I'm big on the "maybe"'s. We could have had more of them. We don't. Work this years "maybe"'s sure, and see what comes of them. The results are expected, yeah, but you said you don't know why people are worked up over a 6th for Williams. Those were two maybes, the 6th and the Williams they never used. Those two "maybe"'s are both on Whaley.
I looked up Ozzie Newsome's drafts, he's considered a premium GM and evaluator of talent in general. In his 13 years as Ravens GM, he always had a 6th. If you look through those drafts, Baltimore always loaded up on "maybe"'s. They never look short on late round picks. The more "maybe"'s you have the more talent to sift, means we're sifting less talent, and we are certainly not the Ravens.
Add in Bryce Brown for a 4th, two more "maybe"'s unexplored. That's up to 4. If Brown was a good pickup you don't get Karlos Williams (though debatable by running style), but to me that counts for another and that's a 5 player talent sifting swing total. Catastophic ? Not yet. But if it doesn't make you wonder, you're not being realistic. It's not about crying or whining, it's about looking at cost vs. return. That speaks directly to Whaley's accountability, doesn't it ? The more players you bring in the more chance to find gems if your scouts are worth their salary.
We are not a perennial division contender to be able to afford dorking around sifting talent and wasting "maybe"'s in any round. In my opinion anyway. And it doesn't make me a complainer, it makes me a realist.