Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42

Thread: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

  1. #21
    Registered User The Jokeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    9,995
    Thanks
    138
    Thanked 2,055 Times in 1,428 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by CoolBreeze View Post
    He's already the #2 TE on the roster.
    I think Gray might put up a fight but either way I'd feel better if we sign Gresham as an UFA after May 12 to give us a proven blocking TE.

  2. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Pink View Post
    He'll get like 10 catches because he'll hardly ever be on the field. If Clay needs a play off he'll see the field. I don't see the Bills running a 2 tight end set formation often, especially when neither of the two are very good at blocking.

    Is he a good player? Sure. Is he a good fit? Absolutely not.
    Roman said he wants to have FOUR TE's on the field at times.

  3. #23
    Moderator Yasgur's Farm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,091
    Thanks
    1,240
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 621 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by CoolBreeze View Post
    Looks to me like a few other posters should take a look at this video... Never seen Chandler do that!

  4. #24
    SpikedLemonade
    Guest

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by better days View Post
    Roman said he wants to have FOUR TE's on the field at times.
    And you believe him?

    He is talking out of his ass to get other DCs to waste time preparing for nonsense.

    4 TEs mean that with a QB and the 5 OLs that you either have one RB or one WR.

    Why would a team that has so much money/high draft picks invested in RBs and WRs only play just one of them on any one play?

  5. #25
    Making Spirits Bright Joe Fo Sho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,193
    Thanks
    1,272
    Thanked 3,595 Times in 1,857 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    34

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by SpikedLemonade View Post
    And you believe him?

    He is talking out of his ass to get other DCs to waste time preparing for nonsense.

    4 TEs mean that with a QB and the 5 OLs that you either have one RB or one WR.

    Why would a team that has so much money/high draft picks invested in RBs and WRs only play just one of them on any one play?
    Can you really not think of a single reason?

  6. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    287
    Thanks
    93
    Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by SpikedLemonade View Post
    And you believe him?

    He is talking out of his ass to get other DCs to waste time preparing for nonsense.

    4 TEs mean that with a QB and the 5 OLs that you either have one RB or one WR.

    Why would a team that has so much money/high draft picks invested in RBs and WRs only play just one of them on any one play?
    other dc are no preparing for the bills 4 tes lol... other dc will look at cassels tape, romans philosophy. he said that because its something he does. everything isnt some cia hide the ball type thing

  7. #27
    Registered User DesertFox24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,129
    Thanks
    59
    Thanked 532 Times in 330 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    23

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Chandler was not a great blocker nor a seam stretcher. O'Leary has a little ways to go in the blocking department but he can block and also catches passes, where Clay is the replacement for Chandler. Plus O'Leary and Clay can line up out wide and in the backfield where Chandler was mostly an inline TE. In other words they wanted versatility because Roman does not want you to know what he is going to do when certain personal groupings are on the field.

  8. Post thanked by:

    Meathead (05-04-2015)

  9. #28
    Insufferable prick and perpetual crybaby Meathead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Outer space
    Posts
    21,349
    Thanks
    3,655
    Thanked 3,785 Times in 2,047 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    78

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    i just wish there were more replays of him blowing up that poor skinny negro kid
    One set of rules for all in the beloved community

  10. Post thanked by:

    BertSquirtgum (05-04-2015)

  11. #29
    Registered User Bill Cody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    11,768
    Thanks
    1,209
    Thanked 5,941 Times in 3,493 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    48

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by better days View Post
    Roman said he wants to have FOUR TE's on the field at times.
    Onside kick unit?

  12. Post thanked by:

    POTLAND PSILBYLO (05-06-2015)

  13. #30
    Registered User BertSquirtgum's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The North Woods
    Posts
    13,379
    Thanks
    4,689
    Thanked 3,399 Times in 2,198 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Pink View Post
    Can he block? No.

    Then it doesn't matter if he's awesome because we invested 2309572903742342345 dollars into the position already and O'Leary will rarely see the field because of it.
    You didn't invest one red cent into the position.

  14. Post thanked by:

    better days (05-04-2015)

  15. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by SpikedLemonade View Post
    And you believe him?

    He is talking out of his ass to get other DCs to waste time preparing for nonsense.

    4 TEs mean that with a QB and the 5 OLs that you either have one RB or one WR.

    Why would a team that has so much money/high draft picks invested in RBs and WRs only play just one of them on any one play?
    Yes, I believe he will use 4 TE's in certain situations like short yardage, 3rd or 4th down plays to pick up a first down & in the red zone on occasion.

  16. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by BertSquirtgum View Post
    You didn't invest one red cent into the position.
    And not only can O'Leary block, but he has a mean streak as well.

    He will fit right in with Incognito & is the type of player Rex likes.

  17. #33
    Peterman Sucks! Mr. Pink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    the fifth ring of hell
    Posts
    35,303
    Thanks
    2,755
    Thanked 10,254 Times in 6,469 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    97

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by BertSquirtgum View Post
    You didn't invest one red cent into the position.


    Wasted pick and O'Leary should be pissed because he'll never get to show his potential in this league because of the situation. But whatever, discuss semantics instead.

  18. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Pink View Post


    Wasted pick and O'Leary should be pissed because he'll never get to show his potential in this league because of the situation. But whatever, discuss semantics instead.
    What are you talking about?

    O'Leary comes into a great situation.

    Roman uses the TE more than most NFL Coaches & Clay is the only TE on the roster that will be ahead of him.

  19. #35
    Registered User feldspar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    13,620
    Thanks
    2,729
    Thanked 8,492 Times in 4,868 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    51

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by better days View Post
    Roman said he wants to have FOUR TE's on the field at times.
    I think you misheard that. I think he meant that he'll suit-up as many as four tight ends on game-day...not that he'll put four tight ends on the field at once. I don't think I've ever seen that.

    I've heard Whaley say that several times, and how Roman's offense is kind of a Tight end-centric" one.

  20. Post thanked by:

    better days (05-05-2015)

  21. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by feldspar View Post
    I think you misheard that. I think he meant that he'll suit-up as many as four tight ends on game-day...not that he'll put four tight ends on the field at once. I don't think I've ever seen that.

    I've heard Whaley say that several times, and how Roman's offense is kind of a Tight end-centric" one.
    Roman did say 4 TE's on the field at once, but he may have meant in uniform as you said ready to play.

    There is no doubt we will see two TE's on the field a number of times during a game.

  22. #37
    Registered User don137's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hilton Head
    Posts
    7,720
    Thanks
    317
    Thanked 485 Times in 254 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    The Bills love his blocking ability. Clay is the pass catching tight end. O'Leary is the blocking TE. Roman loves multiple TEs. He will see the field. He is drafted to replace Lee Smith and not Chandler but he can catch much better than Smith.

  23. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by don137 View Post
    The Bills love his blocking ability. Clay is the pass catching tight end. O'Leary is the blocking TE. Roman loves multiple TEs. He will see the field. He is drafted to replace Lee Smith and not Chandler but he can catch much better than Smith.
    Anyone that did not see the youtube highlight of O'Leary CoolBreeze posted #20, should really look at it.

    That is what O'Leary offers in addition to blocking.

  24. #39
    Registered User justasportsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bundoks
    Posts
    71,540
    Thanks
    4,062
    Thanked 11,469 Times in 7,086 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    292

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    O'Leary was drafted to help improve Sexy Rexy's golf swing!

  25. Post thanked by:

    POTLAND PSILBYLO (05-06-2015)

  26. #40
    Buffalo Bills Fan
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    15,084
    Thanks
    685
    Thanked 3,092 Times in 2,341 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    52

    Re: O'Leary Should Have Gone A Couple Rounds Higher

    Quote Originally Posted by justasportsfan View Post
    O'Leary was drafted to help improve Sexy Rexy's golf swing!
    His nickname has to be "Cow"...
    Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.

  27. Post thanked by:

    better days (05-05-2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •