Re: Bills sign OT Wayne Hunter
I guess my ultimate point is that you need bodies in training camp. We are thin at OT. If he was signed simply to have a knowledgeable body for fill-in duty then it makes a lot of sense. You can't run a practice that requires 4 OTs when you only have 3, for example. If they honestly think he's going to contribute when the live bullets are flying, then we are even more desperate than i thought.
But i could see myself signing a familiar face for the purpose of running a camp.
Time will tell. For my part, i'm just praying that the theory that Marrone is so bad of a coach that our OL looked far worse than it is capable of being is true.
I don't think there's any question that Marrone did a really bad job with that unit. How good (or bad) we are on the OL remains to be seen. I know we have some big dudes though. Lets hope they can benefit from a superior scheme. I rest easy knowing full well that virtually any scheme is better than the one we ran the last few years.
Sans Levitre, this is the same unit that helped spiller gain over 5 yards per carry under Chan Gailey.
Hunter cannot possibly be a serious part of the plan at that spot. I hope...
Originally posted by Mace
View Post
But i could see myself signing a familiar face for the purpose of running a camp.
Time will tell. For my part, i'm just praying that the theory that Marrone is so bad of a coach that our OL looked far worse than it is capable of being is true.
I don't think there's any question that Marrone did a really bad job with that unit. How good (or bad) we are on the OL remains to be seen. I know we have some big dudes though. Lets hope they can benefit from a superior scheme. I rest easy knowing full well that virtually any scheme is better than the one we ran the last few years.
Sans Levitre, this is the same unit that helped spiller gain over 5 yards per carry under Chan Gailey.
Hunter cannot possibly be a serious part of the plan at that spot. I hope...
Comment