Nice to make this blatantly racist. "only blacks and hispanics are committing crimes." When the facts are violent crimes are down 44% from the late 70's.
Urbanization is up after years of people leaving. There is an idea that years of creating 100's of suburbs creates an impossibly expensive infrastructure issue. Leaving cities in decay isn't the long term goal for most municipalities.
You can repeat it until the cows come home, but once again, I doubt it. At any rate, who cares? If the stadium is in Buffalo, they can still tailgate. You seem to want to to broaden the appeal on one hand and then limit it on the other to just tailgaters.
So what? The majority of the fans live closer to Buffalo than Batavia. If you want to appeal to a region by building the stadium in Batavia, you're going to have to build your case. How is building in Batavia going to broaden the regional appeal? As far as I can tell, this is just to appeal to Syracuse and Rochester at the expense of the Canadian and Souther Tier fan bases.The majority of fans that fill the Stadium do not live in the City of Buffalo.
Lehner's history. He just doesn't know it yet.
I doubt it would take Canadians any longer to get to Batavia than it does to Orchard Park.
I don't have stats, but I have never heard Russ say anything about the Southern tier so I think MANY more Bills fans are located from Rochester to Syracuse than in the Southern tier.
As far as tailgating goes, it does not matter what you think. I think few people would be jazzed about the idea of spending more money at a restaurant rather than tailgating myself.
Who's talking about OP? We're talking about a new stadium. Barring traffic and bridges, it takes 2 hours to get from Hamilton to Batavia, 1:15 to Buffalo, 1:30 to OP.
For Syracuse, those times are 1:45, 2:15, 2:25. Big whoop.
I said "at the expense of the Canadian and Southern Tier fan bases". What's so great about Syracuse? Hamilton is twice the size and half as far.I don't have stats, but I have never heard Russ say anything about the Southern tier so I think MANY more Bills fans are located from Rochester to Syracuse than in the Southern tier.
Let's just say it's your opinion that "few people" would disagree with you ok?As far as tailgating goes, it does not matter what you think. I think few people would be jazzed about the idea of spending more money at a restaurant rather than tailgating myself.
Why do you insist only on catering to people that share your idea of the perfect Bills game? If you want to broaden the appeal to the region, why not broaden it to include those people that don't mind spending money at a restaurant instead of swilling beer outside? What about the people that would be so willing to invest the time to travel hundreds of miles to see the game that would just as soon not spend several hours out in the elements? Why are you so intent on limiting the experience to just those folks that are like minded with you?
Last edited by gebobs; 04-16-2014 at 05:12 PM.
The western new york buffalo bills. I like it. I don't care where they move as long as they remain in western new york.
The more I read in this thread, the more I like the Outer Harbor.
Close to Downton (seriously, who's kidding who here? It IS Downtown) for hotels and restaurants? check.
Plenty of room for parking and tailgating? check.
Added benefit of getting some much needed infrastructure done that benefits taxpayers year round? check.
Doesn't push anyone out, no need to buy up/raze residences or businesses.
I really fail to see much of a downside. People who want to tailgate can tailgate. People who want to stay overnight can stay overnight.
I think it would even be reasonably easy to extend the Metro Rail or build a pedestrian bridge from the current terminus.
If there's one part of Buffalo that's growing, it's the harbor. This would add some momentum to that.
But like I've said in pretty much every post, I'm cool with anything within 45 miles of Downtown. Because it means the Bills will be here for pretty much the rest of my life.
gebobs (04-16-2014),THATHURMANATOR (04-17-2014),trapezeus (04-17-2014)
i think the pond hockey tourney's etc during the weekend of a home bills game would put a lot of bodies downtown. There is just a lot of growth aside from the bills if done downtown. anywhere else (aside from niagara falls), the benefits are very limited and only in the interests of the owners of the bills. that's not a fair deal for tax payers.
Again why are we talking about something done 40 years ago I don't know why they built it there but it is 10 minutes from buffalo at least.
Buffalo is a freaking metropolis compared to cow town batavia lets be real
Sorry those of you from batavia. It is what it is. I like batavia actually but there is zero chance they would build the stadium there. Who would fund it?
Can this thread be closed already?
gebobs (04-18-2014)
The Dallas Cowboys practice and have their offices in Valley Ranch and play in Arlington, 20 miles away.
UB is lower on my list than most, but there's no reason it couldn't work. But I really don't see Amherst residents or local gov't being crazy about the idea.
Plus, Big Blue Water Tower is about the only genuine traffic spot in WNY. Seems like asking for trouble on game day.
DraftBoy (04-18-2014)
If you claim to being a city is a Home Dept, Bed Bath & Beyond and a Casino then I think you need to revisit your claim.
Is Batavia providing any essential services for their community or is that all County based? That's where you start in knowing if you have a real city or if you're just a random town.
gebobs (04-18-2014)
gebobs (04-18-2014)
For the record, I don't live in Buffalo and will never live there again so I don't have a ton of care about where the new stadium goes but Wagon's option of the Outer Harbor sounds like by far the best option to me.