Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 48

Thread: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

  1. #21
    Legendary Zoner trapezeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    19,525
    Thanks
    4,356
    Thanked 3,218 Times in 1,859 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    regardless of the price, we actually have a WR where teams have to account for him and even when they do he can catch the ball. He also has been playing hurt as evidenced by his routine of going to the ground or out of bounds to avoid a hit.

    He isn't another long line of under talented guys who happens to be our #1. He would be any team's number 1 where they didn't have an established starter.

    would you have felt comfortable with Stevie being targeted for that TD with 1 second left? He was our #1. he's currently a #3 on a good team.

    and where you are looking for a game changing WR, he is still a rookie. even your precious benjamin gets this benefit. what you expect from a rookie WR is to be decent. Eric moulds first two years had 275-300 yards in receptions each yearas he learned the system. He had 2 TDs. But i guess his career of having almost 10000 yards was meaningless because he didn't meet fletch's stat's only view on the world.

    watkins catches anything remotely close to him and about 50% of the things no one else would even touch.

    Find me another wr that reliable. if he stays at his pace, we know we have a #1 wr and can go address other things. if we had benjamin, we would still be wondering if we can make him better by having another #1a/b WR to pair him with.

  2. Post thanked by:

    Albany,n.y. (10-24-2014)

  3. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,166
    Thanks
    787
    Thanked 527 Times in 417 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Quote Originally Posted by trapezeus View Post
    regardless of the price, we actually have a WR where teams have to account for him and even when they do he can catch the ball. He also has been playing hurt as evidenced by his routine of going to the ground or out of bounds to avoid a hit.

    He isn't another long line of under talented guys who happens to be our #1. He would be any team's number 1 where they didn't have an established starter.

    would you have felt comfortable with Stevie being targeted for that TD with 1 second left? He was our #1. he's currently a #3 on a good team.

    and where you are looking for a game changing WR, he is still a rookie. even your precious benjamin gets this benefit. what you expect from a rookie WR is to be decent. Eric moulds first two years had 275-300 yards in receptions each yearas he learned the system. He had 2 TDs. But i guess his career of having almost 10000 yards was meaningless because he didn't meet fletch's stat's only view on the world.

    watkins catches anything remotely close to him and about 50% of the things no one else would even touch.

    Find me another wr that reliable. if he stays at his pace, we know we have a #1 wr and can go address other things. if we had benjamin, we would still be wondering if we can make him better by having another #1a/b WR to pair him with.
    Great post trap, thanks!

    I disagree on Benjamin. I saw him play at FSU and have gone out of my way to watch him some at Carolina. He makes the catches too.

    I also still say that this notion that Watkins is the kind of WR that has to be accounted for, above and beyond the norm, is premature. We'll see as things progress. He's had two great games, one good game, and hasn't done much in four others. It's not like he's become a regular at doing this and I'd like to see it against some teams and Ds besides Chicago and Minnesota as well.

    Benjamin is 6'5" compared to Watkins 6'1" and 30 lbs. lighter. Benjamin is more that mold of those WRs that you say need to be accounted for and his collegiate accolades were nothing to laugh at and he posted better games against their tougher competition. It has nothing to do with "my precious Benjamin." If Benjamin were on our team you'd all be switching stances.

    But again, would it have been better to have had our 1st and 4th's next season and Benjamin, or Watkins?

    Time will tell but right now Benjamin's the better NFL WR both visually, in terms of consistency, as well as statistically. He's a huge RZ target, the kind that everyone said Williams was, but Benjamin's actually playing that way.
    http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/sho...s-haters/page3

    Post #46

    Quote Originally Posted by Yasgur's Farm View Post
    (Moderator) My name's Max Yasgur, and I approve of this post.
    Originally Posted by pmoon6
    The idea that you "won't settle" presumes that you have some kind of control. Delusional thinking at best for a supposed fan of a spectators' sport. Your way to deal with it is to constantly ***** and denigrate any move, any result concerning the team even if it's positive because you don't want your whittle feewings hurt again. It's a protection mechanism.

    You shroud your childish approach in a vale of pompous, intellectual garbage in an attempt to look smart and "real". You over-analyze even minute points and manipulate statistics to fit your negative view of the team. Again, to feel good about yourself and to protect from getting hurt.

    Of course, the criticisms are obviously from someone who has no understanding of the team concept or what it takes to excel at athletics.

    The true "realist" understands that they have no control of what happens on the field or behind the closed doors at One Bills' Drive, so they do the prudent thing for a spectator. They enjoy the games on Sunday with family and friends, cheer for their team and realize that it's just entertainment.
    ------

    "I was an integral part in the drafting process of EJ Manuel," Whaley said Thursday on NFL Network's Total Access. "I was the person that handled the draft process and setting up the board."

    "We are committed. I want you to believe me when I say that," Whaley said of building around the second-year quarterback, per The Buffalo News. "I always tell you guys that I'll never say never because I don't want to paint myself in a corner, but when I do say something, I do it and I mean it and I try to fulfill it."

    "We believe the addition of Sammy is going to be instant impact, not only to our quarterback, but to what our offensive coordinator can come up with game-plan wise and how defenses attack us," Whaley said.

    Whaley on EJ Manuel: "We think we got a gem in this guy." (2:30)

    "And as Mark says, if in three years maybe he's not [our quarterback of the future], then I'll be sitting there saying 'hey guys', .... anybody got a job for me?" - Doug Whaley


  4. #23
    Registered User casdhf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    20% Warning Level
    Posts
    17,542
    Thanks
    272
    Thanked 730 Times in 363 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    99

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    If we end up with a pick in the 20s, as currently projected, I would say the trade would be worth it. Watkins arguably took over the final drive against the Vikings and was a real difference maker vs the Dolphins. There are two wins that may not have happened with Stevie as our 1.
    Quote Originally Posted by BillsZone Mod
    cas,

    I'm just letting you know that you have been given 2 points for telling Wys AKA Mark to kill himself.

    BillsZone Mod


  5. #24
    Registered User casdhf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    20% Warning Level
    Posts
    17,542
    Thanks
    272
    Thanked 730 Times in 363 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    99

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Also, out of the 10 players on that list, two of them played ball at UB, and one is a current Bill.

    Go Buffalo

  6. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Quote Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
    Look at his collegiate game stats in detail and the types of teams that he put up his best games against k.

    What you'll note is that he didn't put up very many good games against top defensive teams and generally had a very low ypr in them too. I'm not sure that supports what you just said. Just throwing that out there. You may want to temper your optimism to avoid potential disappointment is all I'm saying.

    A few of his rookie peers, including Benjamin who leads the league for rookies right now and is on pace for well over 1,000 yards as a rookie, and who was on FSU, had much better games against better Ds in college. He also had much better bigger game experience.

    I'd love to have him instead and our two picks back.
    When you discuss receivers you never take the QB into consideration.

    Of course a receiver that plays with a GOOD QB is going to put up better numbers than a receiver playing with a mediocre QB.

    Watkins College QB was mediocre. And EJ & Kyle are mediocre as well.

    If Watkins had Peyton Manning or Aaron Rodgers as his QB, he would have set records already.

  7. Post thanked by:

    trapezeus (10-24-2014)

  8. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,166
    Thanks
    787
    Thanked 527 Times in 417 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Quote Originally Posted by better days View Post
    When you discuss receivers you never take the QB into consideration.
    Another lie.

  9. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Quote Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
    Another lie.
    Not a lie. Show me a post where you said the QB played an important role in a receivers numbers & I will apologize for being wrong.

  10. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    158
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    I can't believe you still compare Benjamin to Watkins. Watkins was our day one number 1. Watkins got revis treatment and it was obvious he was going to get the last ball against Carolina. That's special. It's actually unreal that a 21 yr has been able to carry that load, go compare him to other rookie starters, find me one who was thrown in as no. 1 with that much pressure from day 1 and produced.

    How you can admit that Benjamin has caught balls from Derek Anderson and continue to compare them is beyond me. I've watched all his games, most of his catches are garbage time. You're comparing a project who's caught garbage Tds to a no. 1 21 yr old who gets gameplanned against who has single handedly already won games for us. If anything BEnjamin hasn't transitioned well, he can't get an inch of separation.

    I know, or am hoping, you realize all this and are simply saying things in desperation to back up prior comments. Give it up.

  11. #29
    Registered User casdhf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    20% Warning Level
    Posts
    17,542
    Thanks
    272
    Thanked 730 Times in 363 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    99

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Talking about College stats is ******ed. Lets go back to High School huh? Danny Wuerffle should be in the hall of fame.

  12. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,131
    Thanks
    1,188
    Thanked 1,157 Times in 749 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    30

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    I really don't know where you are coming from Fletch. The kid dominated in college and while always getting special notice from opposing defense's.

    The last game I watched him in was when he almost single handidly beat the crap out of Ohio St. in their bowl.

  13. #31
    Legendary Zoner trapezeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    19,525
    Thanks
    4,356
    Thanked 3,218 Times in 1,859 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    i wasn't sold on the trade up at the time, but seeing how it's playing out, it is nice to have a bonafide star at a position than a work in process thatyou hope to god outperforms and plays at a higher level.

    i also think the watkins is playing injured as he has said and shown in his tapes an ability to thrive on contact. i believe that's largely the reason the bills have stayed away from his WR screens that he excells at. the other part is that hacket doesn't seem to have a plan. he just likes calling plays in.

  14. Post thanked by:

    better days (10-24-2014),Buffalogic (10-24-2014)

  15. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    5,599
    Thanks
    1,143
    Thanked 3,831 Times in 2,091 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    35

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Sometimes you have to Watch the games & get your head out of the stat sheet to understand what's going on on the field. That's why the ones watching the games know Watkins is special. If you don't, you're either not watching the games or just don't get it.
    If stats were so important, there wouldn't be film review. Meetings would consist of the coaches handing out stat sheets and everyone would go home 10 minutes after getting there. The NFL is a little more complicated than that. Some people who think the stats tell everything don't understand the NFL.

  16. Post thanked by:

    better days (10-24-2014),k-oneputt (10-24-2014),Novacane (10-24-2014),trapezeus (10-24-2014)

  17. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    5,599
    Thanks
    1,143
    Thanked 3,831 Times in 2,091 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    35

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    The real irony of the Benjamin vs Watkins argument is that the 2nd best receiver in the draft wasn't Benjamin, it was Odell Beckham Jr. Unfortunately, he missed the 1st few games of the season, so Stat Boys don't have him on their radar, because his games so far don't get him on the national stat sheets.
    If Stat Boy was making the case the Bills should have stayed where they were & drafted Beckham, he'd have a lot more credibility.

  18. Post thanked by:

    k-oneputt (10-24-2014),Novacane (10-24-2014)

  19. #34
    Registered User wolfpack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    153
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 88 Times in 41 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    16

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Quote Originally Posted by Albany,n.y. View Post
    The real irony of the Benjamin vs Watkins argument is that the 2nd best receiver in the draft wasn't Benjamin, it was Odell Beckham Jr. Unfortunately, he missed the 1st few games of the season, so Stat Boys don't have him on their radar, because his games so far don't get him on the national stat sheets.
    If Stat Boy was making the case the Bills should have stayed where they were & drafted Beckham, he'd have a lot more credibility.

  20. #35
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,862
    Thanks
    30,553
    Thanked 30,556 Times in 17,441 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Quote Originally Posted by Fletch View Post
    Great post trap, thanks!

    I disagree on Benjamin. I saw him play at FSU and have gone out of my way to watch him some at Carolina. He makes the catches too.

    I also still say that this notion that Watkins is the kind of WR that has to be accounted for, above and beyond the norm, is premature. We'll see as things progress. He's had two great games, one good game, and hasn't done much in four others. It's not like he's become a regular at doing this and I'd like to see it against some teams and Ds besides Chicago and Minnesota as well.

    Benjamin is 6'5" compared to Watkins 6'1" and 30 lbs. lighter. Benjamin is more that mold of those WRs that you say need to be accounted for and his collegiate accolades were nothing to laugh at and he posted better games against their tougher competition. It has nothing to do with "my precious Benjamin." If Benjamin were on our team you'd all be switching stances.

    But again, would it have been better to have had our 1st and 4th's next season and Benjamin, or Watkins?

    Time will tell but right now Benjamin's the better NFL WR both visually, in terms of consistency, as well as statistically. He's a huge RZ target, the kind that everyone said Williams was, but Benjamin's actually playing that way.
    Considering the Patriots decided to blanket Watkins with Revis for the entire game as part of their game plan, it certainly isn't premature.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

  21. Post thanked by:

    Novacane (10-24-2014)

  22. #36
    Registered User BuffaloRedleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,270
    Thanks
    968
    Thanked 1,208 Times in 606 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    I don't think anyone thought he wouldn't be good or great, but he'd need to be a Hall of Famer to be worth what we gave up or get us into the playoffs.

    If we draft Top 15 next year and can't use our pick everyone should be fired. You make the bed you sleep in it.

  23. Post thanked by:

    Fletch (10-27-2014)

  24. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    158
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Quote Originally Posted by BuffaloRedleg View Post
    I don't think anyone thought he wouldn't be good or great, but he'd need to be a Hall of Famer to be worth what we gave up or get us into the playoffs.

    If we draft Top 15 next year and can't use our pick everyone should be fired. You make the bed you sleep in it.
    Considering how bad our past 1st rounders have been, I'm ok with what we did. Rather have sammy than Kevlin Benjamin along with a MIke Williams/ cj spiller/ Ej manuel/ stephon Gilmore etc combo. These 1st rounders are wayyyyy overrated, hence why picking up an almost sure player is worth it.

  25. Post thanked by:

    Novacane (10-24-2014)

  26. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    158
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    All we've done is picked up meaningless mid 1st round players for two decades, sorry if I don't mind that for once we tried to hit a home run.

  27. Post thanked by:

    casdhf (10-24-2014),Novacane (10-24-2014),trapezeus (10-25-2014)

  28. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    158
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Go look at what we would've picked up instead. Browns took Justin Gilbert with what would have been our pick, he's currently behind an undrsfted guy and not playing. Go look at what Eric Ebron is doing. We would've picked a nonsense guy, along with another likely nonsense guy next yr.

  29. Post thanked by:

    casdhf (10-24-2014),Novacane (10-24-2014)

  30. #40
    Registered User Novacane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Dade City, FL
    Posts
    42,156
    Thanks
    13,220
    Thanked 12,391 Times in 7,274 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    129

    Re: Grantland says Sammy Watkins is pretty good

    Quote Originally Posted by Albany,n.y. View Post
    Sometimes you have to Watch the games & get your head out of the stat sheet to understand what's going on on the field. That's why the ones watching the games know Watkins is special. If you don't, you're either not watching the games or just don't get it.
    If stats were so important, there wouldn't be film review. Meetings would consist of the coaches handing out stat sheets and everyone would go home 10 minutes after getting there. The NFL is a little more complicated than that. Some people who think the stats tell everything don't understand the NFL.

    Or your name is fletch, you have an agenda and will never admit being wrong

  31. Post thanked by:

    trapezeus (10-25-2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •