Draft Watson at all costs. He is a leader and guys follow him.
Get Watson then it will all fall into place.
Draft Watson at all costs. He is a leader and guys follow him.
Get Watson then it will all fall into place.
djjimkelly (03-05-2017),Mace (03-05-2017)
Mace (03-02-2017),Night Train (03-05-2017),swiper (03-05-2017)
I would argue that all the QBs we've acquired during the post-Kelly era were destined to fail regardless of coaching.
Take a guy like Rob Johnson for example. Was he put in a bad situation? Absolutely! The offensive line was horrendous, especially at pass protection. Ultimately his career in Buffalo fizzled out, after which he went to Tampa Bay as a backup. He said that one of the things which attracted him to Tampa was the good coaching (Jon Gruden). But Rob Johnson never amounted to anything in Tampa, despite having received Gruden's coaching.
Drew Bledsoe was essentially the same guy in Dallas as he'd been in Buffalo, except older and less capable. He even gave the Cowboys an initial eight game burst of good play before settling down to his usual self.
J.P. Losman and Trent Edwards were forced out of the NFL due to being unable to secure a roster spot. This, in what should have been the prime of their respective careers. If good coaching could have fixed them, you'd think that some good coach would have figured this out, and would have gotten them a space on his roster.
E.J. Manuel is what he was in college. Coaching isn't going to fix that.
Granted, the Bills' coaching during the post-Kelly era has typically been lacking. But the specific QBs the Bills drafted wouldn't have succeeded no matter what coaching they'd received.
Last edited by Arm of Harm; 03-05-2017 at 12:02 PM.
Albany,n.y. (03-05-2017),Mouldsie (03-05-2017),Mr. Pink (03-05-2017)
The whole Losman thing was laughable from so many angles it still pisses me off to this day.
Missedon Aaron Rodgers because we chased the 5th best QB in a draft with our future picks. We'd laugh if it was any other team.
You'll have to find a link and prove it. Gailey never started a rookie unless he absolutely had to.
http://pro32.ap.org/content/russell-...-bills-50-17-0Gailey acknowledged he had shown interest in Wilson, but was concerned that, at 5-foot-11 and 206 pounds, he might be too small to succeed at the NFL level.
Disagree.
"If good coaching could have fixed them, , you'd think that some good coach would have figured this out, and would have gotten them a space on his roster."
I'm not talking about fixing them, I'm talking about developing them. Poorly developed QB's are rarely "fixed", they're discarded because there's a fresh crop at a position with notoriously short attention span. It's prohibitive to get a developmental QB who has already spent several years with his habits, and now he's older and more expensive than one you can draft and develop.
You simply can't get a developmental QB and not develop him, but expect him to develop himself, then conclude he's the same as last year, draft another developmental QB you don't develop....rinse and repeat.
I'll mention again, Dallas adapted offense to Prescott the 5th round pick, Belichick started Brady out with a rushing offense before letting him pass more and more, and you see QB's coming out of NE with sound fundamentals if ultimately limited by their skill when they end up elsewhere.
That's development and it's coaching impact on player progress.
I can agree with you we don't get the best players at the position. But again, if you get a developmental guy from a spread or air raid, you know he's going to need developing. It's self defeating to not have anyone to develop them.