Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Why are our Safeties backwards?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Is it just me or shouldnt Aaron, who has good coverage skills, be the FS. While the Dukes/ last year Searcy play SS. Ive always thought that your hard hitter, in the box safety, plays SS, and your playmaker is your FS. There is no denying A-Will can hit, but hes also a playmaker.
    Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions

  2. #2
    Buffalo Bills Fan
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    15,084
    Thanks
    685
    Thanked 3,092 Times in 2,341 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    52

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cali512 View Post
    Is it just me or shouldnt Aaron, who has good coverage skills, be the FS. While the Dukes/ last year Searcy play SS. Ive always thought that your hard hitter, in the box safety, plays SS, and your playmaker is your FS. There is no denying A-Will can hit, but hes also a playmaker.
    I think that the rules favoring the pass has killed the SS position. Teams routinely show 4 wr sets, defenses routinely show nickel and dime sets.
    Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.

  3. Post thanked by:

    jimmifli (04-06-2015)

  4. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 1,948 Times in 1,276 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    27

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Even in base its like this though

  5. #4
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    86,101
    Thanks
    30,690
    Thanked 30,656 Times in 17,508 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    244

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Safeties have become interchangeable with their responsibilities on any given play determined by their reads of the offense, so it really isn't a factor for most teams.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

  6. Post thanked by:

    Topas (04-05-2015)

  7. #5
    Haha...yeah you think so ? Mace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    20,313
    Thanks
    25,343
    Thanked 16,509 Times in 9,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    I think you're going to see Ryan expect both to be coverage and hard hitters and swap them liberally so offenses will not know anyway. In his best case, the coverage guy ends up covering and the hitter hitting. In worst case it gives up 15 yards a pop which will be less often than you'd think.

  8. #6
    Do you read what you write? Oaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Grand Rapids
    Posts
    6,150
    Thanks
    1,235
    Thanked 908 Times in 552 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    What I don't understand is why S isn't being talked about more as a 2nd/3rd rd pick for us. Duke ought be challenged.

  9. #7
    Haha...yeah you think so ? Mace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    20,313
    Thanks
    25,343
    Thanked 16,509 Times in 9,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oaf View Post
    What I don't understand is why S isn't being talked about more as a 2nd/3rd rd pick for us. Duke ought be challenged.
    I'll bet he will be with a second or third pick despite what people are talking about.

  10. #8
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    86,101
    Thanks
    30,690
    Thanked 30,656 Times in 17,508 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    244

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Everybody but Collins will probably still be on the board at 50, but I think the CW mindset of needing a lineman or QB has most leaning in that direction. Some have suggested that Ryan may want to go the DB route.

  11. #9
    June and Summertime! Frenchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    359
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 56 Times in 47 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Maybe people do go something like the DB route. In order to go into the NFL. But really need a S.
    ​Ready for Summertime Fun!

  12. #10
    Do you read what you write? Oaf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Grand Rapids
    Posts
    6,150
    Thanks
    1,235
    Thanked 908 Times in 552 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    31

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mace View Post
    I'll bet he will be with a second or third pick despite what people are talking about.
    I would have no problem with that.

  13. Post thanked by:

    Mace (04-05-2015)

  14. #11
    Registered User BertSquirtgum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The North Woods
    Posts
    13,379
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 3,399 Times in 2,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    2nd rd should be a center/guard. 3rd round should be qb. 4th should be a safety. Then BPA

  15. Post thanked by:

    sudzy (04-05-2015)

  16. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,802
    Thanks
    1,988
    Thanked 1,889 Times in 1,080 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Quote Originally Posted by BertSquirtgum View Post
    2nd rd should be a center/guard. 3rd round should be qb. 4th should be a safety. Then BPA
    No 4th so it would have to be a 5th. But, the way I have the needs ranked are: QB, OL. S

  17. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sparing my telomeres
    Posts
    33,105
    Thanks
    15,700
    Thanked 13,409 Times in 9,123 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Whaley sold off this draft.

    Boring.

  18. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    482
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 258 Times in 158 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Safety is in play, but there's already some depth with Graham being able to play S and Rambo will be back after a productive stint late I the year.

    Plus Meeks will be back for TV reps before he assumes his spot on the IR.

  19. Post thanked by:

    jimmifli (04-06-2015)

  20. #15
    Registered User BertSquirtgum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The North Woods
    Posts
    13,379
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 3,399 Times in 2,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Quote Originally Posted by sudzy View Post
    No 4th so it would have to be a 5th. But, the way I have the needs ranked are: QB, OL. S
    Gross. This draft is going to suck.

  21. #16
    Registered User jimmifli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    7,827
    Thanks
    10,020
    Thanked 8,924 Times in 4,182 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    39

    Re: Why are our Safeties backwards?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oaf View Post
    What I don't understand is why S isn't being talked about more as a 2nd/3rd rd pick for us. Duke ought be challenged.
    Graham can play safety in a pinch and Robey was awesome as the NB under Pettine, so we've already got a good plan b.

    Some positions don't have a plan a yet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •