Is Taylor interception-adverse?

[stuckincincy]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Who are you talking about? I mentioned Gillislee and Karlos, neither played for BAL.



Yeah, that's what an average does. It factors in big yard plays and small yard plays, and everything in between.



I'm not going to argue against any of that.



No.



Why would anyone have traded for a backup QB who had only 35 passes in 4 years?

Only the Bills and Broncos were trying to sign him this offseason. The Broncos wanted him because Kubiak was his coordinator in Baltimore.

Gee, that must have been a lot of work to dig up those necroposts and mine them.

Use your powers for good! Make spirits bright!

[Pinkerton Security]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Gee, that must have been a lot of work to dig up those necroposts and mine them.

Use your powers for good! Make spirits bright!

Copy and paste is real tough these days...

[stuckincincy]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Copy and paste is real tough these days...

But what is the possible motivation to dig into past posts and place them (out of context) in a new thread? It wouldn't occur to me to bother or care. Unless I had some sort of agenda.

[Joe Fo Sho]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

But what is the possible motivation to dig into past posts and place them (out of context) in a new thread? It wouldn't occur to me to bother or care. Unless I had some sort of agenda.

What did I do? I feel like I'm missing something. I responded to a post you wrote 10 minutes before my response, in a thread that was started that same day, yesterday.

[ParanoidAndroid]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Nobody?

*averse*

[stuckincincy]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Nobody?

*averse*

Don't hang out your shingle for typos...

[Mr. Cynical]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Probably is now.

[Joe Fo Sho]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Don't hang out your shingle for typos...

Nice necropost.

[stuckincincy]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Nice necropost.

Necropost? How so? I replied to a post today in a thread that was started within a week ago...explain yourself, please.

[ParanoidAndroid]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Don't hang out your shingle for typos...

Long-dead idioms are cool. No, for real.

[Joe Fo Sho]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Necropost? How so? I replied to a post today in a thread that was started within a week ago...explain yourself, please.

You first.

Gee, that must have been a lot of work to dig up those necroposts and mine them.

Use your powers for good! Make spirits bright!

http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/showthread.php/235116-Is-Taylor-interception-adverse?p=4264503&viewfull=1#post4264503

Post #16 in this thread.

[WagonCircler]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

Tyrod is winning-averse. So is EJ. So is Rex. So is Whaley. So is Brandon.

This organization is a steaming pile of manure.

It wouldn't be nearly as annoying if they were just incompetent. But they're all so arrogant (Whaley, Ryan, Brandon) and think they're so much smarter than everyone else, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: Is Taylor interception-adverse?

It's not hard to throw INTs when you're unwilling to take any chances.