The logical route is to conclude that the Sabres have intentionally decided to lose games for at least a 2 year period.Originally Posted by JATMtheJATM
Some how a GM that has not proven he can succeed as a NHL GM is being given credit for a strategy where his team intentionally loses and he trades players away to make his team worse.
If you can't see how that is wrong and all you can come up with is that other teams have done it in the past, I'm not sure you ever will.
Trading away players that weren't going to stay because they had expiring contracts? That's your argument?
Do you even pay attention to hockey?
Sure do.
Attempting to resign them was simply impossible eh?
Tons of salary cap space. Billionaire owner.
Murray had no choice.
And what if you know you aren't ever going to win with them if you sink a pile of what are limited assets into them in order to keep them....
...or get a future asset for them in an attempt to build a new franchise in a different vision?
just stop.
ever heard of the definition of insanity?
vanek was not coming back. miller was not coming back.
trade them for assets. because, you know, thats how things work in the NHL. not the sabres. league wide.
like coastal said. just stop. you are making an ass of yourself.
This is for SPIKE.... The Sabres tanking. Why does this bother you So Much?....You start threads like this one???...........Just laugh at the sabres and move on!.....I have to say, its been a tough year for me, to watch the sabres, but im all in on this tanking!!......My take.....you hate that we (sabres) will become a great team in the future.
Last edited by yanklovver; 01-24-2015 at 09:38 PM.
no comment
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote