Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

Can we discuss this like adults and not make dumb, insulting comments?

[feldspar]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

Can we discuss this like adults and not make dumb, insulting comments?

Probably not.

[Historian]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

The Bills record in Oakland in the 70's, 80's, 90's, and 00's is meaningless.

Not necessarily.

There has to be some sort of reason why they haven't won there since 1965...or why we couldn't beat the Fish in the 70's, never won in Chicago, nor why we have a losing record in Tampa.

It tells me they're tough places to play in, and no matter how good or bad the team is, you have to acknowledge the streak.

The Bills have done a good job exercising demons this year. I hope they keep it up, but a west coast game is no gimme.

[Novacane]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

Can we discuss this like adults and not make dumb, insulting comments?

notacon is involved so not likely

[stuckincincy]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

notacon is involved so not likely

You are right. I'd like to see him/her tossed into one of his socialist paradises. He'd be a scullery maid, and if cute enough, would be dragged upstairs to the local Commissar for a buggery session.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

I cracked up when I saw this thread at the top.

I love the win but if you listened to NY radio, like I did (was on a plane yesterday) I have to say that the Bills did everything in their power to lose this game. The NY annoucers were like "how are the Bills not running away with this game?"

I'm sorry but our offense (blame it on the OC) is a nightmare.

I'm sticking with 7-9. I think the games that we've squeeked out wins in, this game included, will be balanced out by the ones down the road that we won't.

funny, you are sticking with what you heard on the radio because in your head, you wanted to be right about the bills losing to the jets.

The bills may have not ran away with the game in the first half but they made the right adjustments in the 2nd half.

[justasportsfan]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

Can we discuss this like adults and not make dumb, insulting comments?

where's the fun in that?

[notacon]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

This is entertaining, just how how unreasonable you are being.

Keep it up, extremely successful sales guy.

The Bills have an 80% chance of losing in Oakland, and that's reality.

Reality is also that you have a 99.9% chance of being a total hump.

If I'm a baby, what do grown men do? Suck your dick?

Looking at your posts this morning, and you are calling me "unreasonable"?!?! Really?? Jesus. My prediction is not only "reasonable" it's more probable than not.

Maybe you should look up these big words before you use them.

You are a "baby" in the sense that you are acting monumentally immature.

Can we discuss this like adults and not make dumb, insulting comments?

I have not insulted one poster here. I have been attacked relentlessly.

Probably not.

Obviously.

Not necessarily.

There has to be some sort of reason why they haven't won there since 1965...or why we couldn't beat the Fish in the 70's, never won in Chicago, nor why we have a losing record in Tampa.

It tells me they're tough places to play in, and no matter how good or bad the team is, you have to acknowledge the streak.

The Bills have done a good job exercising demons this year. I hope they keep it up, but a west coast game is no gimme.

A beacon of "reason". What I think is an important factor is the schedule. Traveling virtually across the country twice over a little over two weeks, and playing two very, very good football teams. The Oakland game smells like a let down from a mile away.

notacon is involved so not likely

I have not insulted one poster here. All I have gotten, in this and other threads on the football side of this forum, is relentless attacks, insults and vilification. Yes, I defend myself from time to time...but...mostly I take them with a grain of salt.

You are right. I'd like to see him/her tossed into one of his socialist paradises. He'd be a scullery maid, and if cute enough, would be dragged upstairs to the local Commissar for a buggery session.

Do you any idea what "socialist" means?!?! I have never, and I mean, NEVER supported any kind of "socialism". Period.

It is the ignorant that jump to conclusions on something they know nothing about...and based on that ignorance, make silly and inappropriate labels.

[better days]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

I cracked up when I saw this thread at the top.

I love the win but if you listened to NY radio, like I did (was on a plane yesterday) I have to say that the Bills did everything in their power to lose this game. The NY annoucers were like "how are the Bills not running away with this game?"

I'm sorry but our offense (blame it on the OC) is a nightmare.

I'm sticking with 7-9. I think the games that we've squeeked out wins in, this game included, will be balanced out by the ones down the road that we won't.

As Justa said, you just want to be right when you were obviously wrong. And if you had actually seen the game you would have seen the Jets DOMINATED by the Bills.

I do agree Hackett called a terrible game, but the players overcame that.

You go ahead & stick to 7-9........just gives me one more person I can make fun of at the end of the season.

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

I

have not insulted one poster here. I have been attacked relentlessly.

I know that.

Hence why I asked people to tone it down. I don't have time to send out that many PM's right now

[feldspar]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

My prediction is not only "reasonable" it's more probable than not.

Of course your prediction is more probable than not...it's set at 80%. There is an 80% chance that the Raiders beat the Bills.

There can be no arguing with that. The math is in. The scientists have spoken.

I have not insulted one poster here.

Stop whining and jumping up and down like a baby. Get a grip and grow the **** up!!!!!!!!!!!!

Of course, these are not insults, right successful sales guy?

If I respected you, perhaps I would be offended.

[PromoTheRobot]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

Take the coaches, talent etc. out of this for a moment and just focus on our remaining schedule.

Oct 26 BUF @ NYJ LOSS
Bye
Nov 09 KC @ BUF LOSS
Nov 13 BUF @ MIA LOSS
Nov 23 NYJ @ BUF WIN
Nov 30 CLE @ BUF WIN
Dec 07 BUF @ DEN LOSS
Dec 14 GB @ BUF LOSS
Dec 21 BUF @ OAK WIN
Dec 28 BUF @ NE LOSS

The Jets have enough pride not to go 1-7. I'm sure they view this as a winnable game and certainly have ample time to prepare.

Being realistic I don't see a best case scenario better than 9-7, which would be a big accomplishement at this point.

[bdutton]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

I'm just going to put this here...



No... it goes there!

[swiper]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

Can we discuss this like adults and not make dumb, insulting comments?

You'd have to start by having mature, reasonable people.

[pmoon6]

Re: Count on a loss against the Jets, and a 7-9 season.

I would put in my two cents, but Feldspar is doing incredibly well.

Just a little tidbit, I didn't nickname Notacon, "Nutty" for nothin".