If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
So you start this thread by saying that the reason the Bills couldn't win last year is because the WR's couldn't manage more than 3 TD's a piece, and now you're saying how good they are.
So you start this thread by saying that the reason the Bills couldn't win last year is because the WR's couldn't manage more than 3 TD's a piece, and now you're saying how good they are.
Your bias is nauseating.
WOW, you posted about how NO WR can do much with bad QB play.
Well, why don't you research that & post it for us.
I don't know necessarily that every team with two receivers with more than 3 TDs puts up a winning record, But I can pretty much guarantee that no team without at least one receiver putting up a LOT of TD's
will have a losing record.
And I really believe both Watkins & Williams will put up a number of TD's.
So, for the 2nd time tonight, you make a claim with no facts or information to back it up, then when you get called out on it, you demand that the person who called you out does all the research to prove the point you attempted to make.
Although I do expect Watkins & Williams to put up better numbers.
I'm not calling it an assumption.
What you said is an assumption by definition. A fact is something that can be proven objectively and repeatedly. What you said certainly does not meet that criteria, and you even put a caveat on your statement yourself by saying Watkins and Williams will do better.
Opinions still need something to support them to be taken seriously.
Some opinions are based on using facts and history to come to a logical conclusion. Other opinions are based on emotion and desire. Not all opinions are equally valid.
Opinions still need something to support them to be taken seriously.
Some opinions are based on using facts and history to come to a logical conclusion. Other opinions are based on emotion and desire. Not all opinions are equally valid.
Well, you are right. So how was your opinion that the Bills should have kept Donald Jones working out for you?
Well, you are right. So how was your opinion that the Bills should have kept Donald Jones working out for you?
My opinion was not that the Bills should keep Donald Jones.
My opinion was that going into the season with a rookie QB and Stevie Johnson, sophomore TJ Graham and a bunch of rookies at WR was a bad idea. I said we needed more experience at WR to support EJ. You assumed that meant keeping Donald Jones, but, contrary to your belief, Donald Jones is not the only experienced WR in the NFL.
Oh, and remember that this thread started with you saying that no WR on this team had more than 3 tds. So... maybe, just maybe, more experience at WR would have been beneficial. Hmmmm...
My opinion was not that the Bills should keep Donald Jones.
My opinion was that going into the season with a rookie QB and Stevie Johnson, sophomore TJ Graham and a bunch of rookies at WR was a bad idea. I said we needed more experience at WR to support EJ. You assumed that meant keeping Donald Jones, but, contrary to your belief, Donald Jones is not the only experienced WR in the NFL.
Oh, and remember that this thread started with you saying that no WR on this team had more than 3 tds. So... maybe, just maybe, more experience at WR would have been beneficial. Hmmmm...
Show us you said experienced receivers aside from Donald Jones.
I remember going around & around with you about Jones.
Your position was that Jones was experienced.
My position was that yes Jones was experienced but MEDIOCRE.
I said a talented rookie would be better to have than a mediocre vet.
And I still say that. A more experienced WR with TALENT would have helped Manuel, but not a mediocre one.
Tweet
Comment