CommissarSpartacus (01-30-2015)
The biggest ass clown the NFL has is ......... wait for it ..........
ROBERT KRAFT!!
28**60**128**133**144**160**163**200**204**248
Dont even know where to start. So ill start from the beginning.
The tapes that were destroyed were of the coaches signals. That was in sept of 07.
On the Friday before the superbowl. The Boston Herald ran a story wtitten by John Tomasse that there were tapes of the Rams walk through prior to SB36 and that Matt Walsh had them.
In May of 08 the NFL interviewed walsh an he provided tapes of coaches signals which was what the nfl already knew. Walsh admitted that he never taped a walkthrough and the Herald retracted the story and apologized.
CommissarSpartacus (01-30-2015)
Yeah, too bad it's on record that Belichick admitted to Goodell that he'd been taping ever since he arrived in New England.
YardRat Wall of Fame
#56 DARRYL TALLEY #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
http://www.si.com/nfl/2014/09/17/rog...-arlen-specter
I guess the press is making it all up.
ROFL @ you. You read that article? There are MULTIPLE citings of taping by various organizations.
One of several:
What part of that, exactly, did the media "make up?"On Nov. 19, 2006, Doug Collins, the Green Bay Packers’ security chief removed Patriots film guy Matt Estrella after Estrella was caught taping the Packers’ defensive signals.
"I've got no rules to hold me down / to make me fret, or make me frown / I had rules, but now I'mfree / There are no rules for me! "
CommissarSpartacus (01-30-2015)
Actually Goodell/the NFL released a statement characterizing THEIR interpretation of what was said. He said he had no tape to turn over. Seems pretty clear, with the sheer number of attorneys involved, that Walsh was threatened with legal action, and he ultimately was able to get immunity from prosecution, based on what he DID turn over. You can be there would be NO immunity had he turned over a tape of the walk-through! Not sure if the issue is that the Patriots owned the tapes or equipment. Also the Patriots flatly denied that "The Patriots" taped a walk-through. Well of course if someone is doing this ON THEIR OWN (kinda like a Deflating Equipment Manager) then it wouldn't be "The Patriots" doing it.
Patti
Note: Discotrish information is Conspiralicious and has NO BASIS IN FACT. Considering her opinions may be HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH. Please do not get your medical advice from a subforum of a subforum of a sports message board.
NFL executive confirms Colts' general manager tipped off DeflateGate
http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/2/3...gland-patriots
It's rather amusing that the only ball that was found to be significantly underinflated was the one that D'Qwell Jackson intercepted and the Colts handled before turning it over. Things that make you go hmmmm...
But facts be damned and let ESPNTMZ and others allow a rush to judgement to cloud peoples perception in order to tell a fabricated story for ratings and page clicks.
You do know that Marty Schoettenheimer was taping signals when he was in KC and who knows if anyone from his coaching tree followed suit, like Herm Edwards, Tony Dungy and Bill Cowher. Marty admitted to taping signals.
Also, EPSN taped a portion of a Bills practice prior to the Superbowl and it aired on TV, it showed a play in specific which was designed to attack a weakness in the Cowboys D that Jimmy Johnson was able to see and thus adjust for.
The media and league decided to rush to judgement on the Pats, because lets face it, the league likes parity and wants to see new teams be able to rise not have the same team be dominant for a decade plus...the fans ate it up because just like the league other teams fans get sick of seeing the same team win year in and year out...and then when all the facts come out the story fizzles out. All that's left is Matt Walsh was taping practices; he wasn't...and that gave the Pats a distinct advantage and allowed for them to win the Superbowl against the Rams. Then again when you have Marshall Faulk banging that "the only reason we could have possibly lost to the Pats is because they cheated," it's hard to believe anything else.
Truth be told, the only rule they may have actually violated is where they were taping the opposition's sidelines and signals from.
But that wouldn't be as fun of a story for the media to report right? I mean after all ESPN needs ratings and page clicks.
CommissarSpartacus (02-03-2015)
The amusing thing is that the "it was only one ball" leak came out after Bob Kraft whined about the treatment his boys were getting in the media.
Uh huh. Its amusing that people will actually believe the updated story.
I doubt anyone in Pats land anticipated the reaction they received, both from the media and former players/coaches.
They had to do something..so Kraft strong arms the commissioner he owns to create the whitewash story.
Shocking...lol.
One born every minute.