I'm not only referencing TDs. I'm referencing his inability to catch 3 - 5 balls a game and keep drives alive. All too often he drops a catchable ball or has a bad penalty. To me he's a good number 2 TE but just not doing what he needs to do to be a starter in this league.
Last edited by The Jokeman; 12-21-2014 at 08:25 AM.
Orton can be a "Andy Dalton/Alex Smith/Russell Wilson type"?!?!? I think you are dreaming.
Orton makes costly turnovers and bad decisions. His worst attribute is his almost total immobility, which is completely opposite of "Andy Dalton/Alex Smith/Russell Wilson type".
This thread is about QB's that we can trade for this off season. Andy Dalton/Alex Smith/Russell Wilson are not going to be possible to trade for.
I don't like Cutler that much. But, he would be a substantial upgrade from Orton. Well...there are MANY upgrades above Orton. With some work and experience, I suspect that Ej Manuel would be a substantial upgrade from Orton.
The Total QBR is designed to take into account each individual play and access the degree that the QB contributed to making that play good, or bad.
Stanton would be a MAJOR upgrade from Orton. I think you are very, very wrong.
Come on man stop dreaming on Gray. I like him as a 3rd guy but a top two guy is asking a lot It's far fetched thinking like that's holding this team back. Sign a guy who's showed he can be better than Lee Smith at least. To me that's Jordan Cameron, Julius Thomas or Jermaine Gresham. Heck I'd take Charles Clay from Miami over pinning hopes on Gray.
I really don't like the receiving options on this team outside of Watkins and Woods. I guess I could stomach Chandler as a #2 TE. Outside of that there isn't anyone on the roster I love. I could debate that KC and the Bengals have better passing options than the Bills. The Seahawks maybe not but the Deahawks D and running offense is better than what the Bengals/Chiefs have which helps Wilson out. I honestly don't think Stanton is better than Orton if 'm going to rank the QBs I just mentioned they'd be Wilson/Dalton/Smith/Orton/Stanton. Yet with better receiving options I think Orton might be as good as Dalton. In a perfect world yes, I'd like to get someone better than Orton but based on who's likely going to be out there in 2015 I don't see a better QB.
Last edited by The Jokeman; 12-21-2014 at 08:51 AM.
Cameron and Thomas are not available and how is Gresham notably better than Chandler?
I would very much like to see someone argue that Kansas City has better receiving options then Buffalo.
Anyway Chandler is not the problem. He's not the solution, either, but he's not the problem. If you look at the good teams, they have stud players they build around but they still have a lot of average plug and play guys too.That's what Chandler is. If you ask him to be a Gronk-type #1 option, he will fail, but as the #3/#4 target he is fine.
If Eifert wasn't lost for the season a couple of plays into their first game, WR Marvin Jones never made it out of camp, and backup te Smith didn't go out for the season early on, CIN would have traded Gresham away. He blows hot and cold, constantly claims injury, and shows hands of iron at inopportune moments..see CIN vs. HOU playoff games.
Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.