Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 121 to 135 of 135

Thread: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

  1. #121
    Moderator DraftBoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    92,933
    Thanks
    4,075
    Thanked 18,205 Times in 10,255 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    237

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by Night Train View Post
    I've posted the same. She IS the best candidate for their party and is the only one that isn't a socialist. Balanced ideas.

    Backing the wrong candidate. No surprise.
    She’s really not. Her only hope is to catch on as a VP nod and I don’t see that happening at the moment.
    COMING SOON...
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Lecter
    We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

  2. #122
    Registered User Canadian'eh!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fredericton, NB
    Posts
    6,539
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 775 Times in 442 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    34

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    How is Biden still in this race? His voting record is terrible. He's not a good speaker (major understatement). All he does is bring up Obama over and over and over. It's really all he has. "Remember Obama? I was his VP. I practically AM him. Seriously.... Obama.... Joerack Obiden baby!"

    He's awful....

  3. Post thanked by:

    Discotrish (02-26-2020),Woodman (02-26-2020),YardRat (02-26-2020)

  4. #123
    Legendary Zoner Woodman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    10,224
    Thanks
    1,873
    Thanked 1,882 Times in 1,417 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    29

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Here's the deal me and Barack are tight I mean so tight I asked him not to endorse me.
    It's been Joe Biden's dream all of his life to be the democrats nominee for President of the United States of America it's just a shame he's not here to enjoy it.

    Terms of Conduct & Service


    With the 22nd pick Buffalo selects :

    Cesar Ruiz ( Interior lineman Michigan)





  5. #124
    Registered User sukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    10,518
    Thanks
    2,316
    Thanked 4,365 Times in 2,692 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    30

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    So Bernie wrote an essay, albeit decades ago, saying toddlers should run around naked. They would see each otherís generals and maybe even touch them. This would bankrupt the porn industry that feeds on sexual frustrations.

    the notion of women getting cancer from frequent orgasms is also really wacky.

    nothing last night?

  6. #125
    Proudly victimizing the victimizer's victimizer and cracking soreheads Tailgunner Joe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    1,509
    Thanks
    1,470
    Thanked 764 Times in 472 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    4

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by Canadian'eh! View Post
    How is Biden still in this race? His voting record is terrible. He's not a good speaker (major understatement). All he does is bring up Obama over and over and over. It's really all he has. "Remember Obama? I was his VP. I practically AM him. Seriously.... Obama.... Joerack Obiden baby!"

    He's awful....
    Leave Mason Verger alone, he is still dealing with the after effects of that horrendously botched plastic surgery he had.

  7. #126
    Raging hypocrite and resident troll
    Discotrish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Native: West Seneca Now: Florida
    Posts
    34,017
    Thanks
    2,500
    Thanked 4,749 Times in 3,385 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    90

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by sukie View Post
    So Bernie wrote an essay, albeit decades ago, saying toddlers should run around naked. They would see each otherís generals and maybe even touch them. This would bankrupt the porn industry that feeds on sexual frustrations.

    the notion of women getting cancer from frequent orgasms is also really wacky.

    nothing last night?
    He went Full E. Jean Carroll in that essay.


  8. #127
    Registered User Canadian'eh!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fredericton, NB
    Posts
    6,539
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 775 Times in 442 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    34

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by sukie View Post
    So Bernie wrote an essay, albeit decades ago, saying toddlers should run around naked. They would see each other’s generals and maybe even touch them. This would bankrupt the porn industry that feeds on sexual frustrations.

    the notion of women getting cancer from frequent orgasms is also really wacky.

    nothing last night?
    Two things. Some of Sanders essays are completely out of context. The "rape fantasy" one was about toxic traditional gender roles. he was referencing romantic novels and the content that sells. He wasn't implying ALL women have rape fantasy...

    the others i've not read in full. Some of it sounds like 1969 things that turned out to be just wrong and dumb, but people were thinking might have some validity in 1969. He seemed to suggest there could be some link between the inability of women to achieve orgasm and cervical cancer..... which obviously isn't true. Though there's a link with HPV from sexual contact, i'm betting they didn't know that in 1969. So, a link between sex and Cervical cancer, might have been being questioned. i mean... it was 50 years ago! he MIGHT have learned some things in 50 years.

  9. #128
    Registered User sukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    10,518
    Thanks
    2,316
    Thanked 4,365 Times in 2,692 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    30

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by Canadian'eh! View Post
    Two things. Some of Sanders essays are completely out of context. The "rape fantasy" one was about toxic traditional gender roles. he was referencing romantic novels and the content that sells. He wasn't implying ALL women have rape fantasy...

    the others i've not read in full. Some of it sounds like 1969 things that turned out to be just wrong and dumb, but people were thinking might have some validity in 1969. He seemed to suggest there could be some link between the inability of women to achieve orgasm and cervical cancer..... which obviously isn't true. Though there's a link with HPV from sexual contact, i'm betting they didn't know that in 1969. So, a link between sex and Cervical cancer, might have been being questioned. i mean... it was 50 years ago! he MIGHT have learned some things in 50 years.
    Naturally it was 70s but this wasn’t about sex it was orgasms causing cancer. One doesn’t need sex for that.

  10. #129
    Registered User justasportsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bundoks
    Posts
    61,354
    Thanks
    2,648
    Thanked 8,251 Times in 4,822 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    232

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by sukie View Post
    So Bernie wrote an essay, albeit decades ago, saying toddlers should run around naked. They would see each other’s generals and maybe even touch them. This would bankrupt the porn industry that feeds on sexual frustrations.

    the notion of women getting cancer from frequent orgasms is also really wacky.

    nothing last night?
    he's

  11. #130
    Proud Sorehead!!! Historian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Upstairs
    Posts
    47,673
    Thanks
    21,490
    Thanked 18,647 Times in 9,915 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    165

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by sukie View Post
    So Bernie wrote an essay, albeit decades ago, saying toddlers should run around naked. They would see each other’s generals and maybe even touch them. This would bankrupt the porn industry that feeds on sexual frustrations.

  12. #131
    Registered User justasportsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bundoks
    Posts
    61,354
    Thanks
    2,648
    Thanked 8,251 Times in 4,822 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    232

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by Discotrish View Post
    He went Full E. Jean Carroll in that essay.
    is it true you fantasize about getting tied up and raped?

  13. #132
    Registered User justasportsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Bundoks
    Posts
    61,354
    Thanks
    2,648
    Thanked 8,251 Times in 4,822 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    232

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by Historian View Post
    is this really appropriate?

  14. #133
    Raging hypocrite and resident troll
    Discotrish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Native: West Seneca Now: Florida
    Posts
    34,017
    Thanks
    2,500
    Thanked 4,749 Times in 3,385 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    90

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by justasportsfan View Post
    is it true you fantasize about getting tied up and raped?
    Quote Originally Posted by justasportsfan View Post
    is this really appropriate?
    Why no, no it isn't.

    How about that Patton Oswalt guy?

    Some creepy tweets right there.

    Patti

  15. #134
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    16,532
    Thanks
    10,353
    Thanked 6,936 Times in 4,295 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by Historian View Post
    I watched for 45 minutes...then when they all started drowning each other out at the same time, I put Star Trek TNG back on, because you couldn't hear anything anyways.

    As good as Nora O'Donnell is at anchoring....she's a terrible debate moderator. CBS looked real bad last night.

    I thought Bernie was his usual Bernie. They can't pierce his armor, because (like him or not) his views are made of titanium. Unlike the rest of them who's opinions are swayed by the latest poll.

    Warren went hard after Bloomingonion. Imagine being a Wells Fargo executive testifying before her. She had a good night, but is way too hyper-fixated on minutiae.

    Again, Bloomingberger is emblematic of what's wrong with politics, nay our entire country today. Money has tainted everything. He wants to defeat Trump. So what? Reminds me of that line in Roadhouse where Swayze and Lynch are arguing about taking on Brad Wesley, when Lynch yells at him, "WHO'S GONNA SAVE THEM FROM YOU???"

    Amy didn't even get to speak until the third or fourth question. They simply ignored her. Still think she ends up as someone's VP.

    Buttigig came off as a petulant child. I think his 15 minutes are almost up.

    I thought Biden spoke with command last night, unfortunately, half the time I had no idea what he was talking about.

    Steyer, just go home.
    Haha...no they aren't. His "views" are made of paper stuck together with pieces of bull****.

  16. #135
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    16,532
    Thanks
    10,353
    Thanked 6,936 Times in 4,295 Posts
    Power to Give Rep
    44

    Re: South Carolina Dem. Debate Thread 2/25

    Quote Originally Posted by Canadian'eh! View Post
    Two things. Some of Sanders essays are completely out of context. The "rape fantasy" one was about toxic traditional gender roles. he was referencing romantic novels and the content that sells. He wasn't implying ALL women have rape fantasy...

    the others i've not read in full. Some of it sounds like 1969 things that turned out to be just wrong and dumb, but people were thinking might have some validity in 1969. He seemed to suggest there could be some link between the inability of women to achieve orgasm and cervical cancer..... which obviously isn't true. Though there's a link with HPV from sexual contact, i'm betting they didn't know that in 1969. So, a link between sex and Cervical cancer, might have been being questioned. i mean... it was 50 years ago! he MIGHT have learned some things in 50 years.
    Well....according to the Bernie Cultists, he has never changed his opinion about anything ever.


    And your observation that "Some of Sanders essays are completely out of context."....what in the hell does that even matter???? Do you think that Trump is constrained by objectively telling the truth about Bernie???

    You guys have no idea what's coming down the pike. Bernie makes it EASY to destroy him in a general elections, and Trump will do just that.

    The Democrats have coddled and handled him with kid gloves for 5 years....they were ****ing idiots for doing that. Bernie has NEVER been vetted with a tough election.

    If, God forbid, he wins the nomination....you will see exactly how real "vetting" is done....and he will not come out of it alive (politically).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •