Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Collapse
X
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Originally posted by better days View PostI'm pretty sure it was made illegal sometime in the mid 70's.
How do you test for it?My tebya razdavim
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Originally posted by Swiper View Post
I was expecting to see a funny joke when I opened the link.
Comment
-
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Originally posted by better days View PostA little disappointed.
I was expecting to see a funny joke when I opened the link.
Notice I'm not angry swiper right now?
Comment
-
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Originally posted by Swiper View Post
40 years too late to save me...My tebya razdavim
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
If Marrone stays, Hacket stays. No decent OC is going to come here as a lame duck.
If Schwartz gets the top job we become the best OC job available. A top defense that will return mostly intact. And a HC that comes from the defensive side of the ball meaning that the OC gets all the credit for a turnaround.
And the task isn't even hard, just make them mediocre and you're a hero.
-
👍 5
Comment
-
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Originally posted by Mahdi View PostThis is what you believe should happen or what you think will happen?
Morris is the last guy to go IMO. Marrone and Hackett shat the bed more than he did. Even Whaley has a heavy hand in the destruction of the offense.
Let's examine our defense.. who chose our best players...
KW, MW, Dareus, trade for Hughes, Bradham, Gilmore, McKelvin, Aaron Williams, Searcy, --> none of those were chosen by the Marrone/Whaley combo... Kiko, Brown were only two guys drafted by our current guys
Our D has been led entirely by two very good DC.
On the other hand our O has gone from bad to worse under Marrone, personnel has gotten worse and play calling has been shocking at best. So wondering how this current regime has brought any improvement? Our D that another GM built is the reason we have 8 wins. Our O which is supposed to be the area of expertise of our HC has been a disaster.
As an example --> Rex Ryan always has good defenses and since Payton has been in NO from day one he had a good offense. For those guys it makes sense to keep them and improve the other side of the ball.COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.LecterWe were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Comment
-
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Originally posted by Spartacus View PostBet you never drove on acid, huh?
however lol in my younger experimental years not that im old now :) i drove on PCP (angel dust ) once, travolta in pulp fiction dont have nothing on me lol
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Originally posted by Swiper View PostI am eating dinner and opened a bottle of red wine tonight. Have to be VERY careful posting while drinking.
Notice I'm not angry swiper right now?
Comment
-
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Originally posted by jimmifli View PostIf Marrone stays, Hacket stays. No decent OC is going to come here as a lame duck.
If Schwartz gets the top job we become the best OC job available. A top defense that will return mostly intact. And a HC that comes from the defensive side of the ball meaning that the OC gets all the credit for a turnaround.
And the task isn't even hard, just make them mediocre and you're a hero.
So there's a ton of upside to it.
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Does Marrone Deserve to Stay
Originally posted by cookie G View PostTheir limitations were recognised and covered by previous coaching staff and their previous QB. They didn't give up many sacks because they had a QB who rarely held the ball for more than 2 seconds.
They had a play caller who was far better at keeping a team off balance in the run game, who knew what misdirection meant, and knew how to set up a D.
As far as something not adding up...who was it that made some of these decisions on how to use people? Was it Morris or Marrone?
For instance, the move of Pears to guard.
He's not a guard, never was, never will be. He's a guy that would get bowled back by smaller DE's when he played tackle, but had one thing going for him...he could at least get in someone's way long enough for Fitz to get rid of the ball. But having the power to hold off bigger DL's is not, and never was an area of strength with him.
And yet, he was moved to guard.
Who made the call?
Doug Marrone came away from Erik Pears' first game at right guard pleased, and seems set on his starting offensive line heading into Week 1.
That really sounds like Marrone making the call. I could be wrong..I'm not in the meetings...but I have a hard time believing he'd let his OL coach overrule him in a decision like that. And he also doesn't sound like he's covering for someone else's decision.
Morris has a long track record of producing lines with a very good running game, even if you ignore the Adrian Peterson years in Minny.
Hackett...well...he has no track record...and has shown some inexcusable deficiencies in calling a running game.
You want to make Morris the scapegoat fine...
but this offense doesn't get better if the people running it are left intact.
Never had an OL that allowed less than 30 sacks in a year, best running games came with backs that were top 5 in the NFL (Gore and Peterson).
Which part of this is supposed to be the impressive part again?
This offense isn't getting better until they learn how to block the person in front of them. We'll work on blocking blitzers, stunts, and twists next year. Clearly its baby steps with this OL scheme.COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.LecterWe were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Comment
-
Comment