Would hopefully spur some adjacent development. Kills two birds with one stone.
2. Batavia- As I stated above, the infrastructure is already there. Batavia Downs site is right on the Thruway. There are already motels and more room for more. Nobody coming to podunk town? What is Orchard Park? Paris?
3. Niagara Falls- I'm fine with it, but I think the infrastructure needed would be a nightmare. It's already an epic clusterf... I can't imagine what it would take to make a stadium work.
The only reason I brought up Batavia in the thread is that it's a very viable option that nobody ever talks about.
buffalo is making the right moves of late. keep it going and build in the city or in niagara falls.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: New stadium rumors
Those of you clamoring for a downtown stadium: have you ever actually been to a sporting event at a downtown stadium before?
I've been to baseball and football games in DC and Baltimore plenty of times.
Advantages: stuff to do before and after the game.
Disadvantages: pretty much everything else. Parking and public transportation are both woefully insufficient. Traffic is terrible. There is no tailgating culture because the only people who can afford the lots close to the stadium aren't exactly the typical tailgating type. And pregaming at a bar is much more expensive than tailgating.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: New stadium rumors
Just go with the falls. Plenty of land and crappy adjacent housing that could be purchased and the mafia there is very greasable... more so than the NFTA.
Any word on the Summit Park Mall site Plenty of land and parking from what I remember unless that got all built up prior to the mall tankingLast edited by sukie; 04-11-2014, 01:18 PM.
Comment
-
-
Re: New stadium rumors
Lots more revenue if it's downtown since people would go out to eat, drink, etc. Easier access for out of towners. Tailgating is not as fun.
Niagra Falls would make it easier for Canadians and could increase fan base and ticket sales as result.
Comment
-
Comment