Their limitations were recognised and covered by previous coaching staff and their previous QB. They didn't give up many sacks because they had a QB who rarely held the ball for more than 2 seconds.
They had a play caller who was far better at keeping a team off balance in the run game, who knew what misdirection meant, and knew how to set up a D.
As far as something not adding up...who was it that made some of these decisions on how to use people? Was it Morris or Marrone?
For instance, the move of Pears to guard.
He's not a guard, never was, never will be. He's a guy that would get bowled back by smaller DE's when he played tackle, but had one thing going for him...he could at least get in someone's way long enough for Fitz to get rid of the ball. But having the power to hold off bigger DL's is not, and never was an area of strength with him.
And yet, he was moved to guard.
Who made the call?
http://www.buffalorumblings.com/bill...at-right-guard
That really sounds like Marrone making the call. I could be wrong..I'm not in the meetings...but I have a hard time believing he'd let his OL coach overrule him in a decision like that. And he also doesn't sound like he's covering for someone else's decision.
Morris has a long track record of producing lines with a very good running game, even if you ignore the Adrian Peterson years in Minny.
Hackett...well...he has no track record...and has shown some inexcusable deficiencies in calling a running game.
You want to make Morris the scapegoat fine...
but this offense doesn't get better if the people running it are left intact.