If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
You don't have to believe my motivation, it's irrelevant to your incorrect points. If you didn't miss it, factual parts, irrelevant to my motivation, you should man up and admit you came up with a shallow analogy unable to stand up to fact and move along.
You're either right or wrong comparing Holcomb to Orton, and the same with the old Stevie Johnson/David Nelson are enabling thugs argument you also lost and couldn't bring yourself to admit you were wrong. Yes I still remember it.
The words are easy "I am wrong", try working through them by yourself. The world doesn't change any when you say them.
The posts, removing the side Johnson/Nelson factual discrepancy, Orton is Holcomb, yes or no ? Prove it. You can't, it's wrong. Just admit it, I know you can do this.
Sure, so long as all you need to do is get to the Quickie Mart and back. Herbie Holcomb wasn't going to win any races.
You may not, but you'll get closer to being in a position to win races in the future.
At least with the Beetle, the other teams see you're trying, you're a plucky underdog. With the Yugo they see you've succumbed to a homoerotic delusion fated to destroy the team's chances for years..
And if you can't see the benefit of your peers taking you seriously, well,....
You don't have to believe my motivation, it's irrelevant to your incorrect points.
It's certainly relevant to whether you consider my points correct or incorrect.
Why should I make an effort to educate someone who's only looking for something to fight about? I've been though this before many times with the Losmaniacs and it's a pointless exercise other than it shows non-Losmaniacs the horrific effects of falling in love with the wrong guy and being a douche when it's pointed out.
I know I'm never to be believed for some strange reason, but I'd like to thank all you guys for playing a HUGE role in putting together those Bills teams of the late '80s and early '90s. Almost forgot to thank you for that.
If Butler would have listened to me, he could have hung on to Wolford, but he was a little bit chicken-**** to test the system that was screwing him.
YardRat Wall of Fame #56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
You may not, but you'll get closer to being in a position to win races in the future.
At least with the Beetle, the other teams see you're trying, you're a plucky underdog. With the Yugo they see you've succumbed to a homoerotic delusion fated to destroy the team's chances for years..
And if you can't see the benefit of your peers taking you seriously, well,....
Wait...just so we're clear. Holcomb is the Beetle, right? Having Holcomb showed other teams that the Bills were "a plucky underdog"?
LOL...do you really think other teams even game planned for Holcomb? He was a nobody-never-was with a ticket on the train to Palookaville waiting at the station, paid in full.
It's certainly relevant to whether you consider my points correct or incorrect.
Why should I make an effort to educate someone who's only looking for something to fight about? I've been though this before many times with the Losmaniacs and it's a pointless exercise other than it shows non-Losmaniacs the horrific effects of falling in love with the wrong guy and being a douche when it's pointed out.
I'm not looking for anything to fight about, in fact I took a few days off because I don't want to fight about anything I worry I might want to fight about and never stay long in the political forums. I say what I want to and move along if people don't like it. People can agree or not when I argue intangible things with a passion if I said what I wanted to. Free speech. I'm good with it.
If I have tangible though, I pursue a point.
You are not a stupid person. I presented you with facts as you purport to present. I expect you to debate them intelligently. If you can't, I expect you to admit it, as I would and have in numerous threads where I have ridiculed myself. It's not my fault if you aren't paying attention, I am not thinking myself a board superstar and never wrong.
So again I mention, and you are you so oddly married to your point you cannot answer it, your post #25, you were wrong and getting wronger, deal with it and man up ? You compared Holcomb to Orton, it was wrong, you went on to justify your wrong which is like everything you proclaim to hate. You tried to bicker with me about Johnson/Nelson, where you were wrong too, but failed to even try and keep justifying it which is everything you proclaim to hate.
You're being pretty much everything you proclaim to hate, and why should I not see you as a hypocritical fool who lips off a lot loudly ? Why shouldn't anyone, just because you can't properly answer your own point ?
So again, and it has nothing to do with Losman, are you seriously comparing Holcomb to Orton ?
Comment