Would you have traded Wildgoose + 5th for Ertz today?

[YardRat]

You can't trade a practice squad player.

And who from the regular roster are you going to cut to make room for Ertz?

So...no.

[Novacane]

No and not because I wouldn't want to give up Wildgoose and the pick. Ertz wasn't needed with the emergence of Knox. We already have Beasley and Davis who aren't getting targets they're used to.

[swiper]

No and not because I wouldn't want to give up Wildgoose and the pick. Ertz wasn't needed with the emergence of Knox. We already have Beasley and Davis who aren't getting targets they're used to.

Didn't seem Ertz was needed in Arizona either. They seemed to be doing ok without him too.

[YardRat]

Didn't seem Ertz was needed in Arizona either. They seemed to be doing ok without him too.

They lost Maxx Williams (their only TE with any catches this season) for the year this past Sunday.

[Woodman]

They lost Maxx Williams (their only TE with any catches this season) for the year this past Sunday.

They did have the need to deal.

We absolutely did not.

[swiper]

They lost Maxx Williams (their only TE with any catches this season) for the year this past Sunday.

They had no other tight ends on their roster?

[YardRat]

They had no other tight ends on their roster?

Maybe the equivalent of Sweeney and Gilliam, so basically...not really.

[ParanoidAndroid]

Ertz: 18 rec 189 yds 10.5 avg long of 28 2 TDs - 8.5M salary
Knox: 18 rec 261 yds 14.5 avg long of 53 5 TDs - 850k salary

no brainer at this point.

That's with one less game played by Knox.

[notacon]

Didn't seem Ertz was needed in Arizona either. They seemed to be doing ok without him too.

Good to see you have changed you mind from earlier this year.

[Mr. Pink]

Great, now we have people who think Dawson Knox is better than Zach Ertz.

smh

[justasportsfan]

Great, now we have people who think Dawson Knox is better than Zach Ertz.

smh

right now the numbers show he is for a fraction of the cost.

[Mace]

Great, now we have people who think Dawson Knox is better than Zach Ertz.

smh

Well, we're talking right now, not yesterday. He is, atm.

[Mace]

Where did that Zack Ertz thread go ? It was here a few hours ago

I kind of wonder how long you had to film and encourage your grandchildren before getting this, cackling with glee and going home on the vehicle you loaned them, eating the candy bars you promised them.

"Let that be a lesson to you, and remember Grandpa taught you not to run anyone over. Haha. Give me my cart, Goodbye."

[Woodman]

Great, now we have people who think Dawson Knox is better than Zach Ertz.

smh

Of course he's a better value in our offense.

[Woodman]

Well, we're talking right now, not yesterday. He is, atm.

ATM very good .... every time Bass kicks an extra point or a successful fg my son says "Money" I'll have to get him to switch that to ATM

[Woodman]

right now the numbers show he is for a fraction of the cost.

about 10%

[Mr. Pink]

right now the numbers show he is for a fraction of the cost.

Yeah look at the difference at who the QB is.

Ertz has the same amount of catches while having a guy behind center who is a few levels below Josh Allen.

[TigerJ]

Nope. I like Knox. Sweeney hasn't done anything yet, but I want to give him a little more time. I think he has some upside. He needs time and opportunity.

[justasportsfan]

Yeah look at the difference at who the QB is.

Ertz has the same amount of catches while having a guy behind center who is a few levels below Josh Allen.

thats a woulda shoulda argument. Numbers and salary, Knox atm.

[Woodman]

Nope. I like Knox. Sweeney hasn't done anything yet, but I want to give him a little more time. I think he has some upside. He needs time and opportunity.

How great would that be to have two productive TE's!!!