• Trading next year’s No. 1 draft pick for Sammy Watkins was a reckless move by Bills general manager Doug Whaley, a desperate attempt to prop up a shaky franchise quarterback and win games in a hurry to impress the next owner.
It was a bad idea on a number of levels. Whaley said the pick would be low in the first round, essentially guaranteeing his team would make the playoffs. Now the Bills are fading fast. If they don’t snap out of it, the first-round pick that Whaley gave the Browns might be in the top 10.
Do you know what makes Whaley’s Folly even worse? The NFL’s current crop of first-year wideouts is one of the best in history. This rookie class continues to validate the judgment of scouts who said last year’s draft would produce a bounty of gifted receivers.
In a draft filled with top wideouts, the Bills felt Watkins was a cut above the rest, a generational talent they simply had to have. So what if a bunch of other guys had rare ability and upside? They traded up for Watkins at No. 4 overall, forfeiting a chance to take a quarterback high in 2015.
This isn’t about Watkins’ talent. He’s a special player. For the most part, he has justified expectations. He might prove to be the best receiver in the 2014 draft. The issue is whether Watkins was so clearly superior to the rest of a great receiving class that it warranted the cost. When you see how the other rookies are doing, you have to wonder.
More...
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/tr...folly-20141117