Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

  1. #1
    Pinkerton's son Pinkerton Security's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Clifton Park, NY
    Posts
    6,003
    Thanks
    593
    Thanked 959 Times in 522 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    33

    Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Still early but I think hes pretty close...there arent many differences between what I thought and what he has layed out. I have a feeling Rex keeps John Conner just because he is loyal to guys and Conner fits his physical mentality. Would def be glad to see Chris Williams gone, if hes still here come September I'll be shocked.

    http://espn.go.com/blog/buffalo-bill...-53-man-roster

  2. Post thanked by:

    better days (06-12-2015)

  3. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    I hate the fact the Bills reporter is a Patriots* honk.

    But I agree with him about the roster.

  4. Post thanked by:

    trapezeus (06-15-2015)

  5. #3
    Registered User jimmifli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    7,827
    Thanks
    10,020
    Thanked 8,924 Times in 4,182 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    39

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    He has a very punchable face.

  6. Post thanked by:

    Beebe (06-12-2015),better days (06-12-2015)

  7. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,802
    Thanks
    1,988
    Thanked 1,889 Times in 1,080 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    17

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    8 DL and 5 LBs?
    So Rodak is thinking they will be a 4-3?

  8. #5
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,990
    Thanks
    30,642
    Thanked 30,618 Times in 17,485 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Kind of a lazy attempt, IMO, and it doesn't help he isn't plugging in players to positions they are going to see the most action at. I really don't see them going with 4 TE's, and only 8 olinemen. One or two 'unknowns' will make the team (Chandler? Hamilton? ) Would be stunned if Brooks keeps his spot, and think Ladler will have the edge over Meeks.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

  9. #6
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,990
    Thanks
    30,642
    Thanked 30,618 Times in 17,485 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Quote Originally Posted by sudzy View Post
    8 DL and 5 LBs?
    So Rodak is thinking they will be a 4-3?
    Williams, Hughes and Buchanan will be playing OLB, kinda makes me wonder how much Rodak actually knows about the game.

  10. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    607
    Thanks
    517
    Thanked 374 Times in 224 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    Williams, Hughes and Buchanan will be playing OLB, kinda makes me wonder how much Rodak actually knows about the game.
    If you've ever read anything he's ever written previously, your conclusion would be a resounding NOTHING.

    I can't read the guys stuff. He's in competently clueless.

  11. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sparing my telomeres
    Posts
    33,105
    Thanks
    15,700
    Thanked 13,409 Times in 9,123 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Thigpen makes the team. He was a great return man for us last year. I think his QB roster will be different than he writes.

    One of Urbik, Richardson and Kuoandijo will get cut.

    One of the DTs (Bryant, Charles, Carrington) will be gone after Dareus is back.

    I don't think the Bills keep 4 TEs. I don't care about Roman's offense. That position isn't important enough to take up 4 active roster spots. So if O'Leary makes the active roster, then Gragg is gone.

    5 safeties and 11 DBs total? I think the fact Corey Graham can play either position gives them some flexibility to keep only 10 guys - allowing them to keep a player at a tighter position.

  12. #9
    Registered User HHURRICANE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    15,490
    Thanks
    1,144
    Thanked 814 Times in 440 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    57

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    I saw three guys making the team. This is lazy at best.

  13. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Quote Originally Posted by Swiper View Post
    Thigpen makes the team. He was a great return man for us last year. I think his QB roster will be different than he writes.

    One of Urbik, Richardson and Kuoandijo will get cut.

    One of the DTs (Bryant, Charles, Carrington) will be gone after Dareus is back.

    I don't think the Bills keep 4 TEs. I don't care about Roman's offense. That position isn't important enough to take up 4 active roster spots. So if O'Leary makes the active roster, then Gragg is gone.

    5 safeties and 11 DBs total? I think the fact Corey Graham can play either position gives them some flexibility to keep only 10 guys - allowing them to keep a player at a tighter position.
    I disagree about the DT's. I think they all stay. But if one does go, I would expect that to be Bryant.

    I agree about the 4 TE's. I think Gragg & Gray will fight for the last TE spot in TC. I expect O'Leary to make the team.

    I also agree about all the DB's. I think Ladler or Meeks gets cut. Or maybe they both get cut.

  14. #11
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,990
    Thanks
    30,642
    Thanked 30,618 Times in 17,485 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Quote Originally Posted by Swiper View Post
    Thigpen makes the team. He was a great return man for us last year. I think his QB roster will be different than he writes.

    One of Urbik, Richardson and Kuoandijo will get cut.

    One of the DTs (Bryant, Charles, Carrington) will be gone after Dareus is back.

    I don't think the Bills keep 4 TEs. I don't care about Roman's offense. That position isn't important enough to take up 4 active roster spots. So if O'Leary makes the active roster, then Gragg is gone.

    5 safeties and 11 DBs total? I think the fact Corey Graham can play either position gives them some flexibility to keep only 10 guys - allowing them to keep a player at a tighter position.
    Given different circumstances I think Thigpen would make the final roster also, but the acquisition of Harvin makes him expendable.

  15. Post thanked by:

    swiper (06-14-2015)

  16. #12
    Administrator DraftBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    107,450
    Thanks
    4,847
    Thanked 24,471 Times in 14,179 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    276

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Quote Originally Posted by YardRat View Post
    Williams, Hughes and Buchanan will be playing OLB, kinda makes me wonder how much Rodak actually knows about the game.
    I think he's going by how the Bills roster currently has them listed. It's odd regardless but that's the only logical conclusion I can make.
    COMING SOON...
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

  17. Post thanked by:

    YardRat (06-14-2015)

  18. #13
    Administrator DraftBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    107,450
    Thanks
    4,847
    Thanked 24,471 Times in 14,179 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    276

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Some notes that intrigued me, he has the Bills 5th and 7th Round picks both getting cut. Not a huge surprise for a 7th Rounder but if you lose your 5th Rounder because he can't play then you just drafted poorly. For those that don't recall I blasted the Steward pick after the draft as a wasted one.

    I think almost any of the cut WR's could take spots from Goodwin and/or Hogan. I also think they take away a TE spot (Gragg, imo) and add Thigpen on in a specialist only role.

    Having 5 ILB's seems like overkill to me, wouldn't be surprised if the Bills tried to pick a spot here to keep Gay on the roster. They have some versatility in their defensive scheme so they don't need all the ILB's with the way Ryan moves guys around.

  19. Post thanked by:

    YardRat (06-14-2015)

  20. #14
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,990
    Thanks
    30,642
    Thanked 30,618 Times in 17,485 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Here's my preliminary shot at one...

    QB---EJ, Cassel, Taylor (3)
    RB---McCoy, Jackson, Dixon, Williams (4)
    FB---Felton (1)

    I really don't see the team keeping two FB's, but wouldn't be too shocked (just disappointed) if Conner made the team over Boobie. Ryan didn't bring him in to be a warm body, and Roman already let Dixon walk once. Dumb if they do, but possible.

    TE---Clay, O'Leary, Gray (3)
    WR---Watkins, Woods, Harvin, Hogan, Easley, Brown. (6)

    I don't see them keeping 4 TE's, and Gragg has proven nothing. They'll probably keep an extra olineman for jumbo packages, but would still like to see them replace Clay Lite (Gray) with a blocking TE. I think Goodwin is gone, barring an injury to one of the top three. I really like Thigpen also, but as I said earlier Harvin makes him expendable (unfortunately) I would bring him back before Goodwin.

    C---Wood, Urbik (2)
    G---Incognito, Miller, Richardson (3)
    T---Glenn, Henderson, Kouandijo, Chandler (4)

    I honestly think Cyril or Cyrus are going to go on IR for the season and get one more shot next year to prove something, and Williams should be injury-settled. I wouldn't be surprised to see a late acquisition, vet FA to fill out the squad.

    DT---KW, Hamilton. (2)
    DE---Dareus, Carrington, Charles, Bryant, Wynn. (5)

    Bryant and Charles can also play DT, Wynn may go when Dareus' suspension is over.

    OLB---Mario, Hughes, Lawson, Buchanon, Johnson. (5)
    ILB---Brown, Bradham, Powell. (3)

    Rex likes specialist OLB's, Buchanon could be his current version of Maybin. Don't need too many ILB's, Ryan likes to plug in safeties more than Pettine or Schwartz.

    CB---Gilmore, McKelvin, Graham, Darby, Robey, Cockrell. (6)

    I just don't see Brooks making this team (he shouldn't) and Cockrell is still young. At some point a corner is going to go down and open up a spot for somebody like Butler.

    S---AWilliams, DWilliams, Rambo, Ladler. (4)

    Graham is also playing safety, Rambo is more of a traditional 'last guy standing' FS, and IMO Ladler is going to show up this training camp enough to beat out Meeks and the others.

    LS---Sanborn
    P---Schmitt
    PK---Carpenter (3 st total)

    I believe that's 54, and Wynn going when Marcel comes back will be 53. If they really do want to keep two kickers, I agree with DB it'll probably be at the expense of a LBer (Johnson or Powell).

  21. Post thanked by:

    DraftBoy (06-14-2015),jimmifli (06-14-2015),swiper (06-14-2015)

  22. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    607
    Thanks
    517
    Thanked 374 Times in 224 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Quote Originally Posted by DraftBoy View Post
    Some notes that intrigued me, he has the Bills 5th and 7th Round picks both getting cut. Not a huge surprise for a 7th Rounder but if you lose your 5th Rounder because he can't play then you just drafted poorly. For those that don't recall I blasted the Steward pick after the draft as a wasted one.

    I think almost any of the cut WR's could take spots from Goodwin and/or Hogan. I also think they take away a TE spot (Gragg, imo) and add Thigpen on in a specialist only role.

    Having 5 ILB's seems like overkill to me, wouldn't be surprised if the Bills tried to pick a spot here to keep Gay on the roster. They have some versatility in their defensive scheme so they don't need all the ILB's with the way Ryan moves guys around.
    I see this completely differently.

    If a 5th rounder is getting cut it's because you have a deep, talented roster. Sure there are occasions where you find a diamond in the rough that late, but if a 5th round pick is a lock to make your team at this point, you've got some serious problems.

  23. Post thanked by:

    better days (06-15-2015)

  24. #16
    Administrator DraftBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    107,450
    Thanks
    4,847
    Thanked 24,471 Times in 14,179 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    276

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Quote Originally Posted by Jry44 View Post
    I see this completely differently.

    If a 5th rounder is getting cut it's because you have a deep, talented roster. Sure there are occasions where you find a diamond in the rough that late, but if a 5th round pick is a lock to make your team at this point, you've got some serious problems.
    You look at this roster of LB's and see a deep and talented roster?

  25. #17
    Registered User Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    9,234
    Thanks
    421
    Thanked 3,428 Times in 2,006 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    He only has the Bills keeping 8 OL, but Rex always kept 9 when he was with the Jets and I think it's pretty common for most teams to keep 9. So I would add OT Tyson Chandler and get rid of one of the 11 DB's he has making the team. Most likely Jonathan Meeks. He probably should have gone undrafted and has been pretty useless.

  26. #18
    Moderator Yasgur's Farm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,091
    Thanks
    1,240
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 621 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    EJ haters must not see this thread as a threat.

  27. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    22,028
    Thanks
    10,000
    Thanked 3,698 Times in 2,473 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    Quote Originally Posted by Jry44 View Post
    I see this completely differently.

    If a 5th rounder is getting cut it's because you have a deep, talented roster. Sure there are occasions where you find a diamond in the rough that late, but if a 5th round pick is a lock to make your team at this point, you've got some serious problems.
    IMO, if a 5th rnd pick can make the practice squad & develop, he was a good pick.

  28. #20
    Legendary Zoner trapezeus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    19,525
    Thanks
    4,356
    Thanked 3,218 Times in 1,859 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    67

    Re: Mike Rodak's projected 53 man roster

    hard to read rodak.

  29. Post thanked by:

    better days (06-15-2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •