Careful.Originally Posted by Swiper
He doesn't want to fight. He wants to call people liars before patronizing them in ridiculous ways...but he doesn't want to fight. He wants to educate. LOL.
The QB situation ten years ago matters not, anyway.
Careful.
He doesn't want to fight. He wants to call people liars before patronizing them in ridiculous ways...but he doesn't want to fight. He wants to educate. LOL.
The QB situation ten years ago matters not, anyway.
Of course. That's because you are so smart.
Only football isn't your forte.And Orton isn't better than Holcomb, he IS Holcomb.
Lehner's history. He just doesn't know it yet.
feldspar (11-06-2014),WagonCircler (11-06-2014)
Dude, Johnsonite is not the preferred nomenclature. RobKnob, please.
feldspar (11-06-2014),IlluminatusUIUC (11-07-2014),justasportsfan (11-06-2014)
Nope.
I was flabbergasted when Flutie was replaced by Robbo for the Titans game - what happened after that was inevitable...
My tebya razdavim
1. Yes, I am smart. People without self-esteem issues recogni2e that.
2. A "forte" is a value judgment, therefore even IF football isn't my forte, it still doesn't mean I'm not a smarter football analyst than any of you. It just means I'm even better at something else, as hard as that is to comprehend...
Probably when you stop running away from being wrong.
Actually, the Beetle is a damn nice car.
YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
shiva confuses intelligence with narcissism once again. It's his modus operandi.
Have a salad.
I should just relax and embrace dumbassery?
No thanks. I'll leave that to you.
Some people are lucky enough to have nall sorts of things to be narcissistic about.shiva confuses intelligence with narcissism once again. It's his modus operandi.
Have a salad.
Yeah, you've not nall sorts of things to be narcissistic about alright.
Nall:
verb of "llan" which means to "laugh like a nerd" (Nall is backwords of llan)
Mark nalled all night long at Rin's nose.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...&defid=3926408
Last edited by feldspar; 11-07-2014 at 08:03 AM.
Losman was better than Nall.
There wasn't really any reason to even say that besides desperation. I offered you stats and proofs and asked you for yours. How is that being "dumbassery". It isn't. Get a grip.
This isn't the bottom of the barrel - it's beneath the bottom of the barrel.
Don't quit your day job...
Your dumbass opinion.
People with a brain could think of some others...
That's all you deserve, asswipe.
This isn't the bottom of the barrel - it's beneath the bottom of the barrel.
It's stats. What's your issue ? I am not insulting you. Why are you going to insults ? You're falling into the same preconceived pat answers you once accused me of. Am I upsetting you ? I'm sorry. How does that happen ?
So anyway...defend your argument or admit it is wrong. You don't have to insult me, I am amused and not angry. You are amusing me. Throw me some facts or stats ? Or insult me some more ?
I deserve to watch you behave like a loudmouth moron?
Thanks for the thought, but you really don't have to act like a jackass on my account.
It's not like none of us know what you're really like already.
Save your energy for someone you have a chance of laying a finger on.
It's insulting when you pretend to want a discussion but actually are just looking for something to argue with.
I\ve been through the stats argument at least a half do2en times and it's pointless repeating it to a Losmaniac looking for a fight.
but here, I'll give you a stat.
Before the Jets game, the last game of the year, Holcomb was top ten in passer rating. His rating only fell after the Jets game, a meaningless contest where he threw 4 picks, none of which were his fault.
In fact, Holcomb showed his willingness to take one for the team when the last pass he threw was a hail mary, where he sacrificed his own stats to try to win a meaningless game..
At that point, he was 4 - 3 as a starter. All that with a team in turmoil and coaches that wanted to get fired.
Okay, I look forward to you telling me the stats are meaningless.
Amuse me.
It's insulting when people are unable to discuss what they pretend to.
Kelly Holcomb : http://www.pro-football-reference.co...H/HolcKe00.htm
Kyle Orton : http://www.pro-football-reference.co...O/OrtoKy00.htm
Has nothing to do with your Losman obsession. The stats are not meaningless, they they are for you in full glory. Orton and Holcomb are comparable in only the narrowest, least significant sense. Holcomb (at 32) was total 5 year record of 13 games started, a 4-9 record, 27 td's to 29 int's, and 3892 total yards passing, where Orton (at 31) has an 8 year record of 70 games started , 35-35 record, 83 td's to 59 int's, and 15,019 yards.
They aren't comparable except you knee jerked and thought they might be. Try again ?
swiper (11-08-2014),WagonCircler (11-08-2014)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
