If the Pats aren't guilty...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spartacus
    Registered User
    • Mar 2003
    • 54101

    #46
    Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

    Originally posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
    You sound French.
    Vous ĂȘtes vraiment un homme avec de la merde pour les cerveaux...
    My tebya razdavim

    Comment

    • Joe Fo Sho
      Making Spirits Bright
      • Mar 2006
      • 6194

      #47
      Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

      Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
      Vous ĂȘtes vraiment un homme avec de la merde pour les cerveaux...
      I can use google translate too. I'll let you keep with the name calling though, shows you're running out of options.

      Comment

      • Spartacus
        Registered User
        • Mar 2003
        • 54101

        #48
        Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

        Originally posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
        I can use google translate too. I'll let you keep with the name calling though, shows you're running out of options.
        Google translate? Am I not French? But you said so. Were you really calling me un nom? Mais non!
        My tebya razdavim

        Comment

        • Joe Fo Sho
          Making Spirits Bright
          • Mar 2006
          • 6194

          #49
          Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

          Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
          Google translate? Am I not French? But you said so. Were you really calling me un nom? Mais non!
          Having trouble reading? I never said you were French, I said you sound French.

          Kinda like how you're probably not a complete moron in person, you just sound like it on this message board.

          Comment

          • Spartacus
            Registered User
            • Mar 2003
            • 54101

            #50
            Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

            Originally posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
            I never said you were French, I said you sound French.
            Q'est-ce que la difference, mon petite tete de patate?
            My tebya razdavim

            Comment

            • Joe Fo Sho
              Making Spirits Bright
              • Mar 2006
              • 6194

              #51
              Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

              Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
              Q'est-ce que la difference, mon petite tete de patate?
              Explain this and I'll tell ya.

              Comment

              • Spartacus
                Registered User
                • Mar 2003
                • 54101

                #52
                Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

                Originally posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
                Explain this and I'll tell ya.
                From the article...

                "While these data do not prove the Patriots deflated footballs starting in 2007..."


                So, I have to explain what the author plainly says? Why?
                My tebya razdavim

                Comment

                • Joe Fo Sho
                  Making Spirits Bright
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 6194

                  #53
                  Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

                  Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
                  From the article...

                  "While these data do not prove the Patriots deflated footballs starting in 2007..."


                  So, I have to explain what the author plainly says? Why?
                  I asked you to explain the anomaly. I didn't say prove they didn't cheat.

                  Comment

                  • Spartacus
                    Registered User
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 54101

                    #54
                    Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

                    Originally posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
                    I asked you to explain the anomaly. I didn't say prove they didn't cheat.
                    They did an extra good job. Someone has to be the best. Do you know what the odds against a hole in one are? And yet people make them.

                    The vast majority of fumbles I see occur would have been fumbles whether the ball was 12.5 or 2.5.
                    My tebya razdavim

                    Comment

                    • Meathead
                      Insufferable ***** and perpetual crybaby
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 21349

                      #55
                      Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

                      damn right they did. a once every sixteen hundred years extra good job. what was i thinking accusing them of cheating
                      One set of rules for all in the beloved community

                      Comment

                      • gebobs
                        One Bills Drive, Georgia - 871 miles south of Orchard Park
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 11520

                        #56
                        Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

                        What's it going to be next year. The Pats will get caught filling the balls with argon and laser cooling them from the blimp?
                        Lehner's history. He just doesn't know it yet.

                        Comment

                        • Joe Fo Sho
                          Making Spirits Bright
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 6194

                          #57
                          Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

                          Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
                          They did an extra good job. Someone has to be the best. Do you know what the odds against a hole in one are? And yet people make them.

                          The vast majority of fumbles I see occur would have been fumbles whether the ball was 12.5 or 2.5.
                          This answer is why no one is going to respect your opinion.

                          This data is showing that the likelihood of something like this happening is one in over 5,000.

                          Maybe you don't understand what this means, so I'll put it into your golf analogy. He's not saying the likelihood of a hole in one is 1 in 5,000. He's saying that the likelihood of someone having this many hole in ones more than the field is a statistically anomaly that is incredibly unlikely to happen. This is saying that one person, over an 8 year span, has got more hole in ones than anybody else, and it's not even close. This guy is averaging 5 hole in ones per year, where the best golfers in the world have 3 on their entire resume.

                          Do you need me to explain it further or are you sticking with "Belichick says no fumble so his players no fumble" argument.

                          Comment

                          • gebobs
                            One Bills Drive, Georgia - 871 miles south of Orchard Park
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 11520

                            #58
                            Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

                            Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
                            They did an extra good job. Someone has to be the best. Do you know what the odds against a hole in one are? And yet people make them.
                            That's right, they are rare. But one player doesn't nail twice as many aces as the rest of the field over a period of eight seasons.
                            Last edited by gebobs; 01-27-2015, 02:02 PM.
                            Lehner's history. He just doesn't know it yet.

                            Comment

                            • Spartacus
                              Registered User
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 54101

                              #59
                              Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

                              Originally posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
                              This answer is why no one is going to respect your opinion.
                              I've invariably found that guys who purport to speak for everyone are full of crap.

                              You worry about people respecting you first...
                              My tebya razdavim

                              Comment

                              • Spartacus
                                Registered User
                                • Mar 2003
                                • 54101

                                #60
                                Re: If the Pats aren't guilty...

                                Originally posted by gebobs View Post
                                That's right, they are rare. But one player doesn't nail twice as many aces as the rest of the field over a period of eight seasons.
                                Some pros have made 50 or 60, some have never made one....
                                My tebya razdavim

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X