Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 36 of 36

Thread: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

  1. #21
    Registered User Ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    9,192
    Thanks
    420
    Thanked 3,414 Times in 1,996 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    43

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fixxxer View Post
    Really? I remember fans and media drooling with Warmack as a OG prospect. Joeckel is a suprise too.
    Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Joeckel I guess isn't that surprising since he's struggled with injuries and has been a big disappointment, but people talked about Warmack like he was the greatest OG prospect ever.

  2. #22
    Moderator Yasgur's Farm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,091
    Thanks
    1,240
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 621 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Fo Sho View Post
    If our defense holds on the last Jags drive, EJ would have led the Bills to the 2nd greatest comeback in their history after being the sole reason for the comeback to be necessary.
    Exactly... This only meltdown of his career was countered by a very nice comeback for the Bills. EJ and the offense actually gained a 4th quarter lead, only to have the D fold with the help of the refs of course.

  3. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sparing my telomeres
    Posts
    33,105
    Thanks
    15,700
    Thanked 13,409 Times in 9,123 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Bills Decline to pick up 2017 Manuel option

    Quote Originally Posted by DraftBoy View Post
    That's Cardale Jones spot in 2017.
    Unplug one heaping pile of crap, plug in another cheaper one.

  4. Post thanked by:

    Victor7 (05-03-2016),WagonCircler (05-03-2016)

  5. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sparing my telomeres
    Posts
    33,105
    Thanks
    15,700
    Thanked 13,409 Times in 9,123 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yasgur's Farm View Post
    Not surprising... That option year is expensive for a projected back-up. But don't be surprised to see him re-sign for a modest salary in 2017.

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...nuel/#comments


    Those stats mentioned actually complete an entire 16 game season... 59.1%, 3,371 yards, 211 yards/game, 19 TD's, 15 INT's, 4 fumbles... Not terrible regardless of the hate.

    Go ahead... Flame away.
    At least you recognize that 85% of Bills fans realize that you're full of crap.

    And we're waiting for you to remind us that you're not an EJ fan. ROFL.

  6. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sparing my telomeres
    Posts
    33,105
    Thanks
    15,700
    Thanked 13,409 Times in 9,123 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    I guess overthrowing that TE by pumping the ball into the PR tent doesn't count against him anymore.

  7. #26
    Moderator Yasgur's Farm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,091
    Thanks
    1,240
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 621 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    Have your fun swiper... It's easy to be a big shot in make believe land.

  8. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sparing my telomeres
    Posts
    33,105
    Thanks
    15,700
    Thanked 13,409 Times in 9,123 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    You told us you weren't an EJ fan more than once. Yet you have never had anything but good things to say about him. Hmmmm.

  9. #28
    Moderator Yasgur's Farm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,091
    Thanks
    1,240
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 621 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    Because I believe he is what he is... Not some fabricated piece of **** that you insist on making him into. It's almost as though you caught your boyfriend lusting after him.

  10. Post thanked by:

    trapezeus (05-03-2016)

  11. #29
    Making Spirits Bright Joe Fo Sho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    6,194
    Thanks
    1,272
    Thanked 3,595 Times in 1,857 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    34

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yasgur's Farm View Post
    Exactly... This only meltdown of his career was countered by a very nice comeback for the Bills. EJ and the offense actually gained a 4th quarter lead, only to have the D fold with the help of the refs of course.
    The defense technically 'gained the 4th quarter lead' after a Corey Graham pick 6. Our defense had given up 7 points up until that last drive not counting the short field EJ gave them after his 2nd INT. The Bills defense basically had a net of -7 on the day, which should have been good enough to win by 20 points. We lost 34-31.

    I think EJ gets a bad rap from that game, which is understandable. I just think that he's deserving of the role that he's in today, and I'm fine with him being the backup. Even if his contract wasn't fully guaranteed, I'd have kept him on as a backup instead of signing a guy like Hoyer in free agency.

  12. Post thanked by:

    Mace (05-03-2016),Yasgur's Farm (05-03-2016)

  13. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sparing my telomeres
    Posts
    33,105
    Thanks
    15,700
    Thanked 13,409 Times in 9,123 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Yasgur's Farm View Post
    Because I believe he is what he is... Not some fabricated piece of **** that you insist on making him into. It's almost as though you caught your boyfriend lusting after him.

    No. I just see what he is. You cannot.

  14. #31
    Moderator Yasgur's Farm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,091
    Thanks
    1,240
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 621 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    These will be my final comments regarding swiper.

    See Jo Fo Sho comments above... Those are clear sighted observations and reasonable comments.

    Swiper, on the other hand, wants to make everything into something that it's not. Like diverting to "you're an EJ fan".

  15. #32
    Registered User Arm of Harm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    586
    Thanked 787 Times in 512 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    Yasgur's Farm wrote:

    > Those stats mentioned actually complete an entire 16 game season... 59.1%, 3,371 yards, 211 yards/game, 19 TD's, 15 INT's, 4 fumbles... Not terrible regardless of the hate.

    I'll grant that on paper, those stats look decent. Not great by any means. Not solid. But decent.

    However, there are additional numbers which should also be taken into account. One article I read indicated that over 90% of Manuel's throws were to targets within ten yards of himself. Not ten yards in front of the line of scrimmage. Ten yards or less from wherever Manuel happened to be standing when throwing the ball.

    I'm just a random guy. I have no special expertise at the quarterback position. But if I'm throwing the ball around with my friends, I find it ridiculously easy to hit a target ten yards or less from where I'm standing. Lots of other people can do the same. 90% of Manuel's throws were throws you'd expect any middle school quarterback to be able to consistently make.

    Back when he was the starter, Manuel had (IIRC) the lowest air yards per attempt of any starting QB in the NFL. Total yards per attempt = air yards per attempt + yards after the catch. Manuel's total yards per attempt looked like it had a hint of credibility. But that was because players like Sammy Watkins and Fred Jackson were doing a good job of generating yards after the catch.

    Joe Montana helped his receivers generate good YAC by hitting them in perfect stride. But Manuel's targets were typically stationary. In the (relatively rare) instances when they weren't stationary, they were typically moving vertically. Almost never was he asked to hit targets moving horizontally. Because Manuel didn't do anything to help generate YAC, using stats which credit QBs for YAC yards merely confuses the issue. The correct stat for evaluating Manuel is air yards per attempt. In that stat, his ranking was at the bottom.

    Back when Manuel was under center, the Bills' offense was designed to hide their weakness at quarterback. Manuel should have been used to an offense like that, because that was also the offense he ran at FSU.

  16. Post thanked by:

    Mr. Pink (05-04-2016),Slick (05-03-2016),swiper (05-03-2016),trapezeus (05-04-2016),WagonCircler (05-03-2016)

  17. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Sparing my telomeres
    Posts
    33,105
    Thanks
    15,700
    Thanked 13,409 Times in 9,123 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    0

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    Thanks for the proclamation there Yasgur. Doesn't make you smart, nor does it take back all the garbage you've spewed regarding Manuel since he's been drafted.

  18. #34
    Registered User Victor7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    1,270
    Thanks
    1,494
    Thanked 1,137 Times in 574 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    13

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    I would be elated if not for the fact that Whaley already drafted his replacement in a less accurate (imagine that) bigger version in Cardale Jones.

    Now watch us hold on to that bum for 3-4 years minimum.

    It seems like we are destined to pay for some guy to pretend to be a quarterback on our roster for as long as DW is our GM.

  19. Post thanked by:

    swiper (05-03-2016)

  20. #35
    Haha...yeah you think so ? Mace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Buffalo
    Posts
    20,301
    Thanks
    25,330
    Thanked 16,494 Times in 9,189 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    62

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    I don't really see the point in arguing about Manuel or Jones. We're going to try and make it to 9-7 on Tyrod Taylor and Ryan's defense somehow dramatically improving. We're not going into the playoffs to contend for a Super Bowl this year. If Taylor goes down, Manuel, Jones, Lynch, Hoyer, McCown, Fitzpatrick, Prescott, or Cook would not be spearheading some miraculous run unless you're too caught up in a daydream.

    And next year is another year, there will be more QBs, maybe a shot at The Chad. Maybe Taylor will prove himself. Maybe the defense will improve. Maybe Manuel or Jones will show something. But the D has to improve. Denver just won a Super Bowl with a spent Peyton Manning, because of their D, and just enough O.

    The O will not become a 90's Bills blitzkrieg. Hope for the D to improve and figure the QB situation will start sorting itself out.

  21. #36
    Well, lookie here... YardRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A hole in your wall.
    Posts
    85,873
    Thanks
    30,555
    Thanked 30,559 Times in 17,443 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    243

    Re: Report - Manuel Option Not Picked Up ?

    I'd still take Warmack right now, in a second.
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY
    #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •