ROR

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ct bills fan
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 750

    #16
    Re: ROR

    Originally posted by coastal View Post
    SOderburg to Colorado.

    ROR is gone. Avs just shot their trade leverage
    Nah - there are a lot of teams that would like O'reilly, doesn't impact their leverage all that much. It'll be very interesting what they get for him

    Comment

    • MitchMurrayDowntown
      Skoobasaurus-Rex
      • Oct 2011
      • 22284

      #17
      Re: ROR

      Hmmm... how is this going to go ?

      Comment

      • ct bills fan
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 750

        #18
        Re: ROR

        If Sabres want him I'd guess it'll cost 21 and a defenseman

        Comment

        • coastal
          Legendary Zoner
          • Mar 2005
          • 15513

          #19
          Re: ROR

          Bogosian

          Comment

          • Crisis
            Registered User
            • Aug 2004
            • 12738

            #20
            Re: ROR

            Originally posted by coastal View Post
            Bogosian
            Hell no.
            Originally posted by LOSman WINS
            Vanek is Austrian not European
            Originally posted by Prov401
            Pacquiao isn't asian. He's from the philippines
            Originally posted by better days
            I will not be surprised if Tebow has more success than Peyton in the NFL.

            Comment

            • snow1989
              Registered User
              • Sep 2003
              • 932

              #21
              Re: ROR

              Originally posted by coastal View Post
              If u offer him 8 at 60 mil he isn't going to turn it down
              Of course he's not going to turn it down.....he'd be taking anyone that paid him that much to the cleaners. Sorry...I'd pass, especially at 8 yrs, 60 million....for what? A guy who has scored 20+ goals ONCE in his career?? Whose plus/minus is usually minus?? No thanks, there's cheaper options.
              I've upped my standards...now up yours

              Comment

              • Night Train
                Retired - On Several Levels
                • Jul 2005
                • 33117

                #22
                Re: ROR

                Originally posted by coastal View Post
                Bogosian
                He was our best player at the end of the season. No way in hell.
                Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

                Comment

                • ct bills fan
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 750

                  #23
                  Re: ROR

                  We may end up with no draft picks until rd 4 after Eichel. 21 may got towards ROR and 31 and 51 may go for Talbot or Lack and Bieska.

                  Comment

                  • coastal
                    Legendary Zoner
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 15513

                    #24
                    Re: ROR

                    Originally posted by Night Train View Post
                    He was our best player at the end of the season. No way in hell.
                    He was? How so?

                    Comment

                    • snow1989
                      Registered User
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 932

                      #25
                      Re: ROR

                      Originally posted by ct bills fan View Post
                      We may end up with no draft picks until rd 4 after Eichel. 21 may got towards ROR and 31 and 51 may go for Talbot or Lack and Bieska.

                      Murray is an idiot if he uses 21st pick for ROR....the guy has ONE 20+ goal seasons, and is a "minus" overall player. Unless ROR is packaged with a return draft pick, a prospect, or someone else half decent...it would just be stupid in such a deep draft to use it on just ROR...

                      Bieska? Bieska? What the hell do we want with a 34yr old D-man that's game is fading??
                      I've upped my standards...now up yours

                      Comment

                      • chernobylwraiths
                        Registered User
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 41838

                        #26
                        Re: ROR

                        Originally posted by ct bills fan View Post
                        We may end up with no draft picks until rd 4 after Eichel. 21 may got towards ROR and 31 and 51 may go for Talbot or Lack and Bieska.
                        in order
                        fine
                        I hope not
                        no way
                        no ***** way

                        Comment

                        • ct bills fan
                          Registered User
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 750

                          #27
                          Re: ROR

                          Don't kill the messenger.

                          Comment

                          • mightysimi
                            Buckle me in on the highway of sin
                            • Mar 2010
                            • 6334

                            #28
                            Re: ROR

                            Originally posted by snow1989 View Post
                            Murray is an idiot if he uses 21st pick for ROR....the guy has ONE 20+ goal seasons, and is a "minus" overall player. Unless ROR is packaged with a return draft pick, a prospect, or someone else half decent...it would just be stupid in such a deep draft to use it on just ROR...

                            Bieska? Bieska? What the hell do we want with a 34yr old D-man that's game is fading??
                            He would immediately walk into your second pairing that's why. You can't play all kids if you want to win.

                            Comment

                            • THATHURMANATOR
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 69112

                              #29
                              Re: ROR

                              Originally posted by snow1989 View Post
                              Murray is an idiot if he uses 21st pick for ROR....the guy has ONE 20+ goal seasons, and is a "minus" overall player. Unless ROR is packaged with a return draft pick, a prospect, or someone else half decent...it would just be stupid in such a deep draft to use it on just ROR...

                              Bieska? Bieska? What the hell do we want with a 34yr old D-man that's game is fading??

                              ROR would cost a lot more than the 21st pick. Where have you been?

                              - - - Updated - - -

                              All moot point anyways since it was traded already for Lehner.

                              Comment

                              • MitchMurrayDowntown
                                Skoobasaurus-Rex
                                • Oct 2011
                                • 22284

                                #30
                                Re: ROR

                                OK, lets shelve the ROR BS. I'm sick of seeing ROR / ROR / ROR, everyone mumbling about it on here can stick it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X