Hypothetical QB Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DesertFox24
    Registered User
    • Jul 2005
    • 2129

    Hypothetical QB Question

    All,

    Orton has played above average to good in his three starts. Yes he makes one bone head play a game but he has also done some really nice things. The turnover bug has really hit this team the last two weeks and had it not been for the Woods fumble and Ortons strip sack the game would have been tied at a minimum in my personal opinion. Take in the fact that Hogans resulted in points as well.

    All that aside if Orton keeps playing like this and actually starts to get more a rapport with the WRs, TE, and RBs is drafting a QB a must. Orton is 33 and probably has a good 4 years left after this year of being a decent player.

    Would the bills be wiser to draft a QB in the first round next year and let him groom under Orton for a few years and take over after 2 years on the bench learning?

    We are not bad enough to draft in the top 3 and I highly doubt we will be that bad for a long time, so the type of prospects we are looking at will be drafted in the 14 and up range.

    QBs fall every year so it is a possibility.
  • feldspar
    Registered User
    • Mar 2007
    • 13620

    #2
    Re: Hypothetical QB Question

    Actually, Kyle Orton is currently 31-years-old, not 33.

    We've seen what happens time and time again when teams draft QBs just because they need one. EJ Manuel is a good example...JP Losman is a worse example because we had Bledsoe at the time.

    So it all depends on who is available next year, whether it be in the draft or in free agency. Then there is the issue of whether the Bills feel that EJ is still waiting in the wings and learning, waiting for his next chance after he "grows" as a player, which does not exactly give me a warm feeling personally.

    The picture will become clearer after this season is over as to whether Orton is viable going into next year, weighing that with the actual options that are out there at the QB position. You can't just invent a guy to get, he has to be realistically available to the Bills.
    Last edited by feldspar; 10-21-2014, 03:07 PM.

    Comment

    • RedEyE
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 24661

      #3
      Re: Hypothetical QB Question

      First, the Bills do not have a 1st next season as they traded that away to Cleveland.

      Second, and more to the point of your thread, I'm inclined to not pick up a high round QB next season if Orton is panning out. Leave EJ on the bench for "training purposes". He provides adequate back-up depth. If Orton is panning out wait until 2016 to draft high round.

      Comment

      • better days
        Registered User
        • Jan 2010
        • 22028

        #4
        Re: Hypothetical QB Question

        The first question should be who will be the HC & OC next year.

        If the Bills win with Orton & make the playoffs, Marrone & Hackett stay put.

        At 8-8 or worse, I want to see Hackett gone at the very least.

        And when Marrone benched Manuel, he said it was about winning & the better guy should play...so why are Urbic & Mike Williams not playing?

        Comment

        • feldspar
          Registered User
          • Mar 2007
          • 13620

          #5
          Re: Hypothetical QB Question

          Originally posted by better days View Post
          And when Marrone benched Manuel, he said it was about winning & the better guy should play...so why are Urbic & Mike Williams not playing?
          I have a strong feeling that Morrone will start Urbik this week...finally. This Jets defense is tough up front on defense, no matter what the record says. Starting Urbik instead of Richardson is a no-brainer IMO. Good Lord. On the other hand, their secondary isn't exactly stellar...THAT, coupled with the Bills' running back situation says that the Bills should exploit the Jets secondary in the passing game, which means protecting the QB for that to work. Of course, a better line means better run-blocking as well. I'll be entirely pissed if I see Richardson start this week.

          Comment

          • Thurmal
            Registered User
            • Oct 2005
            • 2412

            #6
            Re: Hypothetical QB Question

            Orton, with a good line and a competent play-caller at OC would be a perfectly fine starter next year, especially given our defense.

            This team needs help at LB, S, G, and T before QB in my opinion.
            "Miami played pretty damn good today and still got their ass kicked."

            Comment

            • ServoBillieves
              The Voice of Reason
              • Jul 2007
              • 6106

              #7
              Re: Hypothetical QB Question

              Originally posted by Thurmal View Post
              Orton, with a good line and a competent play-caller at OC would be a perfectly fine starter next year, especially given our defense.

              This team needs help at LB, S, G, and T before QB in my opinion.
              I'm confused how LB and T need to be addressed. Guard is a given, Safety as well, and TE is the elephant in the room, but what's wrong with Kiko/Bradham/Spikes (if he stays)/Brown/Rivers? Glenn is good, Henderson was a steal and young, maybe KuJo pulls his head out of his ass?

              I'm not undermining or being a dick I'm seriously asking why you think LB and T are problems.
              Bye Bye Brady...

              Comment

              • starrymessenger
                Registered User
                • Oct 2009
                • 740

                #8
                Re: Hypothetical QB Question

                Bills are fortunate Orton was asleep on his couch when they finally realized they needed a QB.
                Amazing that after so long Bills fans are actually able to say for once that QB is not the problem (O-line is).
                Of course they need to draft and develop the next guy up.
                Unfortunately they absolutely lack the wherewithal to do that.
                That is reason enuf for the current crew to be sent packing.

                Comment

                • Fixxxer
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 676

                  #9
                  Re: Hypothetical QB Question

                  Originally posted by RedEyE View Post
                  First, the Bills do not have a 1st next season as they traded that away to Cleveland.

                  Second, and more to the point of your thread, I'm inclined to not pick up a high round QB next season if Orton is panning out. Leave EJ on the bench for "training purposes". He provides adequate back-up depth. If Orton is panning out wait until 2016 to draft high round.
                  I hope Pegula tells his employees to never rest on their laurels regarding the QB position. He needs to tell Whaley to keep scouting them and keep taking them if they really like one. We have a solid team right now, if there is some QB they like coming into next years draft they need to pull the trigger.

                  Comment

                  • RedEyE
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 24661

                    #10
                    Re: Hypothetical QB Question

                    Originally posted by Fixxxer View Post
                    I hope Pegula tells his employees to never rest on their laurels regarding the QB position. He needs to tell Whaley to keep scouting them and keep taking them if they really like one. We have a solid team right now, if there is some QB they like coming into next years draft they need to pull the trigger.
                    Oh, I totally agree. My thought is though, if Orton is workingfor us at an above average pace, I'd prefer to see the higher round picks 2015 (no 1st avail) used on something more pressing like OL, TE or a CB. Honestly watching college ball this year no one really impresses me at QB anyway.

                    Comment

                    • starrymessenger
                      Registered User
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 740

                      #11
                      Re: Hypothetical QB Question

                      Originally posted by Fixxxer View Post
                      I hope Pegula tells his employees to never rest on their laurels regarding the QB position. He needs to tell Whaley to keep scouting them and keep taking them if they really like one. We have a solid team right now, if there is some QB they like coming into next years draft they need to pull the trigger.
                      If they see a QB they really like they should avoid picking him at all cost.
                      these guys can neither pick nor develop a QB to save their lives or the franchise.
                      When asked what he saw that he liked in EJ Whaley went on about his "presence".
                      WTF. How about can he throw a football?

                      Comment

                      • YardRat
                        Well, lookie here...
                        • Dec 2004
                        • 86141

                        #12
                        Re: Hypothetical QB Question

                        Getting a QB is all about 'luck', in the context of Raymond Berry's definition. Be prepared to pull the trigger when the opportunity is there, but don't force it if it isn't. If a FA becomes available that they really love, by all means try and sign him. If one drops in their lap that is the best player on the board, draft him. Don't get so enamored by the position that it all of a sudden becomes a higher priority than it should be, at the expense of other talent at other positions.

                        Almost everybody wanted a first round QB. Almost everybody was slobbering over the prospect of being able to snag the 'pick of the litter' out of approximately four real 'contenders' (in their minds). Be careful what you wish for, you might actually get it.
                        YardRat Wall of Fame
                        #56 DARRYL TALLEY
                        #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

                        Comment

                        • trapezeus
                          Legendary Zoner
                          • Oct 2004
                          • 19525

                          #13
                          Re: Hypothetical QB Question

                          if Orton goes 8-8 or better, he's your starter next year. EJ is your back up and you should have another guy in the cards. if the best player available is QB when we draft at 2 or 7, that's where we get him.

                          Orton has to keep getting better, and EJ will see if he's long for the Bills or not. if the new draftee beats him out, he's done. if not, you keep 3 qbs.

                          if next sesason orton flames out which has a high probability due to his age at that point and his career stats, EJ either needs to prove he was worth the project or th ebills need to hope they are in position to draft in a deep class.

                          i think if you draft BPA, next draft through all rounds, we could use depth in all categories.

                          Comment

                          • DesertFox24
                            Registered User
                            • Jul 2005
                            • 2129

                            #14
                            Re: Hypothetical QB Question

                            Originally posted by RedEyE View Post
                            First, the Bills do not have a 1st next season as they traded that away to Cleveland.

                            Second, and more to the point of your thread, I'm inclined to not pick up a high round QB next season if Orton is panning out. Leave EJ on the bench for "training purposes". He provides adequate back-up depth. If Orton is panning out wait until 2016 to draft high round.
                            The first I mentioned was 2016. Hence my point, why draft a QB in 2015 when we can wait till 2016. If Orton continues to be above average to good I say ride with him. See how EJ progresses in 2015 and if not seeing it then draft a guy in 2016. Either way I think it would be good to resign Orton after the 2016 to either start mentor new rookie QB or backup EJ.

                            Comment

                            • DesertFox24
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2005
                              • 2129

                              #15
                              Re: Hypothetical QB Question

                              Originally posted by ServoBillieves View Post
                              I'm confused how LB and T need to be addressed. Guard is a given, Safety as well, and TE is the elephant in the room, but what's wrong with Kiko/Bradham/Spikes (if he stays)/Brown/Rivers? Glenn is good, Henderson was a steal and young, maybe KuJo pulls his head out of his ass?

                              I'm not undermining or being a dick I'm seriously asking why you think LB and T are problems.

                              LB and OT depending on what happens with Rivers/Spikes and Kuonjo (spelling). If CK moves to guard that will be hole we will need to fill.

                              In addition Eric Pears, Urbik, and Hairston are in last year of contract will need at least 3 OL to replace.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X
                              😀
                              😂
                              🥰
                              😘
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😞
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎