Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
I hope Al Cowlings picks OJ up from prison. Think he can find an old Ford Bronco.
Last edited by sudzy; 07-20-2017 at 06:50 PM.
swiper (07-21-2017)
djjimkelly (07-21-2017),Historian (07-22-2017),Skooby (07-21-2017),sudzy (07-21-2017),WagonCircler (07-21-2017)
I think so, too. Jason was lawyered-up by somebody the day after. His violent, manic behavior that had him taking divalproex sodium, etc.
As I watched the trial, I remember thinking
1) What motive would he have to kill Nicole?
and then
2) as the trial proceeded - OJ is working a plan.
Last edited by stuckincincy; 07-20-2017 at 08:19 PM.
Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.
Skooby (07-21-2017)
This reminds me of one of my favorite political cartoons. There is a picture of Bill Clinton and O.J. Simpson with golf clubs in their hands, presumably at a golf course. Bill Clinton says to O.J., "I vow never to rest until I find the real recipients of Monica's sexual favors!"
Historian (07-22-2017)
Skooby (07-21-2017)
Generalissimus Gibby (07-21-2017),sudzy (07-21-2017)
The court said he was found not guilty, it never said he was innocent.
Not guilty means that there was not enough evidence to move a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Innocent means that one has not committed a crime. A jury doesn't find a person innocent.
Tomatoes, Tamotoes, still I hate hearing anyone say OJ was innocent.
Last edited by kishoph; 07-22-2017 at 02:00 AM.
Arm of Harm (07-23-2017)
ROFL. LINK
Innocent = not guilty. School failed you.
Do you really think that there aren't people who are in jail who are innocent of crimes they were convicted of?
Do you really think that guilty people don't get off on technicalities, or other loopholes? Or their lawyers are better than the opposition's?
We aren't talking about semantics here...what "innocent" means. We are talking about the court of law. We are talking about how a dozen people apply "reasonable doubt."
If you see what the OJ jurors actually think, you would see that lots actually think he at least probably did it, but they had to act on the reasonable doubt. I've seen and read interviews. This trial was a circus, and the prosecution totally dropped the ball.
It's a game. And forget your dictionary...not guilty does not equal innocent in the court of law.
Last edited by feldspar; 07-22-2017 at 05:56 AM.
Arm of Harm (07-23-2017)
Mark Fuhrman is a special kind of piece of ****.