If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
If the offense can be average and Rex can get the D to play near last year's level, we're a playoff team and a road win in Boston away from winning the division.
the goal here is to have the run game we had in 2013 with the pass game we had in 2014, it's not that ambitious, but it's realistic and combined with a killer d and special teams it is a blue print for a dominant team (SF, old ravens, Seattle) if it works.
the goal here is to have the run game we had in 2013 with the pass game we had in 2014, it's not that ambitious, but it's realistic and combined with a killer d and special teams it is a blue print for a dominant team (SF, old ravens, Seattle) if it works.
This might be the first smart move we have seen to upgrade the QB position and not 'fix' it in years. Cassel can play in the right situation. So we gave up a draft position for some movement at the QB position. Maybe we can get another FA QB maybe we can't that remains to be seen ... but we could get Cassel today and the pulled the trigger. Even if they end up cutting him it was worth the trade to improve the position. In our best case scenario we are cutting him and people are *****ing about the waste when TODAY this is a solid move to improve the team. We could end up cutting EJ too if he doesn't show in camp he's useless at this point and needs a new situation. I would love to get another guy and have all three lighting it up in camp and have that kind of problem. This is a 'let's build some security' move.
Tweet
Comment